Comparison of a Lithotripsy vs Standard Preparation Followed by Stenting With Supera Stent in Femoropopliteal Lesions
NCT ID: NCT06112171
Last Updated: 2025-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-13
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to standard lesion preparation using standard and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. All patients will receive subsequent Supera stent implantation at the operator's discretion. Additional standard nitinol bare metal stent (BMS), drug-eluting stent or covered stent implantation is at the operator's discretion.
Patients will be stratified for total occlusions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Shockwave IVL + DES
NCT05291247
ULTRASCORE™ Focused Force PTA Balloon Angioplasty for CLI Patients With Below the Knee Vessel Disease
NCT04631848
Shockwave ®S4 Catheter IVL to Treat Infrapopliteal Calcified Stenoses and/or Occlusions in CLTI Patients (LEGACY)
NCT05755412
Angioplasty With Shockwave IVL Catheter System in Femoropopliteal Lesions
NCT06713850
Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries
NCT01412541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intravascular lithotripsy arm
Treatment with Lithotripsy system followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.
Intravascular lithotripsy
Lesion preparation with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System
Standard lesion preparation arm
Treatment with Balloon angioplasty with a conventional and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.
Standard lesion preparation
Lesion preparation with Standard and/or High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intravascular lithotripsy
Lesion preparation with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System
Standard lesion preparation
Lesion preparation with Standard and/or High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved inform consent form
* Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing
* Rutherford Classification 2-5
* Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion in SFA and/or PPA not exceeding the medial femoral epicondyle with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically
* No previous stent in the target lesion, if target vessel was previously stented the stent should be at least 3cm apart
* Target lesion length is ≥ 10cm, no maximum lesion length limit
* Severe calcification on fluoroscopy defined by PACSS Grade 4: 1) bilateral calcification and 2) extending ≥50mm in length
* Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion
* Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
* Patency of at least one infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery
* A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment (both intraluminal and subintimal crossing allowed)
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion
* Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
* Presence of a stent in the target lesion, at least 3cm from any previously stent in target vessel
* Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion
* Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
* Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study that has not reached the primary endpoint
* Life expectancy of less than one year
* Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
* Rutherford Classification of 0, 1, or 6
* Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
* Receiving immunosuppressant therapy
* Pregnant or breast-feeding females
* History of major amputation (defined as amputation above ankle joint) in the same limb as the target lesion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leipzig
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Leipzig
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Clinic Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIP_23/001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.