A Study Evaluating the Endovascular Treatment of Subjects with Stenotic or Restenotic Lesions of the Common Femoral Artery with the Supera Vascular Mimetic Implant Compared to Surgical Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy
NCT ID: NCT04349657
Last Updated: 2024-10-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
286 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-05
2028-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An expected total of 143 patients will be treated with the Vascular Mimetic Implant of Abbott and compared to a control group of another 143 patients that will be treated with classic surgical endarterectomy of the common femoral artery. Assignment to the treatment groups will be at random.
Patients will be invited for a follow-up visit at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure.
The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as follows: freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization and binary restenosis at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint is defined as follows: a composite of overall death, cardiac, pulmonary, renal complications, sepsis, target lesion revascularisation and wound related complications through 30 days post-index procedure.
The secondary endpoints are defined as technical success, primary patency in the deep femoral artery, primary patency in the target lesion, target lesion revascularisation, target vessel revascularisation, binary restenosis, duration of initial hospital stay, sustained clinical improvement, change of walking impairment questionnaire score from baseline, change in target limb Rutherford classification, change in target limb ABI/TBI from baseline, all cause death, thrombosis at the target lesion through 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Data Registry Following Patients Using Supera Stent in the Femoral Arteries
NCT01154751
A Superiority Trial of the SUPERA Peripheral Stent System in Patients With Femoro-popliteal Artery Disease
NCT03941314
Evaluation of Luminal Expansion Following Stenting of Femoro-popliteal Occlusive Disease
NCT01643746
Long Superficial Femoral Artery Stenting With SuperA Interwoven Nitinol Stents
NCT03020290
Remote Endarterectomy Versus Suprageniculate Femoropopliteal Bypass
NCT00566436
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients will be selected based on the investigator's assessment, evaluation of the underlying disease and the eligibility criteria. The patient's medical condition should be stable, with no underlying medical condition which would prevent them from performing the required testing or from completing the study. Patients should be geographically stable, willing and able to cooperate in this clinical study, and remain available for long term follow-up. The patient is considered enrolled in the study after obtaining the patients informed consent, if there is full compliance with the study eligibility criteria and after successful guidewire passage through the study target lesion.
Prior to the index procedure the following will be collected: an informed consent for data collection, demographics, medical history, medication record, physical examination, clinical category of acute limb ischemia (Rutherford category), the resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) or toe-brachial index (TBI), blood sample test (complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel and if applicable pregnancy test) and a walking impairment questionnaire. Randomization will also occur prior to the procedure.
During the procedure patients that are randomized within the endarterectomy group will be treated according to the institutions standard of care. For patients that are randomized within the Supera arm, the guidewire will cross the entire study lesion after which the lesion will be assessed through angiography. Pre-dilatation of the target lesion with an uncoated PTA-balloon is mandatory and will be followed by stenting with the Supera stent according to the instructions for use. Postdilatation of the stent is allowed but not mandatory.
The regular follow-up is necessary to monitor the condition of the patient and the results of the procedure. The patients will be invited for the following required follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. During these visit the following data will be collected: medication record, physical exam, target limb ABI/TBI and Rutherford classification, duplex ultrasound of target vessel, walking impairment questionnaire and possible adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supera Peripheral Stent System treatment group
These patients will be treated endovascularly with the Supera Peripheral Stent System (Abbott).
Supera Peripheral Stent System treatment group
Percutaneous endovascular stenting with the Supera Peripheral Stent System
Endarterectomy treatment group
These patients will be treated surgically with endarterectomy
Endarterectomy treatment group
Surgical treatment through endarterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supera Peripheral Stent System treatment group
Percutaneous endovascular stenting with the Supera Peripheral Stent System
Endarterectomy treatment group
Surgical treatment through endarterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient presenting a score from 2 to 4 following Rutherford classification
* Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
* Patient understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrolment in the study
* Patient has a life expectancy of at least 12 months
* Prior to enrolment, the guidewire has crossed the target lesion in the endovascular arm. In the surgical arm, the endarterectomy needs to be performed with primary suture or patch implantation
* De novo stenotic or restenotic (post-PTA) lesions (\<100%) located in the common femoral artery, suitable for both endovascular therapy and endarterectomy
* Target lesion is located within the native CFA: localized between 1cm proximal to the origin of the circumflex iliac artery and the proximal (2cm) superficial femoral artery and deep femoral artery (2cm) (Azéma type 2 and 3 lesions)
* There is angiographic evidence of a patent deep femoral artery and/or superficial femoral artery
* The target lesion has angiographic evidence of \>50% stenosis. Occlusions are not allowed.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous open surgery in the ipsilateral groin
* Patients contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytics
* Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus at the target lesion site
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium and heparin, including those patients who have had a previous incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II
* Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to study procedure
* Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders
* Female patients with child bearing potential not taking adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding
* Ipsilateral inflow (aorto-iliac) artery treatment before target lesion treatment with a residual stenosis \>30%
* Use of thrombectomy, atherectomy or laser device during procedure
* Any patient considered to be hemodynamically unstable at onset of procedure
* Severe medical comorbidities (untreated coronary artery disease/congestive heart failure, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metastatic malignancy, dementia, etc.) or other medical condition that would prelude compliance with the study protocol or 1-year life expectancy
* Major distal amputation (above the ankle) in the study limb or non-study limb
* Target lesion involves an (pseudo-)aneurysm or is adjacent to an (pseudo-)aneurysm (within 5mm)
* Iliac inflow disease requiring treatment, unless the iliac artery disease is successfully treated first during the index procedure. Success is defined as ≤30% residual diameter stenosis without death or major complications
* Presence of an aortic, iliac or femoral artificial graft
* Occlusion in the target lesion
* Presence of an interposition graft with/without profunda reimplantation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ID3 Medical
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Koen Deloose, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
A.Z. Sint-Blasius
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
O.L.V. Hospital
Aalst, , Belgium
Imelda Hospital
Bonheiden, , Belgium
A.Z. Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, , Belgium
Z.O.L.
Genk, , Belgium
Az Groeninge
Kortrijk, , Belgium
AZ Sint-Maarten
Mechelen, , Belgium
A.Z. Jan Portaels
Vilvoorde, , Belgium
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Dijklander hospital
Hoorn, North Holland, Netherlands
St Antonius Hospital
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Noordwest ziekenhuisgroep
Alkmaar, , Netherlands
Bonifraterskie Centrum Medyczne
Krakow, , Poland
Karol Marcinkowski Medical University
Poznan, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Lieven Maene, MD
Role: primary
Roel Beelen, MD
Role: backup
Jürgen Verbist, MD
Role: primary
Wouter Van den Eynde, MD
Role: backup
Koen Deloose, MD
Role: primary
Joren Callaert, MD
Role: backup
Wouter Lansink, MD
Role: primary
Philip Lerut, MD
Role: primary
Paul Wallaert, MD
Role: backup
Yves Tielemans, MD
Role: primary
Catherine Terry, MD
Role: backup
Jorn Robijn, MD
Role: primary
Kim Taeymans, MD
Role: backup
Daniel van den Heuvel
Role: primary
Maciej Chwala
Role: primary
Jolanta Tomczak
Role: primary
Zbigniew Krasiński, Prof
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUPERSURG RCT-v1.0-05MAR2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.