The Effect of Myofascial Release in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache

NCT ID: NCT03113357

Last Updated: 2017-04-13

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 34 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2015-01-31
• Study Completion Date: 2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Cervicogenic headache (CeH) is a secondary and often unilateral that is known by referring pain from soft or hard cervical structures to occipital, temporal, frontal and sometimes pre-orbital regions. There is higher prevalence of cervical muscle tightness, assessed clinically in CeH patients and anatomically there are some fascial connections between sub-occipital muscles with vertebra of C2 and Dura-mater.Therefore fascial restriction in this region can limit the normal movement of muscles between fascial plates in different directions in sub-occipital region. The purpose of current study was to compare the effect of MFR Technique in the upper cervical region with common (Exs) on pain intensity, frequency, duration and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of upper cervical joints in subjects with CeH.

Detailed Description

Cervicogenic headache (CeH) is a secondary and often unilateral that is known by referring pain from soft or hard cervical structures to occipital, temporal, frontal and sometimes pre-orbital regions(Becker, 2010). Its prevalence within the general population is about 0.4-2.5% and in women four times more than men(Racicki, Gerwin, DiClaudio, Reinmann, & Donaldson, 2013). It has been estimated that 15-20% of all chronic headaches include CeH (Racicki et al., 2013). According to reports, at a minimum about 7 million people travail from CeH that cause to waste many daily works and so decrease their performance strongly(Suijlekom, Lamé, Stomp-van den Berg, Kessels, & Weber, 2003). Based on last version of "Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group" a list including some clinical criteria as pain by cervical movement or inappropriate sustained positions, soft tissue stiffness, neck pain and limited cervical Range of Motion (ROM) has been mentioned for CeH. The best available studies has showed that the C2-3 zygapophysial joints are the most common source of CeH, accounting for about 70% of cases(Hall, Briffa, Hopper, & Robinson, 2010; Zito, Jull, & Story, 2006). One of the major problem is overlapping of CeH with other type headaches like migraine and tension type headache (TTH)(Yi, Cook, Hamill-Ruth, & Rowlingson, 2005) but it has been proven that the best clinical test with high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing of CeH is upper cervical flexion-rotation test (FRT)(Amiri, Jull, & Bullock-Saxton, 2003; Bravo Petersen & Vardaxis, 2015). some investigations have linked CeH to painful dysfunction in the upper three cervical segments (C0-3)(Hall et al., 2007; Ogince, Hall, Robinson, & Blackmore, 2007). Jull and et al at 1999 had noted that there is higher prevalence of cervical muscle tightness, assessed clinically in CeH patients(G Jull, Barrett, Magee, & Ho, 1999; Zito et al., 2006). Nevertheless anatomically, there are some fascial connections between sub-occipital muscles with vertebra of C2 and Dura-mater (Robert Schleip, Jäger, & Klingler, 2012). It has been assumed that fascial limitations in one region of the body cause undue stress in another regions of the body due to fascial continuity, Therefore fascial restriction in this region can limit the normal movement of muscles between fascial plates in different directions in sub-occipital region(Ajimsha, Al-Mudahka, & Al-Madzhar, 2015; Robert Schleip, 2003). Recent Fascia Research Congresses (FRC) explained fascia as a 'soft tissue component of the connective tissue system that percolate the human body(Langevin & Huijing, 2009) and is a part of body tensional force transmission system(R Schleip, Findley, Chaitow, & Huijing, 2012). Myofascial Release (MFR) is a therapeutic technique that uses gentle pressure and stretching (in both forms of direct and indirect approaches) intended to restore decrease pain, optimized length, , and facilitate the release of fascial restrictions caused by injury, stress, repetitive use, and etc (J. F. Barnes, 1990; Robert Schleip, 2003). There are some studies about MFR and its effects that include: increase extensibilities of soft tissues, increase ROM, Improve joint biomechanics, decrease pain and muscles tone significantly (Ajimsha, 2011; Tozzi, Bongiorno, & Vitturini, 2011). Although; a lot of remedies as physiotherapy, electrotherapy, exercises therapy and spinal mobilization are used for cervicogenic headache (GA Jull & Stanton, 2005; Pöllmann, Keidel, & Pfaffenrath, 1997) but it has not been studied specifically about sub-occipital MFR for CeH. Therefor the purpose of current study was to compare the effect of MFR Technique in the upper cervical region with common (Exs) on pain intensity, frequency, duration and Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of upper cervical joints in subjects with CeH.

Conditions

Cervicogenic Headache

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Myofascial release technique

Subjects lied down in supine with knee flexion. Therapist seated on a stool at the head of the table. Elbows and supinated forearms on the table. Asked the client to lift their head off the table. Position the tips of the first three fingers into the soft tissue immediately inferior to the arc of atlas. The fingers are stabilized in a flexed position - around 45° at the MP and PIP joints. The subject is asked to rest their head back down so the fingertips are in the sub-occipital soft tissues and the finger pads rest firmly against the inferior aspect of the atlas. Once the position is perceived to be comfortable, a series of soft tissue responses will occur, characterized by local softening sensations followed by an increase in the weight of the head.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Myofascial release technique

Intervention Type: OTHER

myofascial release technique take along about 3 minutes. This phase repeated 3 times in each session. At the end, for more release, sub-occipital traction will commence. The subject lies supine with head supported and therapist places the three middle fingers just caudal to the nuchal line, lifts the finger tips upward resting the hands on the treatment table, and then applies a gentle cranial pull, causing a long axis extension. The procedure is performed for 2 to 3 minutes. Subjects in each group received ten physical therapy treatment sessions. Treatment frequency was six times per week for MFR group and every day for exercise group which three times per week have been come to clinical center for checking of exercise by physiotherapist

conventional exercise therapy

Craniocervical flexion exercises, performed in supine lying, aimed to target the deep neck flexor muscles. Then they trained to be able to hold progressively increasing ranges of craniocervical flexion using feedback from an airfilled pressure sensor placed behind the neck. The muscles of the scapula, particularly the serratus anterior and lower trapezius, were trained using inner range holding exercises of scapular adduction and retraction, practiced initially in the prone lying position. The subjects were trained to sit with a natural lumbar lordosis while gently adducting and retracting their scapulas and gently flexed their cranio-cervical spine to facilitate the deep neck flexors.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

conventional exercise therapy

Intervention Type: OTHER

All exercises were performed to a count of 7 seconds and subjects were instructed to perform all exercises daily, 15 repetitions each (twice a day). Treatment frequency was every day for exercise group which three times per week have been come to "clinical center" for checking of exercise by physiotherapist. They also could be taught active muscle stretching exercises to address any muscle tightness assessed to be present.

Interventions

Myofascial release technique

myofascial release technique take along about 3 minutes. This phase repeated 3 times in each session. At the end, for more release, sub-occipital traction will commence. The subject lies supine with head supported and therapist places the three middle fingers just caudal to the nuchal line, lifts the finger tips upward resting the hands on the treatment table, and then applies a gentle cranial pull, causing a long axis extension. The procedure is performed for 2 to 3 minutes. Subjects in each group received ten physical therapy treatment sessions. Treatment frequency was six times per week for MFR group and every day for exercise group which three times per week have been come to clinical center for checking of exercise by physiotherapist

Intervention Type: OTHER

conventional exercise therapy

All exercises were performed to a count of 7 seconds and subjects were instructed to perform all exercises daily, 15 repetitions each (twice a day). Treatment frequency was every day for exercise group which three times per week have been come to "clinical center" for checking of exercise by physiotherapist. They also could be taught active muscle stretching exercises to address any muscle tightness assessed to be present.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Other Intervention Names

soft tissue release

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Neck pain with referring unilateral pain to sub-occipital region.
• The pain and limitation of C1-C2 rotation with craniocervical FRT.
• Intensifying of Headache by manual pressure to upper cervical muscles and joints.
• Headache frequency of at least one per week a period of previous 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

• Bilateral headaches (typifying tension headache).
• Intolerance to craniocervical FRT.
• Presence of autonomic system symptoms like vertigo, dizziness and visual impairment.
• Severe specific neck pain as disk herniation, canal stenosis and cervical spondylosis.
• Any condition that might contraindicate myofascial release technique in upper cervical region.
• Physiotherapy for headache in the previous 6 months.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 15 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 75 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Amir Massoud Arab

Amir Massoud Arab, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Amir M Arab, professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science

Locations

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences

Tehran, Islamic Republic of, Iran

Countries

Iran

Other Identifiers

931672006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id