Trans-Obturator Tape Versus Trans-Vaginal Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women
NCT ID: NCT00234754
Last Updated: 2016-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
199 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tension-free-vaginal-tape-obturator (TVTO) Versus Tension-free-vaginal-tape-Secur (TVTS) for Treatment of SUI
NCT01392651
Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Study Comparing Two Suburethral Slings, Retropubic Approach (TVT) and Trans-Obturator (TVT-O) Approach
NCT00135616
Study Comparing TVT With TVT-SECUR for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT00534365
Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT), Pelvicol & Autologous Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence(SUI)
NCT01057550
Transobturator Subtrigonal Tape vs Transobturator Suburethral Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT02112591
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
How effective is TOT compared to TVT in terms of:
Subjective cure at 12 months postoperatively? Incontinence-specific quality of life at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively? Satisfaction with surgery at 12 months postoperatively? Return to usual activities and usual sex life after surgery? The prevalence of voiding dysfunction at 12 months postoperatively? Surgical complications, both short term and long term? Utility and cost? (an economic evaluation) The study will be carried out according to the ICH Good Clinical Practice Guidelines.
At 5 years postoperatively women will attend the clinic for a further follow-up. The primary research question of the 5-year follow-up is:
Safety - What is the incidence of vaginal erosion or other serious adverse outcomes of surgery among women who had a surgical procedure for stress urinary incontinence utilizing a TOT device, versus a TVT device, over the 5 years following surgery?
Secondary questions are as follows:
Effectiveness - What are the objective and subjective outcomes of TOT compared with TVT at 5 years following surgery for SUI? Health economics - What are the disease-specific rates of health service utilization related to repeat surgical intervention, as well as surgery and other treatment related to adverse events for women who had a TOT procedure, versus those who had a TVT procedure, over the 5 years after surgery? Using economic modelling and cost utility analysis, is TOT cost-effective compared with TVT over the 5 years after surgery?
Other question:
Do women with tape found to be palpable in the vagina at 12 months postoperatively, go on to develop vaginal erosion by 5 years following surgery?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Trans-vaginal tape Surgery
TVT Surgery TOT Surgery
TVT surgery and TOT surgery
2
Trans-obturator tape surgery
TVT Surgery TOT Surgery
TVT surgery and TOT surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TVT Surgery TOT Surgery
TVT surgery and TOT surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Are eligible for both types of surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Have had previous incontinence surgery
* Have overactive bladder or incontinence is caused only by bladder overflow
* Intend to have further children
* Have Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease, progressive neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis, or are immunocompromised
* Are unable to understand English
* Will be unavailable for follow-up
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Alberta Health services
OTHER
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Sue Ross
Adjunct Professor, Obstetrics and Gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sue Ross, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Magali Robert, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univerty of Calgary, Calgary Health Region
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Calgary Health Region
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ross S, Robert M, Lier D, Eliasziw M, Jacobs P. Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: safety, effectiveness and cost-utility of trans-obturator tape (TOT) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) five years after a randomized surgical trial. BMC Womens Health. 2011 Jul 22;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-34.
Ross S, Robert M, Swaby C, Dederer L, Lier D, Tang S, Brasher P, Birch C, Cenaiko D, Mainprize T, Murphy M, Carlson K, Baverstock R, Jacobs P, Williamson T. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1287-1294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2a151.
Lier D, Ross S, Tang S, Robert M, Jacobs P; Calgary Women's Pelvic Health Research Group. Trans-obturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a cost utility analysis. BJOG. 2011 Apr;118(5):550-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02845.x. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
Ross S, Tang S, Eliasziw M, Lier D, Girard I, Brennand E, Dederer L, Jacobs P, Robert M. Transobturator tape versus retropubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes following a randomised trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):879-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2902-7. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
Lier D, Robert M, Tang S, Ross S. Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence-trans-obturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape-5-year follow up: an economic evaluation. BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1431-1439. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14227. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
200400964
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
18421
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.