The McKenzie Method Versus Manipulation for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT00939107

Last Updated: 2009-11-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

350 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction:

The McKenzie method as well as spinal manipulation is commonly used for the treatment of low back pain throughout the western world. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of persistent symptoms originating from a diskus in the low back.

Methods:

After clinical screening 350 patients with or without leg pain who presented with centralization of symptoms or signs of disc herniation were randomized to the McKenzie group or the manipulation group. The outcome measures, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, 11 point numerical pain scale, 6 point global perceived change scale, and quality of life (Short Form-36) were assessed at baseline, at end of treatment, and at 2 and 12 months follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In 1998, Cherkin et al. published a study showing no difference between outcomes following the McKenzie method, chiropractic manipulation, or the provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with acute non-specific low back pain. Recently, the need for studies testing the effect of treatment strategies to specific diagnostic subgroups of patients has been emphasized. The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the McKenzie method and chiropractic manipulation, information, and advice for patients with clinical signs of disc-related symptoms for duration of more than 6 Weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

low back pain Intervertebral disc McKenzie Physical Therapy Spinal manipulation Chiropractics Patient education Exercise therapy Random allocation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

McKenzie exercises

McKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

McKenzie exercises

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

McKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy

Spinal manipulation

Spinal manipulation in combination with information of clinical findings and advice about back care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

spinal manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal manipulation to the lumbopelvic spine in combination with information about examination findings and advice about back care

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

spinal manipulation

Spinal manipulation to the lumbopelvic spine in combination with information about examination findings and advice about back care

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

McKenzie exercises

McKenzie exercises according to the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 to 60 years of age
* suffering from low back pain (LBP) with or without leg pain for a period of more than 6 weeks
* able to speak and understand the Danish language
* with a presentation of clinical signs of disc-related symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria

* positive non-organic signs
* serious pathology suspected based on physical examination and/or magnetic resonance imaging
* application for disability pension or pending litigation
* pregnancy
* comorbidity
* recent back surgery
* problems with communication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Danish Rheumatism Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Danish Physiotherapy Organization.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Post Graduate Education

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Danish Institute for Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Back and Rehabilitation Center, Copenhagen

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Back and Rehabilitation Center, Copenhagen

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tom Petersen, PT,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Back and Rehabilitation Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Back and Rehabilitation Center Copengagen

Copenhagen, Copenhagen OE, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Petersen T, Christensen R, Juhl C. Predicting a clinically important outcome in patients with low back pain following McKenzie therapy or spinal manipulation: a stratified analysis in a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 1;16:74. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0526-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25887046 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KF-01-057/03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id