Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Integrated on Mechanical Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT04702100

Last Updated: 2022-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of instrumented assisted soft tissue mobilization versus integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on mechanical non-specific neck pain

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mechanical neck pain is a prevalent condition in various populations. Neck pain occurrence is affected by several factors, involving environmental, psychological, and social aspects. Neck pain represents the fourth major disorder responsible for a person's year lived with disability and ranked eleventh as disability-adjusted life years of a person. The neck pain incidence ranges from 10.4 to 23.3% in 1-year time, while the range of prevalence was 0.4 to 86.8%. It has a high prevalence among computer users, office workers, and females, especially females aged 35 to 49 years old. Myofascial trigger point (MTrP) might play an important role in the formation of mechanical neck pain and is known as a hyperirritable spot in skeletal muscle that is accompanied with a hypersensitive palpable nodule in a taut band. IASTM and integrated play an important role in the treatment of mechanical neck pain.this trial has three groups; one will receive IASTM+ conventional, the second will receive integrated + conventional and the third will receive conventional treatment for four week

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-specific Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
random generator

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization

the patients will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization+conventional therapy three times per week for four week

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

the patients will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization:The subject was seated in a relaxed sitting position. M2T blade was used to find specific areas of restriction on RT upper trapezius. Then treatment plane 1 - 2 and 3 were used.The lubricant (Vaseline) was applied to the skin around the neck area prior to treatment and the tool was cleaned with an alcohol preparation pad. Then by using M2T blade with angle 45, we were giving long slow strokes without causing any discomfort or pain over muscle starting from its insertion up to its origin approximately for 2 to 3 min repeated two times.

conventional therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

the patients will receive hot back for 10 minutes, active range of motion exercise, chin tuck, stretches

integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique

the patients will receive integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique+ conventional therapy. three times a week for four week

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique

Intervention Type OTHER

will receive integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique: from supine lying position.we the patients will perform ischemic compression at trigger points then positional release technique and finally muscle energy technique.

conventional therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

the patients will receive hot back for 10 minutes, active range of motion exercise, chin tuck, stretches

conventional therapy

the patients will receive conventional therapy three times a week for four week

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

the patients will receive hot back for 10 minutes, active range of motion exercise, chin tuck, stretches

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization

the patients will receive instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization:The subject was seated in a relaxed sitting position. M2T blade was used to find specific areas of restriction on RT upper trapezius. Then treatment plane 1 - 2 and 3 were used.The lubricant (Vaseline) was applied to the skin around the neck area prior to treatment and the tool was cleaned with an alcohol preparation pad. Then by using M2T blade with angle 45, we were giving long slow strokes without causing any discomfort or pain over muscle starting from its insertion up to its origin approximately for 2 to 3 min repeated two times.

Intervention Type OTHER

integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique

will receive integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique: from supine lying position.we the patients will perform ischemic compression at trigger points then positional release technique and finally muscle energy technique.

Intervention Type OTHER

conventional therapy

the patients will receive hot back for 10 minutes, active range of motion exercise, chin tuck, stretches

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. diagnosed as non-specific neck pain with upper trapezius active myofascial trigger points less than 3 months of duration and have these criteria: taut band on palpation, hyper sensible tender spot in the taut band, local twitch response referred pain pattern
2. body mass index from 18 to 25 kg/m2
3. their ages from 18-35

Exclusion Criteria

1. if they had trigger point injections within the past 6 months
2. history of neck or upper back surgery, trauma or fracture
3. history of a whiplash injury, skin diseases and lesions, any sensory disturbances, any vascular syndromes, neck and back deformities
4. cervical radiculopathy, and diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome, skin diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Al Shaymaa Shaaban Abd El Azeim

principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Al Shaymaa Shaaban Abd El Azeim

Giza, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

p.t.REC/012/003038

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Two Treatments on Nonspecific Neck Pain
NCT06485921 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
NONSPECIFIC NECK PAIN
NCT05654688 COMPLETED NA