Comparison of Two Under Knee Lower Limb Bypass Types:Endothelialised Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein Graft

NCT ID: NCT00221806

Last Updated: 2005-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this project is to improve the hemocompatibility of vascular prosthesis with a complete covering of its endoluminal surface with autologous endothelial cells. The objective is to obtain a better bypass permeability with arterial prosthesis replacing low diameter vessels in lower limbs

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Physiological vascular endothelium is an hemocompatible and thrombus resistant surface and none of the materials used for revascularisation owns these properties. The aim of this project is to improve the hemocompatibility of vascular prosthesis with a complete covering of their endoluminal surface with autologous endothelial cells. This strategy, that plans to associate an artificial component of synthetic origin and cellular component is a bioartificial vascular substitute concept. First results obtained by an austrian team are really encouraging (with more than 100 patients during last 10 years). Thus, the main objective of this study is to compare efficacy in terms of grafts with endothelialised PTFE prosthesis with great saphenous autologous vein graft for under knee arterial popliteal revascularisation of lower limbs.

This is a phase III, randomised equivalent trial. It is open labelled, with 2 parallel well balanced groups. Forty patients will be randomised. A short segment of the cephalic vein will be cut and some blood will be sampled in patients randomised in the ePTFE group. Endothelial cells of the cephalic vein will be isolated, cultured, with autologous serum, and then amplified before sowing of the internal face of PTFE prosthesis, previously covered with a biological glue clinically validated. Before prosthesis implantation, systematic quality controls will be performed. Implantation will be planned 3 weeks after venous sampling. Eventual failure of cellular culture or prosthesis covering will lead to an autologous vein graft. People randomised in the second group will receive an autologous saphenous vein graft.

The primary outcome is to demonstrate the equivalence of time dependent permeability rate between endothelialized PTFE and autologous vein graft. Equivalence between both technics would allow to preserve autologous saphenous vein for later distal bypasses (where it is the best technic) or for coronary bypasses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arteritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Arteritis, femoro popliteal bypass, endothelialised prosthesis, saphenous vein graft, permeability, Doppler echography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endothelialised prosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Age above 18, male or female, II to IV arteritis level with intermittent limping, under knee femoro popliteal bypass indication.

Available saphenous vein, no major trophic trouble, no contra indication to the use of prosthesis.

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

W.L.Gore & Associates

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laurence Bordenave, MD-PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Jacques Demotes-Mainard, MD-PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

CIC INSERM-CHU de Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de chirurgie vasculaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dominique Midy, MD

Role: primary

Laurence Bordenaave, MD-PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9256-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id