Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

NCT ID: NCT00195351

Last Updated: 2013-02-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

467 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a phase 3b/4 randomized, open-label, comparative, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of tigecycline to ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole in hospitalized subjects with cIAI (Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection). Subjects with clinical signs and symptoms of cIAI will be included for enrollment. Subjects will be stratified at randomization for Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation scale (APACHE II) score \< 10 and \> 10. Subjects will be followed for efficacy through the test-of-cure assessment. Safety evaluations will occur through the treatment and post-treatment periods and continue through resolution or stability of the adverse event(s).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis Cholecystitis Cross Infection Diverticulitis Peritonitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tigecycline

Intervention Type DRUG

every 12 hours IV (an initial dose of 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 hours)

B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ceftriaxone sodium + metronidazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g once daily intravenously plus metronidazole 1 g to 2 g daily given in divided doses intravenously. Test article should be administered for a minimum of 4 days and up to 14 days at the discretion of the investigator.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tigecycline

every 12 hours IV (an initial dose of 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 hours)

Intervention Type DRUG

ceftriaxone sodium + metronidazole

Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g once daily intravenously plus metronidazole 1 g to 2 g daily given in divided doses intravenously. Test article should be administered for a minimum of 4 days and up to 14 days at the discretion of the investigator.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of complicated intra-abdominal infection that requires surgery within 24 hours.
* Fever over 100.4°F (38.0°C) or high white blood cell count plus other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cancer
* Medicines that suppress the immune system
* Dialysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

West Roxbury, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Laconia, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Corsiana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Ajax, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Rimouski, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Viña del Mar, , Chile

Site Status

Mexico D.F. CP, , Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Brazil Canada Chile Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Towfigh S, Pasternak J, Poirier A, Leister H, Babinchak T. A multicentre, open-label, randomized comparative study of tigecycline versus ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole for the treatment of hospitalized subjects with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Aug;16(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03122.x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20670293 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3074A1-400

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.