A Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT02972710
Last Updated: 2018-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-30
2018-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
NCT02245425
Comparison of Two Spinal Manipulation Treatments in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT04268667
Short-Term Effects of Combined Manual Therapy to the Cervical and Thoracic Spine
NCT01318720
Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain in Dentistry Students
NCT01962090
A Comparison of Seated Thoracic Manipulation and Targeted Supine Thoracic Manipulation on Cervical Flexion Motion and Pain
NCT01938209
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants will be involved in the study over a 4 week period. Each participant will be asked to attend 4 sessions, with one week in between each session as follows: Week 0 = baseline assessment and treatment 1; Week 1= treatment 2; Week 2 = treatment 3; and week 4 = follow-up assessment.
After completion of the baseline assessment, qualified participants will be randomly assigned to either a supine or prone thoracic spine thrust manipulation intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supine thoracic spine manipulation
Supine thoracic spine thrust manipulation (lying face-up on the treatment table) will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2)
Supine thoracic spine thrust manipulation
The participant will be positioned so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Seated thoracic spine manipulation
Seated thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2).
Seated thoracic spine thrust manipulation
The participant will be positioned so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supine thoracic spine thrust manipulation
The participant will be positioned so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Seated thoracic spine thrust manipulation
The participant will be positioned so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary complaint of neck pain with or without symptoms that spread down into one arm
* Overall rating of neck pain intensity is at least 3/10; the overall rating is the average of the participant's rating of current, least, and worst pain experienced over the previous 24 hours on separate numeric pain rating scales where 0 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 corresponds to "worst possible pain"
* Neck Disability Index (NDI) score \> 10 points (measure of self-reported disability with a 0 to 50-point scale where higher scores indicate higher levels of disability)
* Proficient in speaking and reading English to complete outcome questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria
* Neck pain that spreads down into both arms
* Low back pain or thoracic origin of pain
* Nerve root involvement; defined as the presence of two or more neurological findings (e.g., decreased strength, diminished deep tendon reflex, or decreased sensation) at the same nerve root level
* Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis (narrowing of the central canal that contains the spinal cord)
* History of spinal tumors, spinal infection, cervical spine fracture, or previous neck surgery
* Pending legal action related to current episode of neck pain
* Contraindications to thoracic spine thrust manipulation
1. serious pathologies or conditions (tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, history of prolonged steroid use)
2. hyperreflexia
3. unsteadiness during gait
4. nystagmus
5. loss of visual acuity
6. impaired sensation of the face
7. altered taste
8. the presence of pathological reflexes
9. pregnancy or considering pregnancy
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northern Arizona University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tarang Jain
Assistant Professor - Physical Therapy and Athletic Training
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Heick, PT, PhD, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northern Arizona University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northern Arizona University
Flagstaff, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
962801-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.