Angioplasty With Shockwave IVL Catheter System in Femoropopliteal Lesions

NCT ID: NCT06713850

Last Updated: 2024-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-01

Study Completion Date

2028-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is a lack of prospective observational studies of shockwave balloons in the treatment of moderate-to-severe calcification of the femoral popliteal artery at the international level. Therefore, in this study, we wish to set up a real-world study of shockwave balloon in the treatment of moderate-to-severe calcification to investigate the real-world efficacy of shockwave balloon in the treatment of moderate-to-severe calcified lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Vascular calcification is prevalent in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), especially those with comorbid diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Severe calcification portends a poor prognosis and is independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Calcification may also compromise the efficacy of endoluminal therapy, leading to suboptimal vasodilatation and an increased risk of vascular complications, including restenosis, as well as entrapment, perforation, and distal embolization. The current grading of vascular calcification is based on the PACSS score, which can be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe depending on the degree of calcification and the extent of the lesion. Neither high-pressure balloon angioplasty nor plaque resection (atherectomy) significantly improves severely calcified lesions. The efficacy of these treatment modalities has also not been validated in multicenter real-world studies. Shockwave balloons have been widely used in the clinical endoluminal treatment of severely calcified lesions due to their ability to significantly disrupt calcified structures while reducing damage to the vascular intima, thereby reducing postoperative complications. The current published study Disrupt PAD III Trial (NCT02923193) of shockwave balloon treatment of calcified lesions demonstrated a lower residual stenosis rate with shockwave balloon versus balloon dilatation alone in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (66.4% vs. 51.9%; p = 0.02), limiting the number of patients who could be treated with shockwave balloon. p = 0.02), a lower incidence of flow-limiting entrapment (1.4% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03), and a lower rate of posterior dilation and remedial stenting (5.2% vs. 17.0%; p = 0.001); (4.6% vs. 18.3%; p \< 0.001). Shockwave balloons have been approved by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration for endoluminal treatment of severe calcification of the femoropopliteal artery, and are currently used only in larger vascular surgery centers because of their short time on the market. On this basis, we asked whether we could set up a real-world study of shockwave balloons for the treatment of moderate-to-severe calcification to investigate the real-world efficacy of shockwave balloons in the treatment of moderate-to-severe calcified lesions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shockwave balloons

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Shockwave intraperipheral shockwave catheter system in peripheral arterial angioplasty.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

1\) Age ≥ 18 years (2) Rutherford Classification 2-5 3) Stenosis (\>70% stenosis confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) imaging) or occlusion of the femoropopliteal artery, with one healthy patent outflow tract distal to the knee in continuity with a patent outflow tract below the ankle.

(4) Patients who understand the purpose of the study, participate in the experiment voluntarily, sign the informed consent form and are willing to be followed up.

5\) The guidewire needs to pass through the lesion; 6) Life expectancy \>24 months 7) Moderately severe calcified lesions confirmed by imaging data: 8) For patients who receive intervention in both lower extremities may be enrolled in order of time of intracavitary treatment 9) For combined aortoiliac artery lesions that have undergone endoluminal revascularization to achieve flow recanalization without more than 50% residual stenosis.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or cardiac infarction within 3 months prior to enrollment (2) Patients with known allergy to heparin, aspirin, other antiplatelet drugs, contrast agents, etc.

3\) Patients who have been enrolled in medications that interfere with this clinical trial within the last 3 months or who have been treated intraoperatively with other special vascular bed preparation devices, such as plaque volume reduction devices, special balloons, and so on; 4) Pregnant and lactating women 5) Patients who are unable or unwilling to participate in this trial. 6) patients with Berger's disease 7) patients who have received arterial bypass diversion on the treated side
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Huashan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The General Hospital of Southern Theater Command

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zibo Feng

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zibo Feng, MD

Role: CONTACT

86-13545160302

Ye Du, DM

Role: CONTACT

86-15827105515

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zibo Feng, MD

Role: primary

86-13545160302

Ye Du, MD

Role: backup

86-15827105515

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

the SHIELD study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id