Impact of Unrestrictive Exercise Following Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02316275
Last Updated: 2018-07-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-31
2031-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To assess the natural return to baseline activity level when patients are unrestricted following mid-urethral sling surgery with or without concomitant anterior or posterior pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Activity Restrictions After Slings
NCT04552457
Outcomes of Limited Postoperative Restrictions Following Sling Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06840093
Changes in the Bladder Micro-environment Following Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT03942549
Optimal Duration of Post-Operative Activity Restriction After Midurethral Sling Procedures
NCT04817839
Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning Trial
NCT02480231
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the study, if immediate resumption of normal activity has no impact on intermediate- and long-term continence outcomes, it may result in improved quality of life and cost savings from a societal perspective.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard post-operative activity restriction
As a traditional method, patients will be restricted from activity for six weeks after sling surgery.
Standard post-operative activity restriction
No post-operative activity restrictions
Patients are to resume regular activity immediately after mid-urethral sling surgery.
No post-operative activity restrictions
Patients are to resume regular activity immediately after mid-urethral sling surgery. The investigators will determine the impact of unrestricted post-operative activity on continence outcomes of mid-urethral sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Investigators will measure the effect of unrestricted post-operative activity on early health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A Productivity Loss form for cost-effective analysis will be asked of the patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No post-operative activity restrictions
Patients are to resume regular activity immediately after mid-urethral sling surgery. The investigators will determine the impact of unrestricted post-operative activity on continence outcomes of mid-urethral sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Investigators will measure the effect of unrestricted post-operative activity on early health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A Productivity Loss form for cost-effective analysis will be asked of the patient.
Standard post-operative activity restriction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Self-reported stress urinary incontinence
* Incontinence demonstrated on physical exam and/or by an urodynamics study
* Planned mid-urethral sling surgery
* Available for 2 years of follow-up
* Willing and able to complete study assessments per the judgment of the treating clinician
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant prolapse surgery other than anterior colporrhaphy
* Currently pregnant or \<12 months post-partum
* Unable to read, write, or comprehend English
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jennifer T. Anger
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Anger, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Jennifer Anger, MD, MPH
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jennifer Anger, MD, MPH
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lose G, Jorgensen L, Thunedborg P. 24-hour home pad weighing test versus 1-hour ward test in the assessment of mild stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(3):211-5. doi: 10.3109/00016348909020991.
Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB, Normolle DP, Brock BM. Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol. 1990 Mar;45(2):M67-74. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.2.m67.
Barber MD, Chen Z, Lukacz E, Markland A, Wai C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Weidner A, Janz NK, Spino C. Further validation of the short form versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Apr;30(4):541-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20934. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med. 1997 Jun;19(2):179-86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024606.
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006 Sep;9(6):755-62. doi: 10.1079/phn2005898.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
Hynes DM, Stroupe KT, Luo P, Giobbie-Hurder A, Reda D, Kraft M, Itani K, Fitzgibbons R, Jonasson O, Neumayer L. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh hernia operation: results of a Department of Veterans Affairs randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):447-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
Hamidi V, Andersen MH, Oyen O, Mathisen L, Fosse E, Kristiansen IS. Cost effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2009 Mar 27;87(6):831-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199cfc9.
Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00026474
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.