Study Comparing Legflow Versus Bare Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Atherosclerotic Disease
NCT ID: NCT02710656
Last Updated: 2020-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2019-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DCB Compared Stenting in Popliteal Lesions
NCT03739580
Constrained Balloon Combined With Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Lesion
NCT05894460
Clinical Of Plain Balloon Dilatation Combined Stent Versus Endovascular Debulking Combined Drug-coated Balloon to Treat Arteriosclerosis Occlusive Disease of Lower Extremity
NCT05158257
SIGNATURE Study : DCB (Legflow) vs POBA in Fempop Arteries
NCT04971772
Drug Coated Ballon in Critical Limb Ischemia
NCT04737291
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of this randomized study is to compare the efficacy of the DCB (Legflow - Cardionovum) versus POBA for the treatment of de novo lesions or restenosis in the SFA and in the popliteal artery (segment P1 -P2) by assessing the binary restenosis rate with duplex ultrasonography at 12 months.
The secondary endpoints are the assessment of the immediate procedural outcome, distribution of Rutherford, mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target extremity revascularization (TER), amputation and anklebrachial index (ABI).
For each patient enrolled, data will be collected up to 12 months after the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) - Legflow®
Percutaneous balloon angioplasty performed with the investigational device, the paclitaxel eluting Legflow® balloon.
Legflow® balloon
Percutaneous angioplasty performed with a Drug coated balloon (DCB) with Paclitaxel
Standard PTA - POBA
Percutaneous balloon angioplasty performed with the clinical standard, that is, a non-drug eluting balloon (POBA, plain old balloon angioplasty).
Standard PTA
Percutaneous angioplasty performed with a standard balloon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Legflow® balloon
Percutaneous angioplasty performed with a Drug coated balloon (DCB) with Paclitaxel
Standard PTA
Percutaneous angioplasty performed with a standard balloon
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient must be older than 18 years.
3. Patient with Rutherford 2, 3 and 4..
4. Target lesion is an occlusion or ≥70% stenosis (visual estimate) located in SFA or popliteal artery (P1 -P2).
5. Maximum length of the target lesion is 13 cm.
6. Target lesion is TASC A, B or C.
7. Target lesion is a de novo lesion or restenotic lesion (previously POBA treated, in-stent restenosis is not allowed).
8. Inflow arteries are free from hemodynamically significant obstruction (i.e. ≥ 50% diameter stenosis). It is allowed to treat inflow lesions during the index-procedure if the result is ≤ 30% diameter stenosis (treatment with DCB or DES is not allowed). Treatment of a non-target lesion in the target vessel is allowed if the nontarget lesion is considered to be an inflow lesion.
9. Popliteal artery P3 segment (below knee popliteal artery) is free from hemodynamically significant obstruction (i.e. ≥ 50%). Treatment of a lesion in this segment is not allowed during the index-procedure.
10. At least 1 patent (\< 50% diameter stenosis) below-the-knee vessel (anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery) till the ankle as confirmed by baseline angiography.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient has a known intolerance to antiplatelet therapy or contrast agent.
3. Patient with known sensitivity to Paclitaxel.
4. Patient is pregnant or patient intends to become pregnant within 1 year after the index-procedure.
5. Patient takes esomeprazole or omeprazole.
6. Patient with serum creatinine \>2.0 mg/dL or renal dialysis.
7. Patient suffers from acute limb ischemia defined as any sudden decrease in limb perfusion causing a potential threat to limb viability.
8. Patient has a life expectancy \<2 years.
9. Patient with Rutherford 0, 1 , 5 and 6.
10. Patient has a target lesion that is severely calcified (grade 3 and grade 4).
11. Patient with a TASC D lesion.
12. Patient has an acute thrombus or aneurysm in the target vessel.
13. Patient has a target lesion that cannot be crossed with a guidewire.
14. Target vessel has been treated previously with a DCB or a DES.
15. Treatment of outflow lesions during the index-procedure.
16. Patients with significant disease of all 3 infrapopliteal vessels (i.e. ≥ 50% diameter stenosis in each vessel).
17. Any scheduled surgery within 3 months after the index-procedure that would necessitate the discontinuation of clopidogrel.
18. Patients with previous bypass surgery involving the SFA.
19. Patient has cirrhosis of the liver.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Archer Research
INDUSTRY
Cardionovum GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Goverde, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ZNA Stuivenberg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ZNA Stuivenberg
Antwerp, , Belgium
AZ Sint-Jan
Bruges, , Belgium
ZOL (Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg)
Genk, , Belgium
Jessa hospital
Hasselt, , Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeau, , France
CHU Cermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
CH Mont-de-Marsan
Mont-de-Marsan, , France
Klinikum Arnsberg
Arnsberg, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MAGNIFICENT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.