Comparison of Two Under Knee Lower Limb Bypass Types:Endothelialised Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein Graft
NCT ID: NCT00221806
Last Updated: 2005-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-06-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a phase III, randomised equivalent trial. It is open labelled, with 2 parallel well balanced groups. Forty patients will be randomised. A short segment of the cephalic vein will be cut and some blood will be sampled in patients randomised in the ePTFE group. Endothelial cells of the cephalic vein will be isolated, cultured, with autologous serum, and then amplified before sowing of the internal face of PTFE prosthesis, previously covered with a biological glue clinically validated. Before prosthesis implantation, systematic quality controls will be performed. Implantation will be planned 3 weeks after venous sampling. Eventual failure of cellular culture or prosthesis covering will lead to an autologous vein graft. People randomised in the second group will receive an autologous saphenous vein graft.
The primary outcome is to demonstrate the equivalence of time dependent permeability rate between endothelialized PTFE and autologous vein graft. Equivalence between both technics would allow to preserve autologous saphenous vein for later distal bypasses (where it is the best technic) or for coronary bypasses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
endothelialised prosthesis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Available saphenous vein, no major trophic trouble, no contra indication to the use of prosthesis.
\-
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, France
OTHER_GOV
W.L.Gore & Associates
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurence Bordenave, MD-PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Jacques Demotes-Mainard, MD-PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
CIC INSERM-CHU de Bordeaux
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de chirurgie vasculaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Dominique Midy, MD
Role: primary
Laurence Bordenaave, MD-PhD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
9256-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id