Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease
NCT ID: NCT02701543
Last Updated: 2023-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
414 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Ranger™ Drug Coated Balloon in comparison to the IN.PACT™ Drug Coated Balloon in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease.
All enrolled subjects will be followed through to 24 months to assess the incidence of restenosis by ultrasound and major adverse events (MAE). Follow-up visits occur at 1, 6, 12 and 24-month intervals per local standard of care. Telephone follow-up visits will occur at 36, 48 and 60 month.
Up to 414 patients will be enrolled at approximately 10-18 sites in Germany for comparison between the following two groups:
Treatment with the Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, USA) vs. the IN.PACT™ Drug Eluting Balloon (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MI, USA).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon
Intervention with Over the Wire (OTW) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA )balloon catheter with a semi-compliant balloon coated with a formulation of 2μg/mm2 paclitaxel and acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate (ATBC) as carrier substance
Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon
Intervention with Over the Wire (OTW) peripheral balloon catheter. The balloon surface is coated with a formulation of 3μg/mm2 paclitaxel and urea as carrier substance.
In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing Rutherford category 2-4.
3. Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion.
4. Target lesion length is ≤ 30cm
5. Target lesion is at least 1cm below the origin of the profunda femoris and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle.
6. Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 30 cm.
7. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation.
8. Patency of at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery.
9. A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Angiographic evidence of severe calcification
3. Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion.
4. Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
5. Presence of a stent in the target lesion
6. Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion.
7. Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
8. Any surgical procedure or intervention performed within 30 days prior to or post index procedure
9. Superficial femoropopliteal Artery or Proximal popliteal artery disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the index procedure
10. Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as stenting, laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices
11. Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study
12. Life expectancy of less than one year
13. Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
14. Rutherford classification of 0, 1, 5 or 6.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leipzig
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dierk Scheinert
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dierk Scheinert, Prof.Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Leipzig
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Clinic Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Steiner S, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Tepe G, Thieme M, Maiwald L, Schroder H, Euringer W, Popescu C, Brechtel K, Brucks S, Blessing E, Schuster J, Langhoff R, Schellong S, Weiss N, Beschorner U, Wittig T, Scheinert D. Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 24;15(20):2093-2102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Steiner S, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Tepe G, Thieme M, Maiwald L, Schroder H, Euringer W, Ulrich M, Brechtel K, Brucks S, Blessing E, Schuster J, Langhoff R, Schellong S, Weiss N, Scheinert D. COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2541-2552. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIP_14/001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id