A Study to Characterize Event Related Potential Markers of Attentional Bias Towards Words and Images of Food
NCT ID: NCT01366508
Last Updated: 2014-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Attentive Eating for Weight Loss
NCT03602001
Cognitive Distraction on Food Intake: Randomized Crossover Exploratory Study
NCT04078607
Oral Processing and Appetite in Older Adults
NCT05671003
Full4Health: Understanding Food-gut-brain Axis Across the Lifecourse
NCT01597024
Reduced Carbohydrate Versus Fat in Obese Subjects
NCT00846040
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Measuring event related potentials (ERPs) during cognitive processes of food related cues, using the electroencephalography technique (EEG) offers a an alternative objective approach to examining the effectives of anti-obesity drugs.
This protocol proposes to develop and use two cognitive tasks examining response to food related cues (pictorial and words) with concurrent recording of ERPs, in order to characterize neurophysiological events associated with attentional bias towards food related stimuli.
The first task is an image processing task. This task uses food images similar to those in the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) used in ERP studies of perceptual processing of emotional stimuli \[Olofsson, 2008; Schupp, 2006\]. In this task a subject views different categories of images; palatable high-calorie food images, non-palatable low-calorie food images and non-edible plant images. The latter is the neutral category against which the ERPs of the two food categories will be compared. Affective pictures have been used to assess emotional valence by measuring differences in anterior ERP measurements between images from differing groups.
The protocol also proposes to measure late positive potential in order to assess higher level cognitive processing possibly with early memory formation. Again, the proposal is to assess AUCs, in this case in the 400-600 ms region and then look at difference curves between the late potential potentials to different valency stimuli. For the late positive potentials, anterior laterality will also be assessed. The second task is a cued-target task of visuospatial attention to motivationally salient words. The task is a version of the Posner paradigm. The appearance of a food or nonfood word inside a top or bottom frame (the cue) distracts the attention of the subject towards that spatial location. Following the word either one of the two frames changes appearance (the target).
In addition to these emotion and attention measures, the protocol proposes to assess the more standard N1, P1 and P3 \[Luck, 2005\]. After completing the ERP recordings the subject will be asked to rate each picture for salience and valence in order to provide a comparison between objective neurophysiological and subjective attention and emotional ratings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Visit B
At approximately 09:00 the subject will be given breakfast. After this, no food will be served until study procedures for the day are over. However, a 330 ml bottle of still water at room temperature will be given at \~11:00 and at \~13:00. During this period the subject will be required to remain in the unit.
High calorie lunch
Subject fed a standard high calorie lunch at 1pm
Breakfast
At approximately 09:00 the subject will be given breakfast. After this, no food will be served until study procedures for the day are over. However, a 330 ml bottle of still water at room temperature will be given at \~11:00 and at \~13:00. During this period the subject will be required to remain in the unit.
Visit A
At approximately 13:00 the subject will be given a standard high calorie lunch that the subject is required to finish
High calorie lunch
Subject fed a standard high calorie lunch at 1pm
Breakfast
At approximately 09:00 the subject will be given breakfast. After this, no food will be served until study procedures for the day are over. However, a 330 ml bottle of still water at room temperature will be given at \~11:00 and at \~13:00. During this period the subject will be required to remain in the unit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High calorie lunch
Subject fed a standard high calorie lunch at 1pm
Breakfast
At approximately 09:00 the subject will be given breakfast. After this, no food will be served until study procedures for the day are over. However, a 330 ml bottle of still water at room temperature will be given at \~11:00 and at \~13:00. During this period the subject will be required to remain in the unit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Right handed male between 18 and 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
2. BMI within the range 27 - 35 kg/m2 (inclusive).
3. Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
1. The subject has either a previous disease or current medical condition, which as judged by the Investigator, may affect the interpretation of efficacy data. These diseases include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, hepatic disease, renal disease, haematological disease, neurological disease, psychiatric diseases or endocrine disease.
2. The subject has a positive urine drug screen. A minimum list of drugs that will be screened for include Amphetamines, Barbiturates, Cocaine, Opiates, Cannabinoids, Methadone and Benzodiazepines.
3. The subject has a history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence in the 6 months prior to screening as determined by the investigator. Abuse of alcohol, defined for males, as an average weekly intake of greater than 28 units (or an average daily intake of greater than 4 units). One unit is equivalent to a half-pint (220mL) of beer or 1 (25mL) measure of spirits or 1 glass (125mL) of wine.
4. A positive alcohol breath test.
5. The subject has a history of stroke, seizures, epilepsy or abnormal EEG.
6. The subject is a smoker.
7. The subject has participated in a clinical trial and has received an investigational product within the following time period prior to the first dosing day in the current study: 30 days, 5 half-lives or twice the duration of the biological effect of the investigational product (whichever is longer).
8. Subjects who are currently taking any regular medication.
9. Subject has a history of clinically significant eating disorders.
10. Subject is a vegetarian.
11. Subject is a member of GlaxoSmithKline Clinical Unit staff.
12. Subject is female.
18 Years
65 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
112336
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.