Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries
NCT ID: NCT01412541
Last Updated: 2020-05-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
532 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy of the SurVeil™ Drug-Coated Balloon
NCT03241459
Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis
NCT02063672
IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA)
NCT01566461
Drug Coated Balloons for Prevention of Restenosis
NCT00696956
Paclitaxel-coated Balloons in Femoral Indication to Defeat Restenosis
NCT01083030
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Moxy Drug Coated Balloon
Paclitaxel coated balloon catheter
Moxy Drug Coated Balloon
Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to the drug coated or standard angioplasty balloon
Standard Uncoated Angioplasty Balloon
PTA Catheter
Standard Uncoated Angioplasty Balloon
Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon or Standard Angioplasty Balloon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard Uncoated Angioplasty Balloon
Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon or Standard Angioplasty Balloon
Moxy Drug Coated Balloon
Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to the drug coated or standard angioplasty balloon
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Rutherford Clinical Category 2-4;
3. Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen;
4. Length ≤15 cm;
5. Up to two focal lesions or segments within the designated 15 cm length of vessel may be treated (e.g. two discrete segments, separated by several cm, but both falling within a composite length of ≤15 cm);
6. ≥70% stenosis by visual estimate;
7. Lesion location starts ≥1 cm below the common femoral bifurcation and terminates distally ≤2 cm below the tibial plateau AND ≥1 cm above the origin of the TP trunk;
8. de novo lesion(s) or non-stented restenotic lesion(s) \>90 days from prior angioplasty procedure;
9. Lesion is located at least 3 cm from any stent, if target vessel was previously stented;
10. Target vessel diameter between ≥4 and ≤6 mm and able to be treated with available device size matrix;
11. Successful, uncomplicated (without use of a crossing device) antegrade wire crossing of lesion;
12. A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography (treatment of target lesion acceptable after successful treatment of inflow artery lesions); NOTE: Successful inflow artery treatment is defined as attainment of residual diameter stenosis ≤30% without death or major vascular complication.
13. At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle, free from significant (≥50%) stenosis as confirmed by angiography that has not previously been revascularized (treatment of outflow disease is NOT permitted during the index procedure);
14. Contralateral limb lesion(s) cannot be treated within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment in order to avoid confounding complications;
15. No other prior vascular interventions within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant or men intending to father children;
2. Life expectancy of \<5 years;
3. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study; NOTE: Enrollment in another clinical trial during the follow up period is not allowed.
4. History of hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months;
5. Previous or planned surgical or interventional procedure within 2 weeks before or within 30 days after the index procedure;
6. History of myocardial infarction (MI), thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of enrollment;
7. Rutherford Class 0, 1, 5 or 6;
8. Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with modification in diet in renal disease glomerular filtration rate (MDRD GFR) ≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (or serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/L within 30 days of index procedure or treated with dialysis);
9. Prior vascular surgery of the index limb, with the exception of remote common femoral patch angioplasty separated by at least 2 cm from the target lesion;
10. Inability to take required study medications or allergy to contrast that cannot be adequately managed with pre- and post-procedure medication;
11. Anticipated use of IIb/IIIa inhibitor prior to randomization;
12. Ipsilateral retrograde access;
13. Composite lesion length is \>15 cm or there is no normal proximal arterial segment in which duplex flow velocity can be measured;
14. Significant inflow disease. Successful treatment of inflow disease allowed prior to target lesion treatment;
15. Known inadequate distal outflow (\>50 % stenosis of distal popliteal and/or all three tibial vessels), or planned future treatment of vascular disease distal to the target lesion;
16. Sudden symptom onset, acute vessel occlusion, or acute or sub-acute thrombus in target vessel;
17. Severe calcification that renders the lesion un-dilatable;
18. Use of adjunctive treatment modalities (i.e. laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, scoring/cutting balloon, etc.).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
C. R. Bard
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kenneth Rosenfield, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Prof. Dierk Scheinert
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Leipzig
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Good Samaritan Hospital
Los Angeles, California, United States
North County Radiology Medial Group Inc.
Oceanside, California, United States
St. Joseph's Hospital
Orange, California, United States
University of California Davis
Sacramento, California, United States
Medical Center of the Rockies
Loveland, Colorado, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Washington Cardiology Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Heart and Vascular Institute
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Interventional Cardiolgists of Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Munroe Regional Medical Center
Ocala, Florida, United States
Cardiovascular Associates
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States
Edward Heart
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States
St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Allen County Cardiology
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Promise Regional Medical Center
Hutchinson, Kansas, United States
St. Francis Heart & Vascular Center
Topeka, Kansas, United States
Massachusetts Genearl Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Detroit Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, United States
St. John's Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Michigan Heart
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Mercy Hosptial
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States
Forrest General Hospital
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Deborah Heart and Lung Center
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Columbia Universtiy Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Wake Heart and Vascular
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Christ Hospital / The Lindner Clinical Trial Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Mid Ohio Cardiology and Vascular Consultants
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Jobst Vascular Institute
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Univesrity of Toledo Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Greenville Memorial Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Wellmont Cardiology Services
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
East Tennessee Heart Consultants
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Baptist DeSoto in Southaven
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Austin Heart P.A.
Austin, Texas, United States
Medical University of Graz
Graz, , Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, , Austria
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden, , Belgium
Flanders Medical Research Program
Dendermonde, , Belgium
Herz-Zentrum
Bad Krozingen, , Germany
Jewish Hospital
Berlin, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, , Germany
Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg
Flensburg, , Germany
Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center
Hamburg, , Germany
University Leipzig
Leipzig, , Germany
University Magdeburg
Magdeburg, , Germany
University of Tübingen
Tübingen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ouriel K, Adelman MA, Rosenfield K, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Pena C, Geraghty P, Lee A, White R, Clair DG. Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 23;12(24):2515-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
Scheinert D, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Sixt S, Schroder H, Weiss N, Ketelsen D, Ricke J, Steiner S, Rosenfield K. German Center Subanalysis of the LEVANT 2 Global Randomized Study of the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;23(3):409-16. doi: 10.1177/1526602816644592. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, Rocha-Singh K, Mena-Hurtado C, Metzger DC, Brodmann M, Pilger E, Zeller T, Krishnan P, Gammon R, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Nehler MR, Benenati JF, Scheinert D; LEVANT 2 Investigators. Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):145-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406235. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CL0002-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.