Sirolimus- vs. Paclitaxel-Drug Coated Ballons in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease
NCT ID: NCT04475783
Last Updated: 2025-12-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
478 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-13
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Magic Touch PTA sirolimus drug-coated balloon in comparison to the treatment with PTX drug-coated balloon (control device) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The rationale of this study is based on the hypothesis that the usage of the Sirolimus-coated Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB is at least equal (non-inferior) with regards to efficacy and safety in comparison with a clinically well-established PTX coated balloon.
The objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study is to compare the Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB with Paclitaxel-coated DCB for treatment of high grade ste-notic or occluded lesions in SFA and / or P1 segment of the popliteal artery (PA) in PAD pa-tients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sirolomus DCB group
Intervention with Sirolimus-coated balloon catheter
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)
PTA with an drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) in the femoropopliteal artery
Paclitaxel DCB group
Intervention with Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)
PTA with an drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) in the femoropopliteal artery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)
PTA with an drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) in the femoropopliteal artery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject has been informed on the nature of the study, the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, agrees to complete the required testing, agrees to participate, and has signed an informed consent form.
3. Rutherford category 2-4 according to the investigator's subjective evaluation
4. Subject has a de novo or re-stenosed lesion with ≥ 70 % stenosis documented angiographically
5. Target lesion length is ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 20 cm by visual estimate of the treating physician
6. Multiple lesions with max. 3 cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 20 cm
7. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
8. Patency of P2 and P3 segment of the popliteal artery and at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50 % diameter stenosis) in continuity with the femoropopliteal artery
9. Patency of ipsilateral iliac artery (≤ 30% diameter stenosis). Iliac artery stenosis \> 30 % may be treated during the index procedure to ensure sufficient inflow.
10. A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment intraluminal
11. Vascular disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the time point of index procedure is allowed, but has to be treated according to randomization or with POBA.
12. A patient can only be enrolled and randomized once with only one target lesion in the SIRONA trial. Please note that only the lesion in one limb can be treated as target lesion for index procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Flow-limiting dissection after pre-dilatation
3. Angiographic evidence of severe calcification of the target vessel (contiguous calcification on both sides of the vessel)
4. Presence of fresh thrombus in the target lesion
5. Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
6. Prior vascular surgery (including atherectomy, bypass surgery) of the target limb
7. Prior stent in the target lesion
8. Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
9. Any vascular surgical procedure or intervention performed in the target limb within 30 days prior to or planned within 30 days post index procedure
10. Any vascular treatment with PTX or sirolimus-coated devices 60 days prior to index procedure
11. Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as primary stenting, laser, lithotripsy, thrombectomy, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices
12. Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study
13. Life expectancy of less than one year in the investigator's opinion
14. Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, sirolimus, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
15. Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
16. Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy
17. Pregnant or lactating females
18. History of major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Concept Medical Inc.
INDUSTRY
Vascuscience
UNKNOWN
CoreLab Black Forest
UNKNOWN
Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital
UNKNOWN
Jena University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ulf Teichgräber
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulf Teichgraeber, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Hospital Jena, Institute of Radiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University Vienna, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Medizinische Universität Graz, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
Graz, , Austria
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Klagenfurt, , Austria
Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinische Abteilung für Kardiovaskuläre und Interventionelle Radiologie
Vienna, , Austria
Hanusch-Krankenhaus
Vienna, , Austria
University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, , Germany
Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Diabetologie, Neurologie und Intensivmedizin
Bruchsal, , Germany
Sana Kliniken Oberfranken Coburg
Coburg, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Dresden, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Westdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Essen, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie
Essen, , Germany
DIAKO Krankenhaus gGmbH, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie
Flensburg, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie
Heidelberg, , Germany
Klinikverbund Allgäu gGmbH, Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Oberallgäu Kempten, Klinik Immenstadt
Immenstadt im Allgäu, , Germany
University Hospital Jena
Jena, , Germany
Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Krefeld, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Angiologie
Leipzig, , Germany
Marienhaus Klinikum Mainz, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Mainz, , Germany
St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
Münster, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Kardiologie I, Koronare Herzkrankheit, Herzinsuffizienz und Angiologie
Münster, , Germany
Elblandklinikum Radebeul, Gefäßzentrum
Radebeul, , Germany
Schön Klinik Rendsburg, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie
Rendsburg, , Germany
Kreiskrankenhaus Torgau, Abt. Innere Medizin / Angiologie
Torgau, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Teichgraber U, Ingwersen M, Platzer S, Lehmann T, Zeller T, Aschenbach R, Scheinert D. Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery: study protocol for the randomized controlled SIRONA trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 28;22(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05631-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DRKS00022452
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ZKSJ0127
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id