A Comparison of Seated Thoracic Manipulation and Targeted Supine Thoracic Manipulation on Cervical Flexion Motion and Pain

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Thirty-nine patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to either a seated thoracic manipulation or targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. Pain and flexion range of motion measures were taken before and after the intervention.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain

NCT02972710

Neck Pain

SUSPENDED NA

Immediate Effects of Manipulation Versus Stretching on Upper Trapezius Pressure Pain Thresholds

NCT02081430

Neurophysiological Mechanisms Manipulation

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mobilization and Manipulation of the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

NCT00128869

Neck Pain

COMPLETED PHASE1

The Effects of Thoracic Spine Mobilizations in Individuals With Neck Pain.

NCT02356380

Neck Pain

UNKNOWN NA

Comparison of Two Thoracic Manipulation Techniques to Improve Neck Pain in Dentistry Students

NCT01962090

Neck Pain

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of seated thoracic manipulation versus targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine pain and flexion range of motion. There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is an effective treatment for patients with cervical spine pain. This evidence includes a variety of techniques to manipulate the thoracic spine. While each of them is effective, no research has compared techniques to determine which produces the best outcomes.

METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to either a seated thoracic manipulation or targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. Pain and flexion range of motion measures were taken before and after the intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

seated general thoracic spine manipulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

seated thoracic manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

seated general thoracic spine manipulation

supine specific thoracic spine manipulation

Specific supine manipulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

supine specific thoracic spine manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

supine specific thoracic spine manipulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

seated thoracic manipulation

seated general thoracic spine manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

supine specific thoracic spine manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* identification of red flags suggestive of nonmusculoskeletal etiology, history of whiplash injury within six weeks of the initial visit, diagnosis of cervical spine stenosis, central nervous system involvement, or signs of nerve root compression (two of the following limited at the same level: strength, sensation, reflexes).

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No