Comparing Minisling to Tension Free Vaginal Tape in Mangement of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT ID: NCT02263534
Last Updated: 2018-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-10
2017-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Mini Sling Versus Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT06334848
Efficacy/Safety of Midurethral Sling
NCT05255289
Transobturator Sling Compared With Single-incision Mini-sling for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT02540525
TOT, TVT And Burch Colpo-Suspension for Treatment of Female Mixed Urinary Incontinence
NCT02775526
Mixed Urinary Incontinence Surgical Trial
NCT03085979
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
minisling
patients in this arm will undergo single incision minisling
single incision minisling
midline incision of the vagina at midurethral level dissection of the vagina from perivesical fascia insertion of the tape (polypropylene macropore mesh tape) in the retropubic direction with its end grasped with an artery forceps till level of perineal membrane closure of the vagina 2 sham incisions if the skin only will be made at suprapubic to maintain blindness posterior colpoperneorraphy will be carried out if needed
tension free vaginal tape
patients in this arm will undergo tension free vaginal tape
tension free vaginal tape
midline incision of the vagina at midurethral level dissection of the vagina from perivesical fascia insertion of the tape (polypropylene macropore mesh tape) with the applicators in the retropubic direction and 2 skin incision will be made supra pubic through which the applicators will be passed and removed and the tape will be cut at level just below the skin closure of the vagina posterior colpoperneorraphy will be carried out if needed
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
single incision minisling
midline incision of the vagina at midurethral level dissection of the vagina from perivesical fascia insertion of the tape (polypropylene macropore mesh tape) in the retropubic direction with its end grasped with an artery forceps till level of perineal membrane closure of the vagina 2 sham incisions if the skin only will be made at suprapubic to maintain blindness posterior colpoperneorraphy will be carried out if needed
tension free vaginal tape
midline incision of the vagina at midurethral level dissection of the vagina from perivesical fascia insertion of the tape (polypropylene macropore mesh tape) with the applicators in the retropubic direction and 2 skin incision will be made supra pubic through which the applicators will be passed and removed and the tape will be cut at level just below the skin closure of the vagina posterior colpoperneorraphy will be carried out if needed
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with voiding dysfunction.
* Patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency.
* Patients with previous anti-incontinence surgery.
* Patients on anti-coagulant therapy.
* Immune-compromised patients (DM, patients on corticosteroids treatment).
* Refusal of surgery.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Reda
specialist obstetrics and gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ahmed reda, M.Sc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ain Shams University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ain Shams University, Maternity Hospital
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carter E, Johnson EE, Still M, Al-Assaf AS, Bryant A, Aluko P, Jeffery ST, Nambiar A. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIMS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.