Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
NCT ID: NCT01161758
Last Updated: 2010-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2005-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Manual Therapy Device in the Treatment of Neck Pain
NCT01168986
Relative Effectiveness and Adverse Effects of Cervical Manipulation, Mobilisation and the Activator Instrument in Patients With Sub-acute Non-specific Neck Pain: a Pragmatic Randomised Trial
NCT01029951
Passive Vertebral Mobilization and Propriocemptive Neuromuscular Techniques in Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT03813680
The Effectiveness of Exercises Protocol in Management of Neck Pain
NCT02225873
Immediate Effects Cervicothoracic Manipulation Versus Passive Upper Trapezius Stretch
NCT02552290
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Passive cervical mobilisation
Grade III cervical mobilization technique as described by Maitland. Applied to left C5/6 Segment.
Passive cervical mobilisation
Passive cervical mobilization which involved an oscillatory grade III unilateral postero-anterior mobilization applied to the left C5/C6 segment. The mobilization consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Manual contact
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique.
Manual contact
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique. The light manual contact consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Non-contact control
Non-contact control, which involved the subject resting in the treatment position without any physical contact between the researcher and the subject.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Passive cervical mobilisation
Passive cervical mobilization which involved an oscillatory grade III unilateral postero-anterior mobilization applied to the left C5/C6 segment. The mobilization consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Manual contact
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique. The light manual contact consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Without any previous experience with spinal manual therapy techniques
Exclusion Criteria
* Any kind of spinal surgery
* Dizziness
* Previous trauma to the cervical spine
* Neurological signs or symptoms
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Curtin University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Curtin University of Technology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benjamin Soon Tze Chin, MManipTher
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Queensland
Annina Schmid, MManipTher
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Queensland
Elias Fridriksson, MManipTher
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Curtin University
Philip Cheong, MManipTher
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Curtin University
Elisabeth Gresslos, MManipTher
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Curitn University of Technology
Anthony Wright, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Curtin University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PT0004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.