Angioplasty-stenting vs Optimal Medical Treatment on Post-thrombotic Syndrome Reduction

NCT ID: NCT04250025

Last Updated: 2023-12-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The project will highlight the potential benefit of endovascular therapy on post thrombotic syndrome reduction after proximal iliac DVT. There is actually not real standard of care for the treatment of this pathology. A clear evidence of efficacy of endovascular therapy will be of great benefit for both the patients and the healthcare system, and will provide new data for further international guidelines

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Benefit(s) for the individual:

Patients included in the experimental arm of the study will attempt to a strong reduction of PTS. In addition, all patients of the study will benefit from a careful follow-up thanks to the availability of physicians involved in the study, optimization of quality of compression therapy and anticoagulant treatment, and will be strongly encouraged to regular physical activity.

Group(s) Benefits:

About 100 000 to 150 000 persons develop VTE each year in France, among which about 5% will develop severe and disabling PTS. Validation of interventional therapy may provide a major clinical improvement for these patients in terms of morbidity and quality of life. The economic impact is likely to be improved.

Risk(s) to the individual(s)

The first risk is related to interventional treatment, i.e. haemorrhages or early DVT recurrence. The use of endovascular approach will reduce the haemorrhagic risk compared to open surgery, and the risk of recurrence will be controlled by anticoagulant.

The second risk is related to antithrombotic treatment, i.e. combination of aspirin plus anticoagulant, then anticoagulant alone. The combined therapy will be used during a short one-month treatment reducing the risk, and the patients are already trained to anticoagulant treatment. Moreover, it is attempted, regarding the characteristics of patients eligible to interventional procedure that these patients are at low risk of bleeding.

2.3.2 Benefit/risk balance

The benefit/risk balance will be positive.

Patients included in the experimental arm of the study will attempt to a strong reduction of PTS, although the procedure is mastered with limited risk. The fact that investigators already practice this procedure in everyday practice contributes to reducing this risk.

Patients included in the control group will be treated according to the current clinical practice and national and international recommendations. In case of non-resolution of symptoms, they will be invited to interventional procedure 6 months later.

In addition, all patients of the study will benefit from a careful follow-up.

Adverse events will be supervised to control the benefit/risk balance between the two arms. Moreover, the choice to propose a delayed endovascular procedure for control group's patients is primordial because even if the medical treatment is the current clinical practice and national and international recommendations, endovascular procedure has emerged like key treatment. So, to avoid the risk that patients refuse study or leave the study if they are randomized in medical treatment, we propose a 6 months delayed intervention for these patients. This delay of 6 months is reasonable for the adherence of patients to the study.

With these patients, we will have access to results of endovascular procedure at 6 months after delayed intervention, increasing the pool of data on the effect of endovascular procedure.

2.4 Expected Impact

The project will highlight the potential benefit of endovascular therapy on post thrombotic syndrome reduction after proximal iliac DVT. There is actually not real standard of care for the treatment of this pathology. A clear evidence of efficacy of endovascular therapy will be of great benefit for both the patients and the healthcare system, and will provide new data for further international guidelines

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Thrombotic Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients are randomised into two groups:Experimental Group: 60 patients benefit from immediate venous angioplasty stenting plus medical treatment, i.e. elastic compression and anticoagulation Control Group: 60 patients benefit from standard treatment for 6 months i.e elastic compression and anticoagulation if needed. Notably, if patients were no longer on anticoagulant treatment at the time of screening and inclusion, this treatment will not be reintroduced.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EXPERIMENTAL GROUPE

60 patients benefit from immediate venous angioplasty stenting plus medical treatment, i.e. elastic compression and anticoagulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

60 patients benefit from immediate venous angioplasty stenting plus medical treatment, i.e. elastic compression and anticoagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

60 patients benefit from immediate venous angioplasty stenting plus medical treatment, i.e. elastic compression and anticoagulation

CONTRO GROUPE

60 patients benefit from standard treatment for 6 months i.e elastic compression and anticoagulation if needed. Notably, if patients were no longer on anticoagulant treatment at the time of screening and inclusion, this treatment will not be reintroduced.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

60 patients benefit from immediate venous angioplasty stenting plus medical treatment, i.e. elastic compression and anticoagulation

60 patients benefit from immediate venous angioplasty stenting plus medical treatment, i.e. elastic compression and anticoagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient age ≥ 18 years' old
* Patient with disabling PTS defined as a Villalta score ≥ 10, more than 6 months after unilateral proximal deep vein thrombosis (first or recurrent episode) involving at least iliac vein. A contralateral distal or superficial vein thrombosis was not considered as bilateral thrombosis.


Patients would be screened more than 6 months after the index DVT event to be sure that symptoms were related to chronic phase of PTS and not to the acute DVT event.

Although endovascular therapy has actually matured to propose a systematic evaluation, the procedure remains experimental with potential risks. Therefore, the study must focus on patients with advanced PTS and iliofemoral obstruction, since this population appears to have the greatest attempted benefit.

Exclusion Criteria

* Index DVT without iliac thrombosis
* Bilateral proximal deep vein thrombosis or Inferior vena cava thrombosis
* Lower limb arteriopathy defined as ante-brachial index \< 0.5
* Vena cava filter
* Venous ulcers ≥ 50 cm²
* Life expectancy \< 6 months
* Contraindication to anticoagulant treatment by direct oral anticoagulant
* Contraindication to the use of low-dose aspirin (100 mg)
* Use of dual antiplatelet agents aspirin/clopidogrel
* Use of Prasugrel or Ticagrelor
* Previous venous recanalization of the same leg
* Impossible to follow-up
* Contraindication to contrast iodine
* Renal insufficiency (Cockroft \<30 ml/min, (less than 3 months old))
* Subject in exclusion period from another study,
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Subject under administrative or judicial control
* Subject under legal protection
* Subject hospitalized for psychiatric care
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Grenoble-Alps University Hospital (CHUGA)

Grenoble, CS 10217, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gilles Gilles Pernod, MD PH

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 00 33 4 76 76 57 17

Email: [email protected]

Julien Colombat

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 00 33 4 76 76 56 09

Email: [email protected]

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Flumignan RL, Nakano LC, Flumignan CD, Baptista-Silva JC. Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011468.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39968829 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-A01311-56

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id