Specific or Non-Specific Manipulation for Patients With Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT02883634
Last Updated: 2019-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-03
2018-11-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Spinal Manipulation Therapy Impact Lumbar Proprioception
NCT04869514
The Effects of Vertebral Manipulation and Pain Education in Chronic Neck Pain
NCT02982369
Thrust Versus Non-thrust Manipulation in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02276794
The Effect of Osteopathic Treatment in Pain and Functionality Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain
NCT02956863
Effects of Manual Therapy Combined With Therapeutic Exercise on Brain Biomarkers in Neck Pain
NCT05568394
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
148 patients with chronic non-specific low back pain will be enrolled for this clinical trial. Patients will undergo to a specific physical examination in order to determine the ideal lumbar spine level to be manipulated. The outcomes of interest are pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, global perceived effect and disability associated with back pain. After the first assessment patients will be randomly assigned to two groups that will receive 10 sessions of spinal manipulation over a period of four weeks, and may receive manipulation according to the findings on physical examination (specific manipulation) or may receive manipulation in the upper thoracic region, disregarding the physical examination findings (nonspecific manipulation).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
specific manipulation
Participants allocated to group "specific manipulation", will have their lumbar spine manipulated according to the previous clinical examination.
Specific manipulation
Patients allocated to the specific manipulation group will receive spinal manipulation according to the physical examination performed prior to the treatment allocation.
non-specific manipulation
Participants allocated to group "non-specific manipulation" will have their upper thoracic spine manipulated (also known as "global manipulation") regardless of the previous clinical examination.
Non-specific manipulation
Patients allocated to the specific manipulation group will receive spinal manipulation on the upper thoracic spine that will be not related to the physical examination performed prior to the treatment allocation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Specific manipulation
Patients allocated to the specific manipulation group will receive spinal manipulation according to the physical examination performed prior to the treatment allocation.
Non-specific manipulation
Patients allocated to the specific manipulation group will receive spinal manipulation on the upper thoracic spine that will be not related to the physical examination performed prior to the treatment allocation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with nerve root compromise or with serious spinal pathology,
* Pregnant patients,
* Previous back surgery
* Patients with any contra-indication to spinal manipulation.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ronaldo Fernando de Oliveira
PhD Student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leonardo Costa, PT, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidade Cidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Oliveira RF, Costa LOP, Nascimento LP, Rissato LL. Directed vertebral manipulation is not better than generic vertebral manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2020 Jul;66(3):174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UNICID10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.