Effect of Dynamic Cupping Versus Myofascial Release Therapy in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT06031571
Last Updated: 2024-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-01
2024-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Cupping Massage Versus Myofascial Release Therapy in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT07120113
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Dry Cupping On Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT07007442
Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Integrated on Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT04702100
The Synergistic Effects of Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique and Dry Cupping Therapy on Pain Modulation and Functional Recovery on Myofascial Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius
NCT07027644
Effect of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Myofascial Release in Treatment of Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT05213871
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a multivariate disease and is a leading issue in a modernized society. The economic burden of neck pain is remarkable and includes treatment costs, reduced productivity, and job-related problems (Cohen, 2015).
There is no one definitive treatment for neck pain. However, different pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments have been recommended, including laser therapy, massage, acupuncture, yoga, and aquatic therapy (Corvillo et al., 2020). However, no studies are focusing on comparing the effect of dynamic cupping and myofascial release in mechanical neck pain.
HYPOTHESES: There will be a non-significant difference between dry cupping massage and myofascial release on pain level, range of motion, and functional level in patients with mechanical neck pain…
RESEARCH QUESTION: Will there be a difference between dry cupping massage versus myofascial release on pain level, range of motion, and functional level in patients with mechanical neck pain?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group A
group A (will receive cupping massage technique in addition to traditional exercises)
dry cupping massage
Dry cupping is a form of massage therapy that involves using Hijamat cups without skin injury while applying suction and then performing circular and transverse movements
Group B
group B (will receive myofascial release technique in addition to traditional exercises)
Myofacial release
Myofascial release is a form of manual therapy using hands-on techniques to regain tissue extensibility and elasticity
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
dry cupping massage
Dry cupping is a form of massage therapy that involves using Hijamat cups without skin injury while applying suction and then performing circular and transverse movements
Myofacial release
Myofascial release is a form of manual therapy using hands-on techniques to regain tissue extensibility and elasticity
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Participants have experienced mechanical neck pain for at least the previous 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Mechanical neck pain due to trauma, disc protrusion, congenital deformity of the spine, spinal stenosis, and rheumatoid disease.
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
South Valley University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Gamal Abouelyazeed Ali
Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Women's Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of physical therapy, South Valley University
Qina, Qena Governorate, Egypt
Faculty of physical therapy
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cupping vs release
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.