A Comparative Study Minisling Versus Transobturator (TOT)Sling

NCT ID: NCT01094353

Last Updated: 2017-06-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

145 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A study to compare efficacy in surgical treatment for SUI (Stress Urinary Incontinence), tot with minisling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

eligibility criteria was : female stress urinary incontinence

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Clinical, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of a single-incision mini-sling and a transobturator midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The participants were randomly allocated to a single-incision mini-sling or a transobturator midurethral tape by a simple randomization procedure using a random number generator computer program. Randomization was performed at the moment of inclusion by a nurse blinded to women's histories. Group assign- ment was concealed in consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes that were opened in the operating room just before the procedure.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mini-sling

The minisling Ophira™ is a new intervention therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence. It is made of polypropylene monofilament mesh, held between two self-anchoring polypropylene columns in a fishbone design connected to two delivering needles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mini-sling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The minisling is a new intervention therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence. It is made of polypropylene monofilament mesh, held between two self-anchoring polypropylene columns in a fishbone design connected to two delivering needles.

Transobturator

Transobturator sling Unitape™ is an outside-in approach therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transobturator

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transobturator sling Unitape™ is an outside-in approach therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mini-sling

The minisling is a new intervention therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence. It is made of polypropylene monofilament mesh, held between two self-anchoring polypropylene columns in a fishbone design connected to two delivering needles.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transobturator

Transobturator sling Unitape™ is an outside-in approach therapeutic option for surgical treatment in women with stress urinary incontinence

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mini-sling Ophira™ Transobturator Sling Unitape™

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinical and urodynamic diagnosis of SUI in patients between 18 and 90 years

Exclusion Criteria

* postvoid residual urine volume more than 100 ml, coagulation disorders, current urinary tract infection, sequelae of previous radiation therapy of the pelvis, anticoagulant therapy, vulvovaginitis, and anesthesia contraindication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ana Livia Garcia Pascom

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ana LG Pascom, Pg

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of São Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Federal University of São Paulo

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D, Van der Aa F. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul;21(7):773-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1127-z. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20204323 (View on PubMed)

Djehdian LM, Araujo MP, Takano CC, Del-Roy CA, Sartori MGF, Girao MJBC, Castro RA. Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):553-561. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000148.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24499750 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ophira

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Female Sling Procedure
NCT04571346 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Efficacy/Safety of Midurethral Sling
NCT05255289 RECRUITING NA