Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT02245425

Last Updated: 2018-11-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-07-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to compare the short-term effects of two different thoracic spine thrust manipulation techniques on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain.

The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences between the two manipulation techniques for short-term effects on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be involved in the study over a 4 week period. Each participant will be asked to attend 4 sessions, with one week in between each session as follows: Week 0 = baseline assessment and treatment 1; Week 1= treatment 2; Week 2 = treatment 3; and week 4 = follow-up assessment.

Patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to either a supine or prone thoracic spine thrust manipulation intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation

Supine (lying face-up on the treatment table) thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.

Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation

Prone (lying face down on the treatment table) thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation

Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.

Intervention Type OTHER

Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation

Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between 22 and 50 years of age
* Primary complaint of neck pain with or without symptoms that spread down into one arm
* Overall rating of neck pain intensity is at least 3/10; the overall rating is the overall average of the participant's rating of current, least, and worst pain experienced over the previous 24 hours on separate numeric pain rating scales where 0 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 corresponds to "worst pain possible".
* Neck Disability Index (NDI) score \> 10 points (measure of self-reported disability with a 0 to 50 point scale where higher scores indicate higher levels of disability).
* Proficient in speaking and reading English to complete outcome questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria

* Neck pain related to a motor vehicle accident or other trauma within the previous 6 weeks
* Neck pain that spreads down into both arms
* Low back pain or thoracic origin of pain
* Nerve root involvement; defined as the presence of two or more neurological findings (e.g. decreased strength, diminished deep tendon reflex, or decreased sensation) at the same nerve root level
* Diagnosis of cervical spine stenosis (narrowing of the central canal that contains the spinal cord)
* History of spinal tumors, spinal infection, cervical spine fracture, or previous neck surgery
* Pending legal action related to current episode of neck pain
* Contraindications to thoracic spine thrust manipulation

1. serious pathologies or conditions (tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, history of prolonged steroid use)
2. hyperreflexia
3. unsteadiness during gait
4. Nystagmus
5. Loss of visual acuity
6. Impaired sensation of the face
7. Altered taste
8. The presence of pathological reflexes
9. pregnancy or considering pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Heick, PT, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

A.T. Still University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

A.T. Still University

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014096

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.