SuperB Trial: SUrgical Versus PERcutaneous Bypass

NCT ID: NCT01220245

Last Updated: 2021-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial, the heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass will be compared to the surgical venous femoro-popliteal bypass, based on the non-inferiority principle for the patency. Besides equal patency, an improved quality of life is expected. Recruitment will take the first two years and patients will be followed during five years. Patients with an indication for surgical bypass, classified category 3-6 with a \>50% stenosis or occlusion of the SFA over \>/=10 cm in length will be included. At least one crural artery should be patent without significant lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Heparin-bonded endoluminal fempop bypass

Heparin-bonded ePTFE endoluminal femoro-popliteal bypass versus surgical femoro-popliteal bypass

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Heparin-bonded ePTFE endoluminal fem-pop bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Heparin-bonded ePTFE endoluminal femoropopliteal bypass versus surgical femoropopliteal bypass

Surgical femoro-popliteal bypass

Surgical femoro-popliteal bypass.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical femoro-popliteal bypass.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical femoro-popliteal bypass.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Heparin-bonded ePTFE endoluminal fem-pop bypass

Heparin-bonded ePTFE endoluminal femoropopliteal bypass versus surgical femoropopliteal bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical femoro-popliteal bypass.

Surgical femoro-popliteal bypass.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age over 18 years
* Informed consent
* Novo stenosis, restenosis \>50% or occlusion of the native SFA, all \> 10cm in length
* Patent popliteal artery at the upper margin of the patella to the trifurcation
* Diameter native SFA and popliteal artery are 5.0-7.5 mm
* Indication for surgical bypass
* Distal run-off at least one crural artery without significant stenosis
* Ankle-brachial index (ABI) at rest \< 0.8 in the study limb prior to procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient unsuitable for administration of contrast agent
* Pregnancy
* Dementia or altered mental status that would prohibit giving conscious informed consent
* Need for adjunctive major surgical or vascular procedures within one month
* Untreated flow-limiting aortoiliac occlusive disease
* Perioperative unsuccessful ipsilateral percutaneous vascular procedure to treat inflow disease just prior to enrollment
* Femoral or popliteal aneurysm of target vessel
* Non-arthrotic disease resulting in occlusion (e.g. embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis)
* Severe medical comorbidities (untreated CAD/CHF, severe COPD, metastatic malignancies, dementia etc.) or other medical condition that would preclude compliance with study protocol
* Major distal amputation (above the transmetatarsal) in the study limb
* Any previously known coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability
* Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
* Known allergies to stent/stent-graft components
* History of prior life-threatening reaction to contrast agent
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to heparin, including those patients who have had a previous incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II
* Planned surgical procedure or major amputation to occur after enrollment of the patient
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rijnstate Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michel Reijnen

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MMJP Reijnen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rijnstate Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rijnstate Hospital

Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Slingeland Hospital

Doetinchem, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Isala klinieken

Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands

Site Status

Nij Smellinghe Hospital

Drachten, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands

Site Status

Antonius Hospital

Sneek, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Centre Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Walraven LA, Velandia-Sanchez A, Iqbal K, Zeebregts CJ, Holewijn S, Reijnen MMPJ. Impact on Hospital Resource Utilization of Endoluminal Bypass Using the Viabahn Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface Compared With Surgical Femoropopliteal Bypass. J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Apr 9:15266028241245602. doi: 10.1177/15266028241245602. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38590283 (View on PubMed)

Lensvelt MM, Holewijn S, Fritschy WM, Wikkeling OR, van Walraven LA, Wallis de Vries BM, Zeebregts CJ, Reijnen MM. SUrgical versus PERcutaneous Bypass: SUPERB-trial; Heparin-bonded endoluminal versus surgical femoro-popliteal bypass: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Jul 18;12:178. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-178.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21767371 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

721-070910

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

BPA vs. PEA in CTEPH
NCT05110066 RECRUITING NA
Stellarex Vascular E-Registry
NCT02769273 COMPLETED
SuperNOVA Clinical Stenting Trial
NCT01292928 COMPLETED NA