Trans-Obturator Tape Versus Trans-Vaginal Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

NCT ID: NCT00234754

Last Updated: 2016-08-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

199 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a health concern for many women. The transvaginal tape (TVT) surgery has become a common procedure to address the problem. Another surgery is now available, trans-obturator tape (TOT). The investigators will compare these 2 approaches to dealing with SUI and follow the women for 1 year. Women will also be followed at 5 years after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a randomized trial in which women with stress incontinence will be allocated to receive either TOT or TVT procedures. Women who elect surgical management of their type II stress incontinence are eligible to participate in the trial. Baseline data, including a patient questionnaire, will be collected. Hospital outcomes, including length of stay and surgical complications will be documented from hospital charts. All women attend a 6-week follow-up visit as standard of care: a structured data collection form will be used by surgeons to collect information and another patient questionnaire will be administered. At 12 months postoperatively women will attend the clinic for objective measurement of incontinence, a full exam and to complete a questionnaire. The main outcome is effectiveness of the procedure determined using a 1-hour pad test. Secondary research questions include:

How effective is TOT compared to TVT in terms of:

Subjective cure at 12 months postoperatively? Incontinence-specific quality of life at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively? Satisfaction with surgery at 12 months postoperatively? Return to usual activities and usual sex life after surgery? The prevalence of voiding dysfunction at 12 months postoperatively? Surgical complications, both short term and long term? Utility and cost? (an economic evaluation) The study will be carried out according to the ICH Good Clinical Practice Guidelines.

At 5 years postoperatively women will attend the clinic for a further follow-up. The primary research question of the 5-year follow-up is:

Safety - What is the incidence of vaginal erosion or other serious adverse outcomes of surgery among women who had a surgical procedure for stress urinary incontinence utilizing a TOT device, versus a TVT device, over the 5 years following surgery?

Secondary questions are as follows:

Effectiveness - What are the objective and subjective outcomes of TOT compared with TVT at 5 years following surgery for SUI? Health economics - What are the disease-specific rates of health service utilization related to repeat surgical intervention, as well as surgery and other treatment related to adverse events for women who had a TOT procedure, versus those who had a TVT procedure, over the 5 years after surgery? Using economic modelling and cost utility analysis, is TOT cost-effective compared with TVT over the 5 years after surgery?

Other question:

Do women with tape found to be palpable in the vagina at 12 months postoperatively, go on to develop vaginal erosion by 5 years following surgery?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Trans-vaginal tape Surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TVT Surgery TOT Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TVT surgery and TOT surgery

2

Trans-obturator tape surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TVT Surgery TOT Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TVT surgery and TOT surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TVT Surgery TOT Surgery

TVT surgery and TOT surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with type II stress incontinence, defined as leaking with increased abdominal pressure
* Are eligible for both types of surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Have vaginal prolapse requiring surgical repair
* Have had previous incontinence surgery
* Have overactive bladder or incontinence is caused only by bladder overflow
* Intend to have further children
* Have Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease, progressive neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis, or are immunocompromised
* Are unable to understand English
* Will be unavailable for follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alberta Health services

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Sue Ross

Adjunct Professor, Obstetrics and Gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sue Ross, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

Magali Robert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univerty of Calgary, Calgary Health Region

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Calgary Health Region

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ross S, Robert M, Lier D, Eliasziw M, Jacobs P. Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: safety, effectiveness and cost-utility of trans-obturator tape (TOT) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) five years after a randomized surgical trial. BMC Womens Health. 2011 Jul 22;11:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-34.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21781314 (View on PubMed)

Ross S, Robert M, Swaby C, Dederer L, Lier D, Tang S, Brasher P, Birch C, Cenaiko D, Mainprize T, Murphy M, Carlson K, Baverstock R, Jacobs P, Williamson T. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1287-1294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2a151.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19935032 (View on PubMed)

Lier D, Ross S, Tang S, Robert M, Jacobs P; Calgary Women's Pelvic Health Research Group. Trans-obturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a cost utility analysis. BJOG. 2011 Apr;118(5):550-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02845.x. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21291510 (View on PubMed)

Ross S, Tang S, Eliasziw M, Lier D, Girard I, Brennand E, Dederer L, Jacobs P, Robert M. Transobturator tape versus retropubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes following a randomised trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):879-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2902-7. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26670575 (View on PubMed)

Lier D, Robert M, Tang S, Ross S. Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence-trans-obturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape-5-year follow up: an economic evaluation. BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1431-1439. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14227. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27506185 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

200400964

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

18421

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy/Safety of Midurethral Sling
NCT05255289 RECRUITING NA