Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Transobturatory Tape for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT00573703

Last Updated: 2013-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transobturatory tape (TOT) procedure is a minimally invasive approach to urinary stress incontinence owing to the category of the sling-adopting procedures. Its efficacy and safety, also in comparison with similar procedures have been demonstrated. The benefits of the sling- adopting procedures in comparison to laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, which has been considered as the gold standard treatment, have been showed. But these comparisons did not included the TOT procedure in the experimental arms. Based on this considerations the aim of this trial will be to compare TOT and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in women with urinary stress incontinence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Women with predominant and genuine stress urinary incontinence will be enrolled and randomized in two groups (groups A and B). Patients of group A will be treated with laparoscopic Burch colposuspension, whereas patients of group B will be treated with TOT procedure.

All patients eligible will undergo baseline assessment consisting of anthropometric, clinical, hormonal, urodynamic, and ultrasonographic evaluations. During the study, the surgical outcomes, the clinical subjective and objective efficacy data, and the adverse experiences will be evaluated in each patient.

Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lapaparoscopic approach. One or two nonadsorbable sutures are placed at the level of the midurethra without penetrating the vaginal mucosa and fixed to Cooper's ligament with a tension free knotting technique.

Group B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transobturator tape procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Small incision sites in the vagina and in the femoral/pelvic fold. Bilateral transobturator insertion of mesh by means of needle. Application of resorbable tensioning suture that maintains the mesh and enables fine adjustments in mesh tension during the procedure and in the immediate postoperative period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension

Lapaparoscopic approach. One or two nonadsorbable sutures are placed at the level of the midurethra without penetrating the vaginal mucosa and fixed to Cooper's ligament with a tension free knotting technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transobturator tape procedure

Small incision sites in the vagina and in the femoral/pelvic fold. Bilateral transobturator insertion of mesh by means of needle. Application of resorbable tensioning suture that maintains the mesh and enables fine adjustments in mesh tension during the procedure and in the immediate postoperative period.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Predominant or genuine stress urinary incontinence by self report,examination and test
* Urethral hypermobility
* Eligible for both surgical procedures
* Ambulatory

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* \<12 months post-partum
* Systemic disease and/or drugs known to affect bladder function
* Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy
* Urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter
* Recent pelvic surgery
* Severe genuine stress incontinence (loss of urine with minimal physical activity) with associated prolapse equal to or more than second degree
* Previous pelvic or anti-incontinence surgery
* History of severe abdominopelvic infections
* Known extensive abdominopelvic adhesions
* Detrusor instability and/or intrinsic sphincter dysfunction
* Other gynaecologic pathologies (eg, fibroids, ovarian cysts)
* BMI \>30
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Magna Graecia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefano Palomba

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefano Palomba, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro

Fulvio Zullo, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

"Pugliese" Hospital

Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

02/2007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy/Safety of Midurethral Sling
NCT05255289 RECRUITING NA