Stress, Hormones, and Eating

NCT ID: NCT01175512

Last Updated: 2021-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will develop a measure of endogenous opioid tone that might serve as a biological marker for drive for palatable food. Using a 'naltrexone probe,' the investigators will assess whether individual response to one dose of an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, is related to non-homeostatic eating in non-pregnant women.

Hypothesis 1: Naltrexone Response will be related to non-homeostatic eating.

Hypothesis 2: Response profiles to the 25 mg dose will be slightly less in magnitude than the 50 mg dose. However, responses will be similarly related to non-homeostatic eating measures.

Hypothesis 3: Response to naltrexone will be highly stable within individuals across time, in the absence of an intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Opioid tone may provide a way to identify people at risk of reward based eating, with more accuracy than self-report measures. Knowing such risk could improve treatment matching, and provide a biomarker to assess treatment progress. There is no direct measure of central opioid activity in humans, short of PET scans for opioid receptor binding. However, there is a promising indicator using an opioid antagonist such as naltrexone. Blocking opioid receptor releases the inhibitory opioidergic inputs to hypothalamic corticotropic releasing hormone (CRH) neurons, thus increasing CRH, and eventually cortisol in the blood. The extent of the cortisol rise in response to naltrexone might serve as an indicator of endogenous opioidergic tone. It is hypothesized that greater increases in cortisol indicate weaker endogenous opioid activity (by indicating a more complete opioid blockade). Salivary cortisol response to naltrexone may offer a relatively safe and unobtrusive way to measure endogenous opioidergic tone. We propose to test the reliability and validity of the naltrexone probe, taken at home, as a measure of endogenous opioidergic tone. In a previous study (Daubenmier et al, 2013), we administered a one time 50mg dose of naltrexone and examined nausea and cortisol responses. Results suggested that responses were higher in those who showed greater drive to eat. Here we examine a more direct measure of drive to eat, using the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), and test whether nausea and cortisol responses were associated with greater drive to eat, whether 50mg produced greater responses than 25 mg, and whether the responses were stable (highly related) when tested again one month later.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Food Addiction How Opioid Tone Was Related to Self Reported Drive to Eat Using a Measure of Food Addiction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Naltrexone

4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Naltrexone

Intervention Type DRUG

4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.

Placebo

4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Naltrexone

4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

4 days, counterbalanced dosing of 25mg, 50mg, placebo, placebo.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women
* Age \> 20 to 45 years (pre-menopausal women)
* BMI \> 30 and no larger than BMI = 40 or 300 pounds

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent or speak English
* Needle phobic or fainting in response to blood draw
* Diabetes
* Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
* Currently Smoke
* Bulimia (Binge Eating Disorder is common among the obese, and allowed)
* Pacemaker
* Shift Worker
* Beta Blocker Medication use
* Liver Medication use
* Weight Loss Medication use
* Chronic current use of cortisol containing medications
* Kidney Disease (based on elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen and Creatinine)
* Illegal Drug Use (presence in urine)
* Liver Cirrhosis or Acute hepatitis (based on elevated Alanine transaminase)
* Substance abuse, mental health, or medical condition that, in the opinion of investigators, will affect study outcomes (e.g., hypertension, severe food allergies).
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elissa Epel, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD. Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Appetite. 2009 Apr;52(2):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19121351 (View on PubMed)

Daubenmier J, Lustig RH, Hecht FM, Kristeller J, Woolley J, Adam T, Dallman M, Epel E. A new biomarker of hedonic eating? A preliminary investigation of cortisol and nausea responses to acute opioid blockade. Appetite. 2014 Mar;74:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24291355 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1U01HL097973-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Decision-making and Food Intake
NCT07133529 RECRUITING NA
Solutions for Hunger and Regulating Eating
NCT05004883 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA