Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
149 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-02-28
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thrust manipulation
Clinicians will use thrust manipulation at a targeted level to provide the treatment on selected individuals
Thrust manipulation
Thrust manipulation is a passive procedure which involves a high velocity low amplitude thrust to the spinal region
Non-thrust manipulation
Clinicians will apply non-thrust manipulation (targeted) as performed in a clinical manner for treatment for included individuals
Non-thrust manipulation
Non-thrust manipulation involves a low amplitude, low speed mobilization to the targeted region while adjusting the procedure based on patient feedback
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thrust manipulation
Thrust manipulation is a passive procedure which involves a high velocity low amplitude thrust to the spinal region
Non-thrust manipulation
Non-thrust manipulation involves a low amplitude, low speed mobilization to the targeted region while adjusting the procedure based on patient feedback
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* For patients to meet inclusion requirements, they had to display a within session change in pain and/or range of motion during the assessment phase of the clinical examination. In other words, as the clinician performed their assessment and applied a passive accessory assessment technique, the pain and/or range of motion improved during that session, which suggests a favorable outcome using a comparable treatment technique. This is hallmark clinical finding in the patient response model and has been proposed as both a predictor of a positive outcome and as a prognostic variable toward long-term improvements in impairments.
Exclusion Criteria
* Signs consistent with nerve root compression (reproduction of low back or leg pain with straight leg raise at less than 45°
* Muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the lower extremity,
* Diminished lower extremity muscle stretch reflex
* Diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any lower extremity dermatome)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Walsh University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chad Cook
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chad E Cook, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Walsh University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Walsh University
North Canton, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cook CE, Learman KE, O'Halloran BJ, Showalter CR, Kabbaz VJ, Goode AP, Wright AA. Which prognostic factors for low back pain are generic predictors of outcome across a range of recovery domains? Phys Ther. 2013 Jan;93(1):32-40. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120216. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Walsh 10-24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id