Relative Effectiveness and Adverse Effects of Cervical Manipulation, Mobilisation and the Activator Instrument in Patients With Sub-acute Non-specific Neck Pain: a Pragmatic Randomised Trial

NCT ID: NCT01029951

Last Updated: 2009-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

47 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in the treatment of subacute non-specific neck pain. The secondary purpose was to describe any adverse effects of these treatments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neck pain is a common disorder. About 70% of adults will experience neck pain during their lifetime. After low back pain, neck pain is the most common reason patients give for seeking chiropractic care, and the second most common reason for the use of spinal manipulation. Usually, the underlying cause of neck pain is non-specific and cannot be related to a particular pathology as a cause of the presenting symptoms. Due to the uncertainty of the results obtained in the limited number of studies of manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain, further studies are needed to compare the different therapies available for neck pain. Participants in the study were treated as they would normally be with the exception of the type of spinal manipulation. There were three groups: a manipulation group, a mobilisation group, and an Activator instrument group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Chiropractic; osteopathic physicians; manipulation; neck pain; adverse effects; randomized clinical trial Subacute non-specific neck pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Mobilisation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Activator instrument

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18-64 years; a new or recurrent episode of neck pain present for more than 4 weeks, but no longer than 12 weeks;
* neck pain that could extend to the shoulder region or upper extremities, and be accompanied by headache, but neck pain was more painful;
* the patient agreed not to take medication or receive other treatment for neck pain during the course of the study (paracetamol 500 mg 4 times a day was allowed as rescue medication);
* and a baseline pain level of at least 4 on the 11-point numerical rating scale.

Exclusion Criteria

* factors contraindicating manipulation, such as blood coagulation disorders, long-term use of corticosteroids, anticoagulant medications, history of neck surgery, stroke or transient ischaemic attacks; plans to relocate;
* inability to read or understand English;
* and third-party liability or workers' compensation claims.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Chiropractors Union

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute for Chiropractic Research

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Anglo-European College of Chiropractic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anglo-European College of Chiropractic

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hugh A Gemmell, DC. EdD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asociación Española contra el Cáncer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anglo-European College of Chiropractic Out Patient Clinic

Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A.06-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id