Evaluation of Paclitaxel Eluting Stent vs Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Treating Peripheral Artery Disease of the Femoral Artery

NCT ID: NCT01728441

Last Updated: 2014-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective of the REAL PTX trial is to compare paclitaxel-eluting stents to paclitaxel-eluting balloons for treating symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal artery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The REAL PTX trial has been designed as prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study investigating the effect of the paclitaxel-eluting stent Zilver® PTX® (DES)in comparison to the use of a paclitaxel eluting balloon (DEB)in treating symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal artery.

Up to 150 patients will be enrolled in Germany and Belgium. Enrollment is expected to be completed within approximately six months of initiating the study.

One group (DES or DEB) will be considered to yield significantly better results of the primary patency rate than the other group at 12 months follow up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paclitaxel Eluting Stent

Patients randomized to treatment with paclitaxel eluting stent will receive the Zilver® PTX® stent.Primary stenting should be performed covering the full lesion. Post-dilatation is at the investigator's discretion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paclitaxel Eluting Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon

For patients randomized to treatment with drug eluting balloon (DEB), angioplasty (ballooning) should be performed covering the full lesion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paclitaxel Eluting Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zilver PTX stent

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject age ≥ 18
* Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form.
* Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing.
* Rutherford category 2-5.
* Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion.
* Target lesion is at least 1cm below the origin of the profunda femoris and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle.
* A single target lesion (stenotic areas separated by more than 3 cm with ≤ 30% stenosis might, at the decision of the investigator, be considered as 2 lesions).
* Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual assessment.
* Patency of at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (\< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery.
* A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to obtain informed consent.
* Life expectancy \< 12 months.
* Pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, or breastfeeding during study period (patients of childbearing potential must have negative serum pregnancy test 7 days prior to treatment).
* Presence of one or more of the following co-morbid factors: hemodialysis dependence, renal insufficiency with a serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dl, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 1 month of procedure or any CVA resulting in unresolved walking impairment, and/or myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 month of procedure.
* Any evidence of hemodynamic instability prior to procedure/randomization.
* Coagulopathy or clotting disorders.
* Present or suspected systemic infection or osteomyelitis affecting target limb.
* Contraindication to contrast media or any study-required medication (antiplatelets, anticoagulants, thrombolytics, etc).
* Hypersensitivity to nitinol and/or paclitaxel.
* Enrollment into another study.
* Intervention of the target lesion less than 90 days prior of the study procedure.


* Untreated external iliac artery inflow lesion (study allows for successful treatment prior to study treatment procedures).
* Total occlusion uncrossable by a conventional guidewire.
* Acute occlusive intraluminal thrombosis of the proposed lesion site.
* Evidence of an aneurysm at the target lesion site.
* Perforation in the target vessel as evidenced by the extravasation of contrast.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

William Cook Europe

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Provascular GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dierk Scheinert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Park Hospital Leipzig

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Imelda Hospital

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Sint-Blasius Department of Vascular Surgery

Dendermonde, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitäts Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen Abteilung Angiologie

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Angiologikum Hamburg Centre for Interventional Vascular Medicine

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Park-Krankenhaus Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bausback Y, Wittig T, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Bosiers M, Peeters P, Brucks S, Lottes AE, Scheinert D, Steiner S. Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon Revascularization in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):667-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.039.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30765033 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1136-8610

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Prov 01-2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Zilver® PTX™ Global Registry
NCT01094678 COMPLETED NA
Zilver® PTX® in China
NCT02171962 COMPLETED NA