Virtual McKenzie Exercises and Centralization of Pain: A Pilot Study
NCT ID: NCT07285824
Last Updated: 2025-12-16
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
40 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2025-12-31
Study Completion Date
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Low back pain (LBP) is frequently managed in physical therapy using the McKenzie method, in which a patient's directional preference-most commonly extension-is used to guide treatment. Extension-based interventions are associated with symptom improvement and centralization in many individuals with LBP. At the same time, research in pain neuroscience has shown that people with LBP may have altered cortical representations of the low back, which may contribute to pain and disability. For patients who experience high pain levels or significant fear of movement, active directional preference exercises may be difficult to perform.
Motor imagery, the mental simulation of movement without physical execution, has been shown to activate brain regions involved in movement and may help modify altered cortical representations. Preliminary research has suggested that virtual or imagery-based McKenzie extension exercises may improve pain and movement-related outcomes.
This exploratory study aims to evaluate the immediate effects of a brief motor imagery-based extension protocol in adults with LBP who demonstrate a directional preference for extension. The study will assess changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, lumbar flexion, straight leg raise, pain distribution, and symptom centralization following a single motor imagery session.
Motor imagery, the mental simulation of movement without physical execution, has been shown to activate brain regions involved in movement and may help modify altered cortical representations. Preliminary research has suggested that virtual or imagery-based McKenzie extension exercises may improve pain and movement-related outcomes.
This exploratory study aims to evaluate the immediate effects of a brief motor imagery-based extension protocol in adults with LBP who demonstrate a directional preference for extension. The study will assess changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, lumbar flexion, straight leg raise, pain distribution, and symptom centralization following a single motor imagery session.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background and Rationale:
Low back pain (LBP) is the most common musculoskeletal condition treated in outpatient physical therapy, accounting for approximately 25-40% of patient visits. Directional preference, a key element of the McKenzie method, is widely used in the management of LBP. This approach assesses how a patient's symptoms respond to repeated or sustained directional movements-most commonly flexion or extension-and integrates the direction that reduces or centralizes symptoms into the treatment plan. Previous research demonstrates that extension-based directional preference strategies are effective for a large proportion of patients with LBP and are associated with pain reduction, increased mobility, reduced fear of movement, and centralization of radiating symptoms.
In parallel with traditional mechanical assessment and treatment methods, pain neuroscience research has highlighted the role of changes in cortical body maps, particularly in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), in individuals with LBP. People with persistent LBP exhibit altered S1 representations, including changes in size and organization of cortical maps, which are associated with pain, disability, and functional limitations. These representations are dynamic, and movement-based therapies can help normalize them.
However, patients with high pain levels, significant fear-avoidance, or sensitized nervous systems may find movement-based interventions difficult to perform. Motor imagery-mentally simulating movement without performing it physically-may provide an alternative method for modifying cortical representations while reducing threat and avoiding symptom aggravation. Motor imagery activates neural regions similar to those used during actual movement execution and may be beneficial for individuals reluctant to engage in active movement.
Preliminary findings have suggested that virtual or imagery-based McKenzie extension movements may improve pain, fear-avoidance, catastrophization, and mobility in individuals with LBP. Because centralization of symptoms is a hallmark feature of directional preference-based care, this study aims to further explore whether a brief motor imagery-based extension protocol can influence pain intensity, body pain distribution, psychological constructs, physical measures, and centralization in patients with LBP who demonstrate an extension directional preference.
Study Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the immediate effects of a guided motor imagery extension protocol in patients with LBP who demonstrate a directional preference for extension. The study aims to determine whether the intervention results in changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, lumbar flexion, straight leg raise, and pain distribution, as well as whether patients report centralization of symptoms.
Study Design:
This study is a single-group, pre-post exploratory design conducted across three outpatient physical therapy clinics. Institutional Review Board approval will be obtained prior to study initiation. Eligible patients presenting with LBP will be identified during their initial evaluation. Participants must be between 18 and 65 years of age, able to read and understand English, present with no red flags during review of systems, have no prior spinal surgery, and demonstrate a positive response to extension-based directional preference testing. Participation is voluntary and requires written informed consent.
Intervention Procedures:
Following consent, participants will complete a demographics questionnaire. A blinded therapist will administer baseline measures including disability, pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophization, active trunk flexion, straight leg raise (SLR), and a pain body chart.
Participants will then receive a brief educational explanation of cortical map changes associated with LBP. Next, participants will assume a prone "pre-press-up" position, placing their hands under their shoulders. Instead of performing an active press-up, they will close their eyes and receive verbal guidance through a series of ten motor imagery-based lumbar extension movements. The standardized script instructs participants to visualize completing a full press-up, experiencing spinal extension, holding briefly at end range, and returning to the starting position. Total intervention time is approximately five minutes.
Immediately following the imagery protocol, a blinded therapist will repeat all outcome measures. After data collection, clinicians will resume their usual plan of care for each patient.
Outcome Measures:
Pre- and post-intervention measures include:
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to assess functional disability
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for low back and leg pain
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), including Physical Activity and Work subscales
Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)
Active lumbar flexion (fingertip-to-floor distance in centimeters)
Straight Leg Raise measured with an inclinometer
Body chart with grid overlay to quantify pain distribution and potential changes in cortical representation
Data Management and Analysis:
De-identified data will be compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics for demographic variables. Pre- and post-intervention comparisons will be performed using paired-samples t-tests with significance set at p \< 0.05. Significant findings will be confirmed with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks nonparametric testing.
Low back pain (LBP) is the most common musculoskeletal condition treated in outpatient physical therapy, accounting for approximately 25-40% of patient visits. Directional preference, a key element of the McKenzie method, is widely used in the management of LBP. This approach assesses how a patient's symptoms respond to repeated or sustained directional movements-most commonly flexion or extension-and integrates the direction that reduces or centralizes symptoms into the treatment plan. Previous research demonstrates that extension-based directional preference strategies are effective for a large proportion of patients with LBP and are associated with pain reduction, increased mobility, reduced fear of movement, and centralization of radiating symptoms.
In parallel with traditional mechanical assessment and treatment methods, pain neuroscience research has highlighted the role of changes in cortical body maps, particularly in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), in individuals with LBP. People with persistent LBP exhibit altered S1 representations, including changes in size and organization of cortical maps, which are associated with pain, disability, and functional limitations. These representations are dynamic, and movement-based therapies can help normalize them.
However, patients with high pain levels, significant fear-avoidance, or sensitized nervous systems may find movement-based interventions difficult to perform. Motor imagery-mentally simulating movement without performing it physically-may provide an alternative method for modifying cortical representations while reducing threat and avoiding symptom aggravation. Motor imagery activates neural regions similar to those used during actual movement execution and may be beneficial for individuals reluctant to engage in active movement.
Preliminary findings have suggested that virtual or imagery-based McKenzie extension movements may improve pain, fear-avoidance, catastrophization, and mobility in individuals with LBP. Because centralization of symptoms is a hallmark feature of directional preference-based care, this study aims to further explore whether a brief motor imagery-based extension protocol can influence pain intensity, body pain distribution, psychological constructs, physical measures, and centralization in patients with LBP who demonstrate an extension directional preference.
Study Objectives:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the immediate effects of a guided motor imagery extension protocol in patients with LBP who demonstrate a directional preference for extension. The study aims to determine whether the intervention results in changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, lumbar flexion, straight leg raise, and pain distribution, as well as whether patients report centralization of symptoms.
Study Design:
This study is a single-group, pre-post exploratory design conducted across three outpatient physical therapy clinics. Institutional Review Board approval will be obtained prior to study initiation. Eligible patients presenting with LBP will be identified during their initial evaluation. Participants must be between 18 and 65 years of age, able to read and understand English, present with no red flags during review of systems, have no prior spinal surgery, and demonstrate a positive response to extension-based directional preference testing. Participation is voluntary and requires written informed consent.
Intervention Procedures:
Following consent, participants will complete a demographics questionnaire. A blinded therapist will administer baseline measures including disability, pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophization, active trunk flexion, straight leg raise (SLR), and a pain body chart.
Participants will then receive a brief educational explanation of cortical map changes associated with LBP. Next, participants will assume a prone "pre-press-up" position, placing their hands under their shoulders. Instead of performing an active press-up, they will close their eyes and receive verbal guidance through a series of ten motor imagery-based lumbar extension movements. The standardized script instructs participants to visualize completing a full press-up, experiencing spinal extension, holding briefly at end range, and returning to the starting position. Total intervention time is approximately five minutes.
Immediately following the imagery protocol, a blinded therapist will repeat all outcome measures. After data collection, clinicians will resume their usual plan of care for each patient.
Outcome Measures:
Pre- and post-intervention measures include:
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to assess functional disability
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for low back and leg pain
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), including Physical Activity and Work subscales
Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)
Active lumbar flexion (fingertip-to-floor distance in centimeters)
Straight Leg Raise measured with an inclinometer
Body chart with grid overlay to quantify pain distribution and potential changes in cortical representation
Data Management and Analysis:
De-identified data will be compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics for demographic variables. Pre- and post-intervention comparisons will be performed using paired-samples t-tests with significance set at p \< 0.05. Significant findings will be confirmed with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks nonparametric testing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Chronic Pain
Low Back Pain
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motor Imagery Extension Protocol
Participants with low back pain who demonstrate a directional preference for extension will receive a single session of a guided motor imagery protocol simulating lumbar extension movements based on the McKenzie method. The intervention is designed to mentally replicate an extension press-up without requiring physical movement.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Motor Imagery-Based Lumbar Extension
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Participants will lie prone with hands positioned under the shoulders in a standard "pre-press-up" position. With eyes closed, participants will be verbally guided through ten imagined lumbar extension press-ups. The standardized motor imagery script includes:
Focusing attention on current back and leg symptoms
Imagining pushing the arms into extension
Visualizing the back arching into extension
Holding the imagined end-range position for several seconds
Imagining returning to the starting position in a controlled manner
Repeating this process ten times
Total duration of the protocol is approximately 5 minutes.
Mode of Delivery:
In-person, guided by a physical therapist trained in the study protocol.
Purpose:
To evaluate immediate changes in pain, disability, psychological measures, physical mobility, neurodynamic measures, and symptom centralization following a motor imagery-based extension intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motor Imagery-Based Lumbar Extension
Participants will lie prone with hands positioned under the shoulders in a standard "pre-press-up" position. With eyes closed, participants will be verbally guided through ten imagined lumbar extension press-ups. The standardized motor imagery script includes:
Focusing attention on current back and leg symptoms
Imagining pushing the arms into extension
Visualizing the back arching into extension
Holding the imagined end-range position for several seconds
Imagining returning to the starting position in a controlled manner
Repeating this process ten times
Total duration of the protocol is approximately 5 minutes.
Mode of Delivery:
In-person, guided by a physical therapist trained in the study protocol.
Purpose:
To evaluate immediate changes in pain, disability, psychological measures, physical mobility, neurodynamic measures, and symptom centralization following a motor imagery-based extension intervention.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Age 18 to 65 years
Presenting to outpatient physical therapy with low back pain (LBP)
Able to read and understand English
No red flags identified during review of systems and initial physical therapy evaluation
No prior spinal surgery
Demonstrates a positive response to extension-based directional preference testing
Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Presenting to outpatient physical therapy with low back pain (LBP)
Able to read and understand English
No red flags identified during review of systems and initial physical therapy evaluation
No prior spinal surgery
Demonstrates a positive response to extension-based directional preference testing
Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
Age younger than 18 or older than 65
Inability to read or understand English
Presence of red flags during review of systems (e.g., suspected fracture, malignancy, infection, cauda equina symptoms)
History of spinal surgery
No demonstrable directional preference for extension during evaluation
Any condition that the evaluating clinician determines would preclude safe participation
Declines to participate or is unable to provide informed consent
Inability to read or understand English
Presence of red flags during review of systems (e.g., suspected fracture, malignancy, infection, cauda equina symptoms)
History of spinal surgery
No demonstrable directional preference for extension during evaluation
Any condition that the evaluating clinician determines would preclude safe participation
Declines to participate or is unable to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
65 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
College of St. Scholastica, Inc.
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Evidence In Motion
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nechvatal P, Hitrik T, Kendrova LD, Macej M. Comparison of the effect of the McKenzie method and spiral stabilization in patients with low back pain: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(3):641-647. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210055.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Long A, Donelson R, Fung T. Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2593-602. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146464.23007.2a.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Childs JD. Psychometric properties of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;87(2):109-17. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815b61f1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley GL. Widespread brain activity during an abdominal task markedly reduced after pain physiology education: fMRI evaluation of a single patient with chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70053-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley L. Combined physiotherapy and education is efficacious for chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(4):297-302. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60169-0.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kuhnow A, Kuhnow J, Ham D, Rosedale R. The McKenzie Method and its association with psychosocial outcomes in low back pain: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Dec;37(12):1283-1297. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1710881. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gerhardt A, Eich W, Janke S, Leisner S, Treede RD, Tesarz J. Chronic Widespread Back Pain is Distinct From Chronic Local Back Pain: Evidence From Quantitative Sensory Testing, Pain Drawings, and Psychometrics. Clin J Pain. 2016 Jul;32(7):568-79. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000300.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sanders NW, Mann NH 3rd, Spengler DM. Pain drawing scoring is not improved by inclusion of patient-reported pain sensation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2735-41; discussion 2742-3. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244674.99258.f9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lacey RJ, Lewis M, Jordan K, Jinks C, Sim J. Interrater reliability of scoring of pain drawings in a self-report health survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16):E455-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174274.38485.ee.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Matthews M, Rathleff MS, Vicenzino B, Boudreau SA. Capturing patient-reported area of knee pain: a concurrent validity study using digital technology in patients with patellofemoral pain. PeerJ. 2018 Mar 8;6:e4406. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4406. eCollection 2018.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wand BM, Keeves J, Bourgoin C, George PJ, Smith AJ, O'Connell NE, Moseley GL. Mislocalization of sensory information in people with chronic low back pain: a preliminary investigation. Clin J Pain. 2013 Aug;29(8):737-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318274b320.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ekedahl H, Jonsson B, Frobell RB. Fingertip-to-floor test and straight leg raising test: validity, responsiveness, and predictive value in patients with acute/subacute low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zimney K, Louw A, Puentedura EJ. Use of Therapeutic Neuroscience Education to address psychosocial factors associated with acute low back pain: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014 Apr;30(3):202-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2013.856508. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
George SZ, Valencia C, Beneciuk JM. A psychometric investigation of fear-avoidance model measures in patients with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):197-205. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3298.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley GL. Evidence for a direct relationship between cognitive and physical change during an education intervention in people with chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2004 Feb;8(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00063-6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):324-30. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00007.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson KM, Summerton N. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Dec 1;24(23):2484-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199912010-00010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fritz JM, George SZ. Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs. Phys Ther. 2002 Oct;82(10):973-83.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Baron G, Henanff LA, Coudeyre E, Rozenberg S, Huas D, Martineau C, Jolivet-Landreau I, Garcia-Mace J, Revel M, Ravaud P. Fear-avoidance beliefs about back pain in patients with subacute low back pain. Pain. 2006 Oct;124(3):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.019. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Grotle M, Vollestad NK, Brox JI. Clinical course and impact of fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain: prospective cohort study of acute and chronic low back pain: II. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):1038-46. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214878.01709.0e.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hakkinen A, Kautiainen H, Jarvenpaa S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J. Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0187-8. Epub 2006 Aug 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001 Feb;81(2):776-88. doi: 10.1093/ptj/81.2.776.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 15;23(18):2003-13. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Louw A, Farrell K, Landers M, Barclay M, Goodman E, Gillund J, McCaffrey S, Timmerman L. The effect of manual therapy and neuroplasticity education on chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2017 Dec;25(5):227-234. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2016.1231860. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Louw A, Goldrick S, Bernstetter A, Van Gelder LH, Parr A, Zimney K, Cox T. Evaluation is treatment for low back pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Feb;29(1):4-13. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1730056. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Louw A, Farrell K, Nielsen A, O'Malley M, Cox T, Puentedura EJ. Virtual McKenzie extension exercises for low back and leg pain: a prospective pilot exploratory case series. J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Feb;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2092822. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 1996 Apr;119 ( Pt 2):593-609. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.593.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lotze M, Halsband U. Motor imagery. J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):386-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 May 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.01.006.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G. Fear of movement/(re)injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther. 1999 Nov;4(4):187-95. doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0199.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Boeren RGB, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995 Sep;62(3):363-372. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00279-N.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lloyd D, Findlay G, Roberts N, Nurmikko T. Differences in low back pain behavior are reflected in the cerebral response to tactile stimulation of the lower back. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1372-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181734a8a.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flor H, Elbert T, Muhlnickel W, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Taub E. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Mar;119(2):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s002210050334.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley GL. Distorted body image in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology. 2005 Sep 13;65(5):773. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000174515.07205.11. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lotze M, Moseley GL. Role of distorted body image in pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Dec;9(6):488-96. doi: 10.1007/s11926-007-0079-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Moseley LG. I can't find it! Distorted body image and tactile dysfunction in patients with chronic back pain. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Maihofner C, Neundorfer B, Birklein F, Handwerker HO. Mislocalization of tactile stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. J Neurol. 2006 Jun;253(6):772-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0117-z. Epub 2006 May 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flor H, Braun C, Elbert T, Birbaumer N. Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients. Neurosci Lett. 1997 Mar 7;224(1):5-8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)13441-3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Holmes NP, Spence C. The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn Process. 2004 Jun;5(2):94-105. doi: 10.1007/s10339-004-0013-3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stavrinou ML, Della Penna S, Pizzella V, Torquati K, Cianflone F, Franciotti R, Bezerianos A, Romani GL, Rossini PM. Temporal dynamics of plastic changes in human primary somatosensory cortex after finger webbing. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17(9):2134-42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl120. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flor H. The functional organization of the brain in chronic pain. Prog Brain Res. 2000;129:313-22. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)29023-7. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wand BM, Parkitny L, O'Connell NE, Luomajoki H, McAuley JH, Thacker M, Moseley GL. Cortical changes in chronic low back pain: current state of the art and implications for clinical practice. Man Ther. 2011 Feb;16(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nijs J, Roussel N, Paul van Wilgen C, Koke A, Smeets R. Thinking beyond muscles and joints: therapists' and patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther. 2013 Apr;18(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R, Grant W. A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. A predictor of symptomatic discs and anular competence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 May 15;22(10):1115-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199705150-00011.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Namnaqani FI, Mashabi AS, Yaseen KM, Alshehri MA. The effectiveness of McKenzie method compared to manual therapy for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2019 Dec 1;19(4):492-499.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Karlsson M, Bergenheim A, Larsson MEH, Nordeman L, van Tulder M, Bernhardsson S. Effects of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 14;9(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01412-8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Surkitt LD, Ford JJ, Hahne AJ, Pizzari T, McMeeken JM. Efficacy of directional preference management for low back pain: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2012 May;92(5):652-65. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100251. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
May S, Aina A. Centralization and directional preference: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2012 Dec;17(6):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
May S, Rosedale R. An international survey of the comprehensiveness of the McKenzie classification system and the proportions of classifications and directional preferences in patients with spinal pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Feb;39:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Halliday MH, Pappas E, Hancock MJ, Clare HA, Pinto RZ, Robertson G, Ferreira PH. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the McKenzie Method to Motor Control Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain and a Directional Preference. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;46(7):514-22. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6379. Epub 2016 May 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hefford C. McKenzie classification of mechanical spinal pain: profile of syndromes and directions of preference. Man Ther. 2008 Feb;13(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, Gilliam JR, Hendren S, Norman KS. Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1-CPG60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zheng P, Kao MC, Karayannis NV, Smuck M. Stagnant Physical Therapy Referral Rates Alongside Rising Opioid Prescription Rates in Patients With Low Back Pain in the United States 1997-2010. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):670-674. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001875.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VirtualMcKenzie2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id