Gatifloxacin Versus Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Enteric Fever

NCT ID: NCT01421693

Last Updated: 2016-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim to compare two antibiotic treatments for enteric (typhoid) fever. Three hundred patients at Patan Hospital will be enrolled in the study. Patients will be assigned to one of the two treatments by chance and followed for 6 months. The two treatment groups will be compared to see which treatment is more likely to make the patient better.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the study hypothesis that Gatifloxacin is superior to Ceftriaxone in terms of treatment failure in patients with enteric fever, a comparative study will be conducted at Patan Hospital. 300 patients who are diagnosed with enteric fever will be enrolled into the study. The patients will be randomized to one of two groups. One group will receive treatment with Gatifloxacin for 7 days, and the other with Ceftriaxone. The patients will be followed during the treatment courses and at several points of 6 months after initial presentation. The endpoints then will be compared between two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enteric Fever Typhoid Fever

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gatifloxacin

Gatifloxacin 10mg/kg/day for 7 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gatifloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg/day for 7 days. Tablets for oral administration.

Ceftriaxone

* ≥2-\<14 years - 60mg/kg/ once daily for 7 days
* 14 years and older - 2g once daily for 7 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ceftriaxone

Intervention Type DRUG

* ≥2-\<14 years - 60mg/kg/ once daily for 7 days
* 14 years and older - 2g once daily for 7 days
* Intravenous infusion. Vials of crystalline powder.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ceftriaxone

* ≥2-\<14 years - 60mg/kg/ once daily for 7 days
* 14 years and older - 2g once daily for 7 days
* Intravenous infusion. Vials of crystalline powder.

Intervention Type DRUG

Gatifloxacin

Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg/day for 7 days. Tablets for oral administration.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Suspected or culture proven enteric fever
* \>= 2 \<= 45 years of age
* Fever \>= 38°C for \>= 4 days
* Informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Obtundation
* Shock
* Visible jaundice
* Presence of signs of gastrointestinal bleeding
* Evidence of severe disease
* Diabetes
* History of hypersensitivity to either of the trial drugs
* Known previous treatment with a quinolone antibiotic or 3rd generation cephalosporin or macrolide within one week of hospital admission.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patan Hospital, Nepal

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Civil Hospital, Nepal

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Buddha Basnyat, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Oxford

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Civil Hospital

Kathmandu, , Nepal

Site Status

Patan Hospital

Kathmandu, , Nepal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Nepal

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arjyal A, Basnyat B, Nhan HT, Koirala S, Giri A, Joshi N, Shakya M, Pathak KR, Mahat SP, Prajapati SP, Adhikari N, Thapa R, Merson L, Gajurel D, Lamsal K, Lamsal D, Yadav BK, Shah G, Shrestha P, Dongol S, Karkey A, Thompson CN, Thieu NTV, Thanh DP, Baker S, Thwaites GE, Wolbers M, Dolecek C. Gatifloxacin versus ceftriaxone for uncomplicated enteric fever in Nepal: an open-label, two-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 May;16(5):535-545. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00530-7. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26809813 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.oucru.org

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Viet Nam

http://www.tropicalmedicine.ox.ac.uk/nepal

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Nepal

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

03NP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Qnr Genes in Enterobacteriaceae
NCT02834910 COMPLETED