Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition, Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT03136250

Last Updated: 2018-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-11

Study Completion Date

2017-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neck pain is among the most common musculoskeletal disorders worldwide and is an important public health issue in terms of personal wellbeing. Prevalence of neck pain show excessive variations, with a point prevalence varying between 6% and 22%, and one year prevalence ranging between 1.5-75%. Neck pain like all other mechanical disorders leads to pain, disability and decreased range of motion (ROM). Stretching is a very common exercise performed by sportsmen, elderly, in physical therapy and rehabilitation patients, thus practiced in all sorts of fitness programs. The major types of stretching included in the literature are static, dynamic and pre-contraction stretching; of which static stretching is the conventional type of stretching. The different types of pre-contraction stretching include Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching, Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR), Post Facilitation stretch (PFS) and Active Isolated Stretch (AIS). Pre-contraction stretching is also considered a part of Muscle Energy Technique (MET). Recently MET and pre-contraction stretching have been shown to have significant superiority over conventional stretching in management of mechanical neck pain, but the evidence is currently lacking regarding which of the two pre-contraction stretching protocols, namely autogenic and reciprocal inhibition is more effective than the other. A RCT will be conducted in order to find and compare the effectiveness of conventional stretching and pre-contraction stretching (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition). One Control group (conventional group) and two Experimental groups (Experimental Group A - Autogenic Inhibition \& Experimental Group B - Reciprocal Inhibition) will be formed. The participants will be recruited in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria using consecutive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and randomized into the three respective groups. All the groups will receive the gold standard treatment for chronic neck pain including mobilization and modalities. In addition to the gold standard treatment the participants will receive specific stretching protocol based on their interventional group

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized Controlled trial will be conducted in order to find and compare the effectiveness of conventional stretching and MET stretching (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition). One Control group (conventional group) and two Experimental groups (Experimental Group A - Autogenic Inhibition \& Experimental Group B - Reciprocal Inhibition) will be formed. The participants will be recruited in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria using consecutive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and randomized into the three respective groups. All the groups will receive the gold standard treatment for chronic neck pain including mobilization and modalities. In addition to the gold standard treatment the participants will receive specific stretching protocol based on their interventional group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The participant, investigator and outcome assessor are not aware of which treatment group the participant/patient is placed in.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching)

(Control Group - Static Stretching + Standard Treatment)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching + Standard Treatment)

Intervention Type OTHER

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Conventional Static Stretching 15-30 seconds hold 3-5 repetitions (Page P, 2012) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid, Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles.

Group B (Autogenic Inhibition MET)

(Autogenic Inhibition - PIR + Standard treatment)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group B (Autogenic Inhibition - PIR + Standard treatment)

Intervention Type OTHER

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Post Isometric Relaxation MET (3-5 reps) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid, Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles. (Chaitow L, 2006)

Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition MET)

(Reciprocal Inhibition - RI + Standard treatment)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition - RI + Standard treatment)

Intervention Type OTHER

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Reciprocal Inhibition MET (3-5 reps) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid,Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles (Chaitow L, 2006)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching + Standard Treatment)

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Conventional Static Stretching 15-30 seconds hold 3-5 repetitions (Page P, 2012) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid, Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles.

Intervention Type OTHER

Group B (Autogenic Inhibition - PIR + Standard treatment)

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Post Isometric Relaxation MET (3-5 reps) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid, Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles. (Chaitow L, 2006)

Intervention Type OTHER

Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition - RI + Standard treatment)

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Reciprocal Inhibition MET (3-5 reps) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid,Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles (Chaitow L, 2006)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 to 70 years;
2. Neck pain on NPRS 4 to 8 (moderate cases);
3. Subacute or chronic cases (4 to 12 weeks).
4. Decreased or painful Cervical range of motion (CROM)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Signs of serious pathology (e.g., malignancy, inflammatory disorder, infection);
2. History of cervical spine surgery in previous 12 months;
3. History of trauma or fractures in cervical spine;
4. Signs of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy; and
5. Vascular syndromes such as VBI
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation University Islamabad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Muhammad Osama, DPT, MS-OMPT, CHPE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Foundation University Islamabad

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foundation University Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

Islamabad, , Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUI/CTR/2017/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.