Passive Vertebral Mobilization and Propriocemptive Neuromuscular Techniques in Mechanical Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT03813680

Last Updated: 2021-03-11

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 90 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2015-09-20
• Study Completion Date: 2018-03-22

Brief Summary

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Passive Vertebral Mobilization (PVM) and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques (PNF) in reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life in patients with Mechanical Neck Pain.

Detailed Description

Neck Pain is very common and is now considered a public health issue. It poses significant health and economic burden, being a frequent cause of disability. A significant proportion of direct health care costs associated with neck disorders are attributable to visits to health care providers, to sick leave, and to the related loss of productive capacity. Mechanical neck pain affects between 45-54% of people in the general population .This can result in severe pain and disability. Mechanical neck pain described as a reduction in the mobility of cervical spinal segment is often the focus of manipulative physical therapy interventions. Most neck pain is not attributed to diseases but rather caused by muscular and postural condition. The cervical pain is a mechanical problem .It is therefore sense that a mechanical treatment works better than pharmacological treatment.

Cervical spine often impairs flexibility of key muscles related to cervical spine . Stretching exercise is beneficial for increasing flexibility as well as muscle performance.

The normal function of cervical spine is complex and requires a large variety of activities to be coordinated in order for an individual to perform daily activities with the least amount of strain and potential injury. When the dysfunction develops in the cervical spine, a chain reaction may develop which can affect the whole neck and even the entire body.

Commonly used approaches to treatment include rest, therapeutic massage, application of physical agents like heat, cold, TENS, and ultrasonic various types of mobilizations, manipulations (by physical therapists, chiropractors, osteopaths and others), therapeutic exercises, postural care and off course medication and surgical interventions. However, studies of their effectiveness have generally been short-term and inconclusive. The aim of the study is to compare which treatment either Passive Vertebral Mobilization or Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, whether itself or in combination, is more effective and beneficial in the treatment of mechanical neck pain.

Several studies have been reported to determine the effectiveness of manual therapy/ passive vertebral mobilization but with largely inconclusive results. However there are few studies if any to compare PNF exercise with PVM in terms of their effectiveness. PNF are simple and requiring low level expertise as compare to PVM.

Conditions

Mechanical Neck Pain

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

PVM group

This group included 30 participants. Passive vertebral mobilization was given along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Passive Vertebral Mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

Posteroanterior glides was given to cervical spine using Maitland method along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

Routine Physiotherapy

Intervention Type: OTHER

Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

PNF group

This group included 30 participants. PNF exercise in the form of diagonal pattern neck movements was along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PNF exercise

Intervention Type: OTHER

The subjects was given PNF exercises comprising PNF diagonal patterns for neck along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

Routine Physiotherapy

Intervention Type: OTHER

Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

RPT(Routine Physiotherapy) group

This group included 30 participants.Routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Routine Physiotherapy

Intervention Type: OTHER

Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

Interventions

Passive Vertebral Mobilization

Posteroanterior glides was given to cervical spine using Maitland method along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

Intervention Type: OTHER

PNF exercise

The subjects was given PNF exercises comprising PNF diagonal patterns for neck along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

Intervention Type: OTHER

Routine Physiotherapy

Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care

Intervention Type: OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Spinal mobilization; Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation; Routine Physical therapy (RPT)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients with mechanical neck pain having limited range of motion and muscle spasm and difficulty function between 18 to 60 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis or other systemic disease
• Patients with cancer of the cervical spine
• Patients with history of fracture of spine
• Patients with any congenital anomaly of Cervical spine
• Patients having whiplash disorder with in last four weeks

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Isra University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Muhammad Ashfaq

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Muhammad Ashfaq

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Isra University

References

Ashfaq M, Babur MN, Malick WH, Hussain MA, Awan WA. Comparative effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and passive vertebral mobilization for neck disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jul;31:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 35710215 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

1402-PhD-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id