Mobilization Versus Manipulation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headaches
NCT ID: NCT03919630
Last Updated: 2020-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-01
2020-04-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Manual Therapy and Exercise in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache
NCT01580280
Cervical-Cranial Dry Needling vs. Orthopedic Manual Therapy for Cervicogenic Headache
NCT03583190
Cervicogenic Headache Dose-Response
NCT01530321
Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache
NCT02373605
Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation for Cervicogenic Headaches: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02708953
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical Thrust Mobilizations
Once therapist has assessed subject and has found the patients most comparable sign they will be performing a high velocity thrust at the end of the patients available range, as described by Maitland's Approach. The thrust will be performed only once. The therapist will perform either a localized cervical rotation thrust which primary movement is rotation or a longitudinal cephalad C1 and C2 thrust, both targeting the upper cervical spine.
Thrust Mobilization
Once therapist has assessed subject and has found the patients most comparable sign they will be performing a high velocity thrust at the end of the patients available range, as described by Maitland's Approach. The thrust will be performed only once. The therapist will perform either a localized cervical rotation thrust which primary movement is rotation or a longitudinal cephalad C1 and C2 thrust, both targeting the upper cervical spine
Cervical Non-Thrust Mobilizations
Therapists will perform unilateral posterior to anterior mobilization (UPA) or central posterior to anterior (CPA) mobilizations grades I-IV as described above by Maitland concepts at levels C0-C3 which reproduce the patient's most comparable sign. Therapists will be instructed to perform 3x 30 second bouts of mobilizations at that level.
Non-Thrust Mobilizations
Therapists will perform unilateral posterior to anterior mobilization (UPA) or central posterior to anterior (CPA) mobilizations grades I-IV as described above by Maitland concepts at levels C0-C3 which reproduce the patient's most comparable sign. Therapists will be instructed to perform 3x 30 second bouts of mobilizations at that level.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thrust Mobilization
Once therapist has assessed subject and has found the patients most comparable sign they will be performing a high velocity thrust at the end of the patients available range, as described by Maitland's Approach. The thrust will be performed only once. The therapist will perform either a localized cervical rotation thrust which primary movement is rotation or a longitudinal cephalad C1 and C2 thrust, both targeting the upper cervical spine
Non-Thrust Mobilizations
Therapists will perform unilateral posterior to anterior mobilization (UPA) or central posterior to anterior (CPA) mobilizations grades I-IV as described above by Maitland concepts at levels C0-C3 which reproduce the patient's most comparable sign. Therapists will be instructed to perform 3x 30 second bouts of mobilizations at that level.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The physical examination must yield a reproducible familiar/concordant neck, head, jaw symptom or dysfunction
3. Pain reports of at least 2/10 for a headache or neck pain intensity
4. Neck Disability reports of at least a 20% or greater impact
5. Patients that report having at least two headaches within one month
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who exhibit any red flag symptoms: positive upper or lower motor neuron testing. Signs or symptoms consistent cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy with nerve root compression (muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the upper extremity, diminished upper extremity muscle stretch reflex, or diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any upper extremity dermatome
3. Patients who exhibit any red flag symptoms of cervical instability tests, or have a positive VBI or CAD testing, showing signs of the 5 D's (dizziness, drop attacks, dysarthria, dysphagia, diplopia) or patient who have signs of 3 N's (Nystagmus, nausea, other neurological symptoms).
4. Prior surgery to the cervical spine or head (including cerebral shunts)
5. Women who are pregnant in their third trimester
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Franklin Pierce University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joshua Cleland, DPT, OCS
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pain Relief and Physical Therapy
Havertown, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lerner-Lentz A, O'Halloran B, Donaldson M, Cleland JA. Pragmatic application of manipulation versus mobilization to the upper segments of the cervical spine plus exercise for treatment of cervicogenic headache: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Oct;29(5):267-275. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1834322. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JC432019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.