Effect of Cervical Traction on Balance in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients

NCT ID: NCT04598113

Last Updated: 2021-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-07

Study Completion Date

2021-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A cross-over randomized trial aiming to assess the immediate effect of cervical traction on balance disorders among patients with common cervical neuropathy. Authors hypothesized that as cervical traction alleviate radicular pain it may also improve patient balance disorders. Effective traction is compared to sham traction.

Main outcome measures are balance parameters (force platform).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A cross-over randomized trial was designed to assess the immediate effect of cervical intermittent traction on balance disorders among patients diagnosed with common cervical neuropathy. The diagnosis is confirmed or made by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician with 15 Y of experience treating musculoskeletal disorders especially cervical neuropathy. Enrolled patients are randomly assigned to one of two arms (1 or 2). Patients in arm 1 (Effective Traction/Sham Traction) are treated firstly with effective traction than one week later with sham traction. Patients in arm 2 (Sham Traction/Effective Traction) are treated firstly with sham traction than one week later with effective traction. At baseline the epidemiological parameters, the pain intensity (VAS), the grip strength, the functional status (NDI), the psychological distress (HAD), the Brief Best Test and the balance parameters (force platform) are assessed. The pain intensity, the grip strength and the balance parameters are assessed before and immediately after cervical traction for comparison.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Radiculopathy Vertigo

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Two interventions: Effective Traction (ET) and Sham Traction (ST) Two arms: Arm 1: Effective Traction/Sham Traction (ET than ST) and Arm 2: Sham Traction/Effective Traction (ST than ET) Wash out period = 1 week
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The participant is treated with the same traction devise in the two interventions with just a traction intensity difference.

The care provider who manipulate the traction device can't be blinded to allocation The investigator (performing balance tests) is blinded to the intervention type The outcome assessor is blinded to allocation

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Effective Traction/Sham Traction

Group of patients treated firstly with Effective Traction then with Sham Traction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cervical Traction Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

While The patient is lie on the back his or her head is housed within the specific head portion of the device. The investigator inflate progressively the device using a valve and ensuring the patient's relaxation. The process of inflation is continued until the level of 12 Kg of pressure is reached. This maximum level of traction is maintained for 10 minutes then the process of deflation is started until the pressure decreased to 0 Kg. This maneuver is reproduced once again after 5 minutes of rest.

The balance assessment using the force plate-from is done just before the intervention and 5 minutes after its end.

Sham Traction/Effective Traction

Group of patients treated firstly with Sham Traction then with Effective Traction

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Cervical Traction Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

While The patient is lie on the back his or her head is housed within the specific head portion of the device. The investigator inflate progressively the device using a valve and ensuring the patient's relaxation. The process of inflation is continued until the level of 12 Kg of pressure is reached. This maximum level of traction is maintained for 10 minutes then the process of deflation is started until the pressure decreased to 0 Kg. This maneuver is reproduced once again after 5 minutes of rest.

The balance assessment using the force plate-from is done just before the intervention and 5 minutes after its end.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cervical Traction Device

While The patient is lie on the back his or her head is housed within the specific head portion of the device. The investigator inflate progressively the device using a valve and ensuring the patient's relaxation. The process of inflation is continued until the level of 12 Kg of pressure is reached. This maximum level of traction is maintained for 10 minutes then the process of deflation is started until the pressure decreased to 0 Kg. This maneuver is reproduced once again after 5 minutes of rest.

The balance assessment using the force plate-from is done just before the intervention and 5 minutes after its end.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral cervical radiculopathy of greater than three months

Exclusion Criteria

* History of surgery or bone-ligament damage to the cervical spine
* Neurological and/or rheumatic diseases involving the cervical spine or which may result in impaired balance
* Inner ear and vestibular pathology
* Worsening of pain or intolerance in the manual cervical traction test
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Monastir

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anis Jellad

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physical Medicine and rehabilitation Department

Monastir, , Tunisia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tunisia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.