Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)

NCT ID: NCT00230971

Last Updated: 2013-02-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

473 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study of the safety and efficacy of tigecycline to ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole in hospitalized subjects with cIAI. Subjects will be followed for efficacy through the test-of-cure assessment. Safety evaluations will occur through the treatment and post-treatment periods and continue through resolution or stability of the adverse event(s).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis Cholecystitis Diverticulitis Intra-Abdominal Abscess Intra-Abdominal Infection Peritonitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tigecycline

Intervention Type DRUG

every 12 hours IV (an initial dose of 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 hours)

B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ceftriaxone plus metronidazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g once daily intravenously plus metronidazole 1 g to 2 g daily given in divided doses intravenously. Test article should be administered for a minimum of 4 days and up to 14 days at the discretion of the investigator.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tigecycline

every 12 hours IV (an initial dose of 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 hours)

Intervention Type DRUG

ceftriaxone plus metronidazole

Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g once daily intravenously plus metronidazole 1 g to 2 g daily given in divided doses intravenously. Test article should be administered for a minimum of 4 days and up to 14 days at the discretion of the investigator.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of complicated intra-abdominal infection that requires surgery within 24 hours.
* Fever plus other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cancer
* Medicines that suppress the immune system
* Dialysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Australia, China, Hong Kong, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Taiwan, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Denmark, Finland, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Germany, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For South Africa, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Italy, Greece, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For UK, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Switzerland, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For France, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Spain, [email protected]

Trial Manager

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

For Turkey, [email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nambour, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Cairns, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Lahti, , Finland

Site Status

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

New Territories, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Pokfulam, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Site Status

Bhopal, , India

Site Status

Lucknow, , India

Site Status

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Vicenza, , Italy

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Almada, , Portugal

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Bellville, , South Africa

Site Status

Kuilsriver, , South Africa

Site Status

Parow, , South Africa

Site Status

Pietermaritzburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Stockport, Cheshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wigan, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia China Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hong Kong India Italy Philippines Portugal Saudi Arabia South Africa Spain Switzerland Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Qvist N, Warren B, Leister-Tebbe H, Zito ET, Pedersen R, McGovern PC, Babinchak T. Efficacy of tigecycline versus ceftriaxone plus metronidazole for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: results from a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012 Apr;13(2):102-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.048. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22439781 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3074A1-315

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.