Study Comparing Tigecycline and Imipenem/Cilastatin in Chinese Subjects With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
NCT ID: NCT00136201
Last Updated: 2009-07-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-11-30
2006-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Tigecycline Compared With Imipenem/Cliastatin to Treat Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection
NCT01721408
Study Comparing Tigecycline to Imipenem/Cilastatin in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Subjects
NCT00081744
Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline in Hospitalized Patients With cIAI
NCT00488306
Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
NCT00195351
Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)
NCT00230971
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
armDesc1
tigecycline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tigecycline
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medical Monitor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Guoxuexiang, Chengdu, China
Shengyang, Liaoning, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Beijing, , China
Beijing, , China
Beijing, , China
Shanghai, , China
Shanghai, , China
Shanghai, , China
Shanghai, , China
Wuhan, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fomin P, Koalov S, Cooper A, Babinchak T, Dartois N, De Vane N, Castaing N, Tellado J; 301 And 306 Study Groups. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections - the European experience. J Chemother. 2008 Oct;20 Suppl 1:12-9. doi: 10.1179/joc.2008.20.Supplement-1.12.
Chen Z, Wu J, Zhang Y, Wei J, Leng X, Bi J, Li R, Yan L, Quan Z, Chen X, Yu Y, Wu Z, Liu D, Ma X, Maroko R, Cooper A. Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 21;10:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-217.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3074A1-316
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.