Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT02245425
Last Updated: 2018-11-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2015-07-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The null hypothesis is that there will be no differences between the two manipulation techniques for short-term effects on neck range-of-motion, pain, and self-reported disability in people with neck pain.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain
NCT02972710
Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain in Dentistry Students
NCT01962090
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mobilization and Manipulation of the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT00128869
Short-Term Effects of Combined Manual Therapy to the Cervical and Thoracic Spine
NCT01318720
The Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions in People With Neck Pain Who Exhibit Directional Preference
NCT06160648
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to either a supine or prone thoracic spine thrust manipulation intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation
Supine (lying face-up on the treatment table) thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2)
Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation
Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation
Prone (lying face down on the treatment table) thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be given 2 times at 3 treatment sessions (Weeks 0, 1, and 2).
Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation
Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supine Thoracic Spine Manipulation
Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Prone Thoracic Spine Manipulation
Position patient so that small amplitude quick stretch can be applied to the least mobile area of the thoracic spine that is identified during the spinal segmental mobility testing. The thoracic spine thrust manipulation will be applied at an appropriate range of motion as identified by the clinician.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary complaint of neck pain with or without symptoms that spread down into one arm
* Overall rating of neck pain intensity is at least 3/10; the overall rating is the overall average of the participant's rating of current, least, and worst pain experienced over the previous 24 hours on separate numeric pain rating scales where 0 corresponds to "no pain" and 10 corresponds to "worst pain possible".
* Neck Disability Index (NDI) score \> 10 points (measure of self-reported disability with a 0 to 50 point scale where higher scores indicate higher levels of disability).
* Proficient in speaking and reading English to complete outcome questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria
* Neck pain that spreads down into both arms
* Low back pain or thoracic origin of pain
* Nerve root involvement; defined as the presence of two or more neurological findings (e.g. decreased strength, diminished deep tendon reflex, or decreased sensation) at the same nerve root level
* Diagnosis of cervical spine stenosis (narrowing of the central canal that contains the spinal cord)
* History of spinal tumors, spinal infection, cervical spine fracture, or previous neck surgery
* Pending legal action related to current episode of neck pain
* Contraindications to thoracic spine thrust manipulation
1. serious pathologies or conditions (tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, history of prolonged steroid use)
2. hyperreflexia
3. unsteadiness during gait
4. Nystagmus
5. Loss of visual acuity
6. Impaired sensation of the face
7. Altered taste
8. The presence of pathological reflexes
9. pregnancy or considering pregnancy
22 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Heick, PT, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
A.T. Still University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
A.T. Still University
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014096
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.