Evaluation of the Impact of Tractions vs. Placebo Tractions in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

206 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-25

Study Completion Date

2027-09-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cervical radiculopathy is a common disease related to compression of the nerve roots of the spine (prevalence: 3.5/1000). Dysfunction and pain are the main repercussions and can lead to time off work and high costs in terms of treatment.

Second-line surgical treatments appear to be less effective and present risks of side effects. In the first instance, treatments are conservative and include medication but above all physiotherapy with manual therapy, muscle exercises and cervical traction. These cervical tractions performed by a physiotherapist require little equipment and are inexpensive compared with the surgical alternative. They involve stretching the cervical spine and soft tissues to open the intervertebral foramen and mobilise the facet joints.

Several authors have written summaries of their interest. Thoomes reports two studies and describes an absence of effect. In a meta-analysis, Romeo et al. added three more recent studies to the previous review and concluded that traction is effective, highlighting an "effect-dose" relationship. These recent results therefore seem to reverse the recommendations made barely two years later. Nevertheless, almost all the studies compared "manual therapy + exercises" with "manual therapy + exercises + cervical traction". Only Young et al. tested "manual therapy + exercises + cervical traction at an effective weight" compared to "manual therapy + exercises + cervical traction placebo at an ineffective weight". The study did not reveal any difference between the groups. However, several limitations appear in this study when comparing the protocol to studies that have shown efficacy. The main limitation is the low intensity (i.e. protocol with fewer sessions and longer duration). These clinical limitations may explain the lack of evidence of a positive outcome. Following on from a preliminary study evaluating an intensive cervical traction protocol over five days, and in order to discern the effect specific to the treatment (specific effect) and the effect independent of the nature of the treatment (contextual effect), the investigators wish to evaluate the impact of this intensive protocol by comparing it with placebo traction.

In current practice, treatment varies between establishments. The paucity of studies on cervical traction in radiculopathy has resulted in routine use being guided by habit rather than evidence. It remains a clinical question which raises a major issue requiring a robust experimental design. Ultimately, this study follows on from a preliminary study and is part of a comprehensive research project aimed at proposing new recommendations for the use of traction in patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy. The investigators are investigating the impact of an intensive traction vs. placebo traction protocol in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Effectiveness of Cervical Traction and Neural Mobilization in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

NCT03015493

Cervical Radiculopathy

UNKNOWN NA

Effect of Cervical Traction on Balance in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients

NCT04598113

Cervical Radiculopathy Vertigo

COMPLETED NA

Effect of Cervical Traction on Balance in Cervical Radiculopathy

NCT06727747

Cervical Radiculopathy Balance Disorders

COMPLETED NA

Manual Therapy, Exercise and Traction for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A RCT

NCT00695006

Cervical Radiculopathy

UNKNOWN NA

Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

NCT01495728

Cervical Radiculopathy

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiculopathy Cervical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo mechanical cervical traction

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Intensive cervical traction protocol - placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

2x/day over 5 weekdays A minimum of 8 pull-ups over 5 consecutive days is expected.

Mechanical cervical traction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intensive cervical traction protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

2x/day over 5 weekdays A minimum of 8 pull-ups over 5 consecutive days is expected.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intensive cervical traction protocol

2x/day over 5 weekdays A minimum of 8 pull-ups over 5 consecutive days is expected.

Intervention Type OTHER

Intensive cervical traction protocol - placebo

2x/day over 5 weekdays A minimum of 8 pull-ups over 5 consecutive days is expected.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient over 18
* Neck Disability Index ≥ 15/50
* Presence of at least three of the four signs clinically validating the presence of cervical radiculopathy (Wainner et al. 2003)

* a) upper limb nerve tension test A (ULNT1a): positive,
* b) amplitude of cervical rotation on the side concerned: \< 60°,
* c) positive cervical distraction test: relief
* d) positive Spurling test: reproduction of symptoms.
* Cervical radiculopathy diagnosed 3 to 24 months previously
* Absence of cervical traction in the 5 years prior to inclusion
* MRI or CT scan performed prior to hospitalisation in relation to current pathology
* Patient able to understand the protocol and having given oral informed consent to take part in the research.
* Patient affiliated to the social security system or entitled beneficiary.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with vertebral artery pathology at the time of inclusion
* Patients with myelopathy, cervical cancer, cervical fracture, cervical dislocation, cervical spondylolisthesis, spinal infection, symptomatic cervical pain without radiculopathy and/or cervical surgery in the 2 years prior to inclusion.
* Patient participating in another clinical research protocol with an impact on the objectives of the research.
* Patient who is pregnant, breastfeeding or able to procreate without effective contraception\*.
* Patient under guardianship, curatorship or deprived of liberty
* Patient under activated future protection mandate
* Patient under family habilitation
* Patient under court protection.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No