Predictive Objective Parameters for Outcome of the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT00658944

Last Updated: 2008-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-05-31

Study Completion Date

2008-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To investigate the role of preoperative maximum urethral closure pressure and Valsalva leak point pressure in predicting outcome in patients who underwent trans-obturator tape for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective observational descriptive study conducted from May 2002 to November 2005 at a single tertiary urban teaching University Uro-gynecological Department. 65 patients affected by stress or mixed urinary incontinence (stress component clinically predominant), defined according to International Continence Society guidelines, associated or not with urethral hypermobility underwent surgery which consisted of a fusion-welded, non-woven, non-knitted polypropylene tape (Obtape® Mentor-Porges). Preoperative MUCP and VLPP, stratified as ≤ or \> 40 cmH20 and ≤ or \> 60 cmH2O respectively, were separately or in combination correlated with primary (continence status: dry or wet) and secondary outcome variables (QoL questionnaires).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Stress urinary incontinence Mixed urinary incontinence surgery trans obturator tape Maximum urethral closure pressure Valsalva leak point pressure outcome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Patients suffering from stress or mixed urinary incontinence

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mixed urinary incontinence (stress component clinically predominant)

Exclusion Criteria

* \> grade II uro-genital prolapse in any vaginal compartment
* Previous incontinence surgery
* Urine retention, neurogenic bladder, benign or malignant uterus lesion (leiomyoma, fibromyoma, cervical or endometrial carcinoma)
* Active pelvic inflammatory disease
* Known hypersensitivity to synthetic materials (polypropylene, polythetrafloroethilene, polyethileneterephtalate, polyglactil acid or polyglycolic acid)
* Pregnancy or lactation; AND
* Any condition that in the judgment of the investigators would interfere with the subject's ability to provide informed consent, comply with study instructions, place the subject at increased risk, or which might confound interpretation of study results.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Of Perugia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties, Section of Urology and Andrology

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elisabetta Costantini, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Of Perugia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Urology

Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.unipg.it

Web site of University of Perugia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC_ML_002s

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EC_ML_002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id