Effects of Holistic Spinal Fascial Mobilization in Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT05392465

Last Updated: 2023-02-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-30

Study Completion Date

2023-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to determine the effects of holistic spinal fascial mobilization on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain so that we can have the best treatment option for patients with chronic neck pain, the duration will be 10 months, purposive sampling will be done, subject following eligibility criteria from bahawal Victoria hospital Bahawalpur, were allocated in two groups, a baseline assessment was done, Group A participants were given conventional treatment along with fascial mobilization, Group B participants were given conventional treatment, Numeric pain rating scale(NPRS), Neck Disability Index(NDI) and Goniometry for a range of motion,3 sessions per week were given, data was analyzed by using SPSS version 25.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders among the general population. Like a muscular spasm of the neck that can cause neck pain, fascial adhesions are also a common cause of neck pain. Fascia is a form of connective tissue that is made up of collagen, surrounds the body parts, and also resists tissue tensile load. There is huge literature regarding the management of neck pain and yet after decades of research, there are gaps in treatment options. In the modern age of health care, it is a common goal of every health care to make patients self-sufficient as early as possible. The self-care models have tremendous advantages. The current study aims to determine the effects of holistic spinal fascial mobilization on pain, range of motion, and function in patients with chronic neck pain. All treatment methods were employed to see if they improve the ranges accompanying pain and disability.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

baseline physical therapy treatment along with facial mobilization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fascial mobilization group

Intervention Type OTHER

Fascial mobilization+ conventional treatment (3 sessions per week). MFR is thought to work directly on restricted fascia; practitioners use knuckles or elbow to slowly sink into the fascia, and the pressure applied to contact the restricted fascia, apply tension, or stretch the fascia. MFR involves application of gentle stretch the pressure applied is a few grams of force, and the hands tend to follow the direction of fascial restriction, hold the stretch, and allow the fascia to release itself + hot pack (10 min) + neck isometrics (neck flexion, extension, side bending) + neck stretches (neck flexors, extensors, side benders and rotation).A total of 40-45 min session three times a week on alternate days for three weeks.

Group B

baseline (Conventional) physical therapy treatment

Group Type OTHER

Conventional physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Therapy (3 sessions per week). In this treatment group conventional treatment for chronic neck pain will be given which includes hot pack, Neck Isometrics and Neck Stretches. Hot pack (10 min) + neck isometrics (neck flexion, extension, side bending) + neck stretches (neck flexors, extensors, side benders and rotators).A total of 40-45 min session three times a week on alternate days for three weeks On eligible participants baseline assessment was done,3 session were given per week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fascial mobilization group

Fascial mobilization+ conventional treatment (3 sessions per week). MFR is thought to work directly on restricted fascia; practitioners use knuckles or elbow to slowly sink into the fascia, and the pressure applied to contact the restricted fascia, apply tension, or stretch the fascia. MFR involves application of gentle stretch the pressure applied is a few grams of force, and the hands tend to follow the direction of fascial restriction, hold the stretch, and allow the fascia to release itself + hot pack (10 min) + neck isometrics (neck flexion, extension, side bending) + neck stretches (neck flexors, extensors, side benders and rotation).A total of 40-45 min session three times a week on alternate days for three weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional physical therapy

Conventional Therapy (3 sessions per week). In this treatment group conventional treatment for chronic neck pain will be given which includes hot pack, Neck Isometrics and Neck Stretches. Hot pack (10 min) + neck isometrics (neck flexion, extension, side bending) + neck stretches (neck flexors, extensors, side benders and rotators).A total of 40-45 min session three times a week on alternate days for three weeks On eligible participants baseline assessment was done,3 session were given per week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Both genders.
* Age 25-60 years.
* NPRS \>4
* Subjects diagnosed with chronic neck pain with minimum 3 months of chronicity
* Subjects without any other pathology affecting the neck and upper limb.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with a history of Vertebro-Basilar artery insufficiency
* Any bony, soft tissue, systemic disease, fever, malnutrition or tumor.
* Surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Syed Shakil-ur Rehman

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bhawal Victoria Hospital, Bhawalpur

Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM, Gardiner E. Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Jul;64(7):565-72. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.090720. Epub 2010 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20466711 (View on PubMed)

Chiu TT, Hui-Chan CW, Chein G. A randomized clinical trial of TENS and exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):850-60. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr920oa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16323384 (View on PubMed)

Bakry HA. The effect of poor posture on the cervical range of motion in young subjects. Egyptian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2021;5(1):5-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Benjamin M. The fascia of the limbs and back--a review. J Anat. 2009 Jan;214(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.01011.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19166469 (View on PubMed)

Hrkal P. Fascia: The Tensional Network of the Human Body: The science and clinical applications in manual and movement therapy. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2015;59(4):417-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Laimi K, Makila A, Barlund E, Katajapuu N, Oksanen A, Seikkula V, Karppinen J, Saltychev M. Effectiveness of myofascial release in treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Apr;32(4):440-450. doi: 10.1177/0269215517732820. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28956477 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Huguet M, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Rodriguez-Huguet P, Martin-Valero R, Lomas-Vega R. Treatment of Neck Pain With Myofascial Therapies: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Feb;43(2):160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32317109 (View on PubMed)

Courraud C, Bertrand I, Dupuis C. Assessment of the effects of DBM fasciatherapy on fascial system with elastography.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Quere N, Noel E, Lieutaud A, d'Alessio P. Fasciatherapy combined with pulsology touch induces changes in blood turbulence potentially beneficial for vascular endothelium. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2009 Jul;13(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.06.012. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19524848 (View on PubMed)

Stecco C, Day JA. The fascial manipulation technique and its biomechanical model: a guide to the human fascial system. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2010 Mar 17;3(1):38-40. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v3i1.78. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21589701 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/RCR & AHS/22/0144 Nimra

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.