LEVANT 2 Continuation Registry of the Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon (DCB)

NCT ID: NCT01628159

Last Updated: 2020-04-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

657 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to collect additional safety and efficacy information on the Lutonix (formerly Moxy) Drug Coated Balloon for treatment of stenosis or occlusion of the femoral and popliteal arteries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of the study is to collect additional safety and efficacy information on the Lutonix (formerly Moxy) Drug Coated Balloon for treatment of stenosis or occlusion of the femoral and popliteal arteries through 5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon

Formerly called the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon, the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon (Lutonix DCB) is a paclitaxel coated balloon catheter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

balloon angioplasty with a drug coated balloon

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon

balloon angioplasty with a drug coated balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Moxy Drug Coated Balloon

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age;
2. Rutherford Clinical Category 2-4;
3. Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen;

4. Length ≤15 cm;
5. Up to two focal lesions or segments within the designated 15 cm length of vessel may be treated (e.g. two discrete segments, separated by several cm, but both falling within a composite length of \<15 cm);
6. ≥70% stenosis by visual estimate;
7. Lesion location starts ≥1 cm below the common femoral bifurcation and terminates distally ≤2 cm below the tibial plateau AND ≥1 cm above the origin of the TP trunk;
8. de novo lesion(s) or non-stented restenotic lesion(s) \>90 days from prior angioplasty procedure;
9. Lesion is located at least 3 cm from any stent, if target vessel was previously stented;
10. Target vessel diameter between ≥4 and ≤6 mm and able to be treated with available device size matrix;
11. Successful, uncomplicated (without use of a crossing device) antegrade wire crossing of lesion;
12. A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography (treatment of target lesion acceptable after successful treatment of inflow artery lesions); NOTE: Successful inflow artery treatment is defined as attainment of residual diameter stenosis ≤30% without death or major vascular complication.
13. At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle, free from significant (≥50%) stenosis as confirmed by angiography that has not previously been revascularized (treatment of outflow disease is NOT permitted during the index procedure);
14. Contralateral limb lesion(s) cannot be treated within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment in order to avoid confounding complications;
15. No other prior vascular interventions within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded if ANY of the following conditions apply:

1. Pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant or men intending to father children;
2. Life expectancy of \<5 years;
3. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study; NOTE: Enrollment in another clinical trial during the follow up period is not allowed.
4. History of hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months;
5. Previous or planned surgical or interventional procedure within 2 weeks before or within 30 days after the index procedure;
6. History of MI, thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of enrollment;
7. Rutherford Class 0, 1, 5 or 6;
8. Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with MDRD GFR ≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (or serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/L within 30 days of index procedure or treated with dialysis);
9. Prior vascular surgery of the index limb, with the exception of remote common femoral patch angioplasty separated by at least 2 cm from the target lesion;
10. Inability to take required study medications or allergy to contrast that cannot be adequately managed with pre- and post-procedure medication;
11. Anticipated use of IIb/IIIa inhibitor prior to randomization;
12. Ipsilateral retrograde access;
13. Composite lesion length is \>15 cm or there is no normal proximal arterial segment in which duplex flow velocity can be measured;
14. Significant inflow disease. Successful treatment of inflow disease allowed prior to target lesion treatment;
15. Known inadequate distal outflow (\>50 % stenosis of distal popliteal and/or all three tibial vessels), or planned future treatment of vascular disease distal to the target lesion;
16. Sudden symptom onset, acute vessel occlusion, or acute or sub-acute thrombus in target vessel;
17. Severe calcification that renders the lesion un-dilatable;
18. Use of adjunctive treatment modalities (i.e. laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, scoring/cutting balloon, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

C. R. Bard

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Rosenfield, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Prof. Dierk Scheinert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Leipzig

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Good Samaritan Hospital

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

North County Radiology Medial Group Inc.

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

University of California Davis

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of the Rockies

Loveland, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington Cardiology Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Heart and Vascular Institute

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Interventional Cardiolgists of Gainesville

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Munroe Regional Medical Center

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cardiovascular Associates

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Advocate Christ Medical Center

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Edward Heart / Midwest Research Foundation

Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. John's Hosptial

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Allen County Cardiology

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent Heart Center of Indianapolis

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Promise Regional Medical Center

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

Site Status

St. Francis Heart & Vascular Center

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts Genearl Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit Medical Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. John's Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan Heart

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mercy Hosptial

Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Forrest General Hospital

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Deborah Heart and Lung Center

Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia Universtiy Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Wake Heart and Vascular

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Christ Hospital / The Lindner Clinical Trial Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mid Ohio Cardiology and Vascular Consultants

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Jobst Vascular Institute

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Univesrity of Toledo Medical Center

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Greenville Memorial Hospital

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wellmont Cardiology Services

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

East Tennessee Heart Consultants

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin Heart P.A.

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Medical University of Graz

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Klinikum Klagenfurt

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

OLV Ziekenhuis

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Imelda Ziekenhuis

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Flanders Medical Research Program

Dendermonde, , Belgium

Site Status

Hospital Oost-Limburg

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Herz-Zentrum

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Jewish Hospital

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg

Flensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinical Center Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Herz-Und Gefasszentrum

Immenstadt im Allgäu, , Germany

Site Status

Practice for Interventional Radiology

Kaiserslautern, , Germany

Site Status

Westpfalz Clinic

Kusen, , Germany

Site Status

University Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

University Magdeburg

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

University of Munich

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Universtiy Clinic Muenster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Ernst von Bergham Clinic

Potstdam, , Germany

Site Status

University of Tübingen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Canton Hospital Lucerne

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

University Hospital, Zurich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Belgium Germany Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ouriel K, Adelman MA, Rosenfield K, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Pena C, Geraghty P, Lee A, White R, Clair DG. Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 23;12(24):2515-2524. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31575518 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CL0002-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lutonix Global SFA Registry
NCT01864278 COMPLETED