A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux Drug-coated Balloon of Biotronik in the Treatment of the Femoropopliteal Artery Compared to the Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral Drug-coated Balloon.
NCT ID: NCT03884257
Last Updated: 2024-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
302 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-18
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An expected total of 151 patients will be treated with the Passeo-18 Lux and compared to a control group of another 151 patients that will be treated with the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon of Medtronic. Assignment to the treatment groups will be at random. The study will be conducted in two phases. A first pilot study phase of 120 patients distributed evenly over both treatment groups and a second phase to formally test the non-inferiority hypothesis.
The balloon is coated with Paclitaxel intended to avoid cellular proliferation. The drug is released by means of rapid inflation as to release a high dose in a short amount of time. Patients will be invited for a follow-up visit at 1, 6 and 12 months post-procedure.
The primary efficacy endpoints are defined as follows. Freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days post-index procedure, major target limb amputation through 12 months post-procedure and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization through 12 months post-index procedure. The secondary endpoints are defined as acute device success, acute procedural success , freedom from all cause of death, major target limb amputation and clinically driven target vessel revascularisation through 30 days post-procedure, sustained clinical improvement, no major adverse events through 6 and 12 months post-procedure, primary patency, target lesion revascularisation, target vessel revascularisation, binary restenosis, major target limb amputation, thrombosis at target lesion, change of walking impairment questionnaire score from baseline, change in target limb rutherford classification or ABI.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physician-Initiated Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Stenotic Disease With the Biotronik Passeo-18 Lux Drug Releasing Balloon and the Biotronik Pulsar-18 Stent (Comparing With 4EVER Trial Results)
NCT02211664
Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Angioplasty With a Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon for Femoral Artery In-stent Restenosis
NCT01305070
IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA)
NCT01566461
Drug-Eluting Balloon Catheters and the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
NCT01007578
Evaluation of Paclitaxel Eluting Stent vs Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Treating Peripheral Artery Disease of the Femoral Artery
NCT01728441
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients will be selected based on the investigator's assessment, evaluation of the underlying disease and the eligibility criteria. The patient's medical condition should be stable, with no underlying medical condition which would prevent them from performing the required testing or from completing the study. Patients should be geographically stable, willing and able to cooperate in this clinical study, and remain available for long term follow-up. The patient is considered enrolled in the study after obtaining the patients informed consent, if there is full compliance with the study eligibility criteria and after successful guidewire passage through the study target lesion.
Prior to the index procedure the following will be collected: an informed consent for data collection, demographics, medical history, medication record, physical examination, clinical category of acute limb ischemia (Rutherford category), the resting ankle-brachial index (ABI), blood sample test (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel and if applicable pregnancy test) and a walking impairment questionnaire.
During the procedure the guidewire will cross the entire study lesion after which the lesion will be assessed through angiography. A pre-dilatation with a standard non-drug-coated balloon will be performed followed by a dilatation of the lesion with either a Passeo-18 Lux (Biotronik) or an IN.PACT Admiral balloon (Medtronic). If dilatation was not successful (\>30% stenosis, perforation, occlusive or flow limiting dissection) prolonged inflation should be attempted after which bail-out stenting with a bare nitinol stent is allowed in case of inadequate results.
The regular follow-up is necessary to monitor the condition of the patient and the results of the procedure. The patients will be invited for the following required follow-up visits at 1,6 and 12 months. During these visit the following data will be collected: medication record, physical exam, target limb ABI and Rutherford classification, duplex ultrasound of target vessel, walking impairment questionnaire and possible adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Passeo-18 Lux treatment group
These patients will be treated with the Passeo-18 Lux (Biotronik).
Passeo-18 Lux treatment group
Percutaneous endovascular angioplasty with the Passeo-18 lux
IN.PACT Admiral treatment group
These patients will be treated with the IN.PACT Admiral (Medtronic).
IN.PACT Admiral treatment group
Percutaneous endovascular angioplasty with the IN.PACT Admiral
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Passeo-18 Lux treatment group
Percutaneous endovascular angioplasty with the Passeo-18 lux
IN.PACT Admiral treatment group
Percutaneous endovascular angioplasty with the IN.PACT Admiral
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject has Rutherford classification 2, 3 or 4
* Subject has provided written informed consent and is willing to comply with study follow- up requirements
* De novo stenotic or occlusive lesion(s) or non-stented restenotic or occlusive lesion(s) occurring \>90 days after prior plain old balloon (POBA) angioplasty or \>180 days after prior DCB treatment
* Target lesion is located between the ostium of the SFA and the end of the P1 segment of the popliteal artery
* Target vessel diameter ≥4mm and ≤7mm
* Target lesion must be stenotic lesion ≤180mm in length (one long lesion or tandem lesions) by investigator's visual estimate or a total occlusion ≤120mm in length by investigator's visual estimate.
Note: tandem lesions must have a total length of ≤180mm by visual estimate and be separated by ≤30mm
* Target lesion must have angiographic evidence of ≥70% stenosis by investigator's visual estimation
* Successful, uncomplicated crossing of the target lesion occurs when the tip of the guide wire is distal to the target lesion without the occurrence of flow-limiting dissection or perforation and is judged by visual inspection to be within the true lumen. Subintimal dissection techniques may be used if re-entry occurs above the knee (ATK) and without the use of re-entry devices
* Target lesion is located at least 30mm from any stent, if target vessel was previously stented
* After pre-dilatation, the target lesion is ≤50% residual stenosis, absence of a flow-limiting dissection and treatable with available device matrix
* A patent inflow artery free from significant stenosis (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography
* At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle or foot, free from significant stenosis (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient underwent an intervention involving the target vessel within the previous 90 days
* Patient underwent any lower extremity percutaneous treatment in the ipsilateral limb using a paclitaxel-eluting stent or DCB within the previous 90 days
* Patient underwent a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the target lesion using a DCB within the previous 180 days
* Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant
* Patient has life expectancy of less than 1 year
* Patient has a known allergy to contrast medium that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
* Patient is allergic to all antiplatelet treatments
* Patient is receiving immunosuppressant therapy
* Patient has platelet count \<100.000/mm3 or \>700.000/mm3
* Patient has history of gastrointestinal haemorrhage requiring a transfusion within 3 months prior to the study procedure
* Patient is diagnosed with coagulopathy that precludes treatment with systemic anticoagulation and/or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
* Patient has history of stroke within the past 90 days
* Patient has history of myocardial infarction within the past 30 days
* Patient is participating in an investigational drug or medical device study that has not completed primary endpoint(s) evaluation or that clinically interferes with the endpoints from this study, or patient is planning to participate in such study prior to the completion of this study
* Patient has had any major (e.g. cardiac, peripheral, abdominal) surgical procedure or intervention unrelated to this study within 30 days prior to the index procedure or has planned major surgical procedure or intervention within 30 days of the index procedure
* An intervention in the contralateral limb, planned within 30 days post-index procedure
* Patient had previous bypass surgery of the target lesion
* Patient had previous treatment of the target vessel with thrombolysis or surgery
* Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with procedures specified in the protocol or has difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits as specified by the protocol
* Target lesion involves an aneurysm or is adjacent to an aneurysm (within 5mm)
* Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapy such as stenting, laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy or re-entry devices
* Significant target vessel tortuosity or other parameters prohibiting access to the target lesion
* Presence of thrombus in the target vessel
* Iliac inflow disease requiring treatment, unless the iliac artery disease is successfully treated first during the index procedure. Success is defined as ≤30% residual diameter stenosis without death or major complications
* Presence of an aortic, iliac or femoral artificial graft
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ID3 Medical
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Koen Deloose, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AZ Sint-Blasius
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Graz
Graz, Graz, Austria
Hanusch Hospital
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
UZA
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst
Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden, , Belgium
A.Z. Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, , Belgium
Z.O.L.
Genk, , Belgium
R.Z. Heilig Hart
Tienen, , Belgium
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, Occitanie, France
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France
Hopital Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
Triemlispital Zürich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Deloose K, Lansink W, Brodmann M, Werner M, Keirse K, Goueffic Y, Verbist J, Maene L, Hendriks J, Brunet J, Ducasse E, Levent K, Sauguet A, Deglise S, Vandael F. Methodology of the BIOPACT RCT, a Multi-center, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) of Biotronik Compared to the Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral DCB in the Treatment of Subjects with Lesions of the Femoropopliteal Artery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Dec;45(12):1855-1859. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03259-z. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BIOPACT-RCT_V1.0_14DEC2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.