The Effect of Mid-urethral Sling on the Urethral Dynamic Shape and Motion
NCT ID: NCT04843995
Last Updated: 2023-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
190 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-06-11
2021-05-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Changes in the Bladder Micro-environment Following Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT03942549
Mesh-free Suture Urethropexy for Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability Trial
NCT04881721
Efficacy of Mini Sling Versus Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT06334848
Urethral Length Measurement in Women Undergoing Suburethral Sling Operative Procedure
NCT01660438
Mesh-Reduced Sling For Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability Trial
NCT05842005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Investigate the effect of mid-urethral sling on the urethral shape at rest and maximum Valsalva, in other words dynamic urethral shape.
Aim 2: Compare the effect of mid-urethral sling on urethral dynamic shape in women with successful surgical outcome (absence of stress urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months after the surgery) and women with surgical failure (presence of stress urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months after the surgery).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mid-urethral sling
Treatment of stress urinary incontinence with retropubic mid-urethral sling
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to consent in english and come to post-operative and research visits
Exclusion Criteria
* detrusor overactivity \> 40cm H2O
* post-void residual \> 150mL
* Maximum urethral closure pressure \< 40 cm H2O
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endeavor Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joel D Winer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Endeavor Health
Ghazaleh Rostami Nia, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Endeavor Health
Henry Chill, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Endeavor Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Skokie, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17.
Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, Wai C, Kraus SR, Sirls LT, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Chang RP, Richter HE. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, Albo M, Zyczynski HM, Chai TC, Zimmern P, Kraus S, Sirls L, Kusek JW, Stoddard A, Tennstedt S, Gormley EA; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. 5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.087. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, Chai TC, Zyczynski H, Diokno AC, Tennstedt S, Nager C, Lloyd LK, FitzGerald M, Lemack GE, Johnson HW, Leng W, Mallett V, Stoddard AM, Menefee S, Varner RE, Kenton K, Moalli P, Sirls L, Dandreo KJ, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM, Steers W; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2143-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070416. Epub 2007 May 21.
Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int. 2004 Feb;93(3):324-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04609.x.
Wong V, Shek KL. The mesh debate: Transvaginal anterior anchored mesh should not be abandoned. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Feb;57(1):105-107. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12589. No abstract available.
Ling C, Shek KL, Gillor M, Caudwell-Hall J, Dietz HP. Is location of urethral kinking a confounder of association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):488-492. doi: 10.1002/uog.22153.
Tamma A, Bjelic-Radisic V, Holbfer S, Trutnovsky G, Tamussino K, Aigmuller T, Ulrich D. Sonographic sling position and cure rate 10-years after TVT- O procedure. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0209668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209668. eCollection 2019.
Milley PS, Nichols DH. The relationship between the pubo-urethral ligaments and the urogenital diaphragm in the human female. Anat Rec. 1971 Jul;170(3):281-3. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091700304. No abstract available.
Stein TA, DeLancey JO. Structure of the perineal membrane in females: gross and microscopic anatomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):686-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163a9a5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EH21-027
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.