Effect of Dry Cupping Therapy Associated With the McKenzie Method in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT05459376
Last Updated: 2025-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2028-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of Adding Cupping Therapy in Patients With Nonspecific Chronic Lumbar Pain
NCT04216810
Effects of Manual Therapy Combined With Therapeutic Exercise on Brain Biomarkers in Neck Pain
NCT05568394
Normalizing Cervical Intersegmental Kinematics With Spinal Manipulative Therapy
NCT06312696
The Effects of Stretching Versus Static and Dynamic Cupping on Lumbar Range of Motion
NCT04230850
Effect of Cupping Massage Versus Myofascial Release Therapy in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT07120113
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The individuals will be classified and treated according to the McKenzie method and then they will receive the application of cups in parallel to the vertebrae from L1 to L5, bilaterally. Interventions will be carried out twice a week for eight weeks. Volunteers will be evaluated before treatment (T0), immediately after the first intervention (T1), with 4 weeks of intervention (T4) and with 8 weeks of intervention (T8). The primary outcome will be physical function, functionality (Timed Up and Go test), while the secondary outcomes will be pain intensity (Numerical Pain Scale), lumbar range of motion (finger to floor test), patient expectation and patient perception (Global Perceived Effect Scale).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Each participant will remain identified by numbers and not names. Participants will be informed about the aim of the study to assess the additional effect of two different cupping techniques, the classic and the sham, in association with active exercise. In order not to compromise the blinding of the study, all participants will undergo the same assessment before the interventions. Intervention times will be differentiated so that there is no contact between the groups and possible exchanges of information. Data collected during participant assessments will not be revealed to the researchers responsible for the interventions.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Participants in the intervention group will receive an assessment, classification as to McKenzie method (MDT) syndrome and indication of the preferred direction of movement, whether flexion, extension or lateral displacement of the spine ; will receive basic information about low back pain (LBP), its prevalence and prognosis; plus how and why to exercise; and types of responses that may occur in response to the exercise program. Guidance for performing the exercises at home. Dry suction cup application with 6 size 1 acrylic cups (4.5 cm internal diameter) with a distance of 3 cm each cup, parallel to the L1 to L5 vertebrae, bilaterally according to the acupoint boundaries, B23, B24 and B25 . This group will consist of performing MDT exercises and dry cupping with 2 suctions for 10 minutes, 2 times a week, for 8 weeks.
Exercises and dry cupping
Participants in the intervention group will receive an assessment, classification as to MDT syndrome and indication of the preferred direction of movement, whether flexion, extension or lateral displacement of the spine
Sham Group
The sham group will follow the same principles of evaluation, classification and intervention according to the McKenzie method (MDT) (described in the intervention group) and will have a placebo dry cup application with 6 size 1 acrylic cups (4.5 cm internal diameter) with a distance of 3 cm each cup, parallel to the vertebrae L1 to L5, bilaterally . This group will consist of placebo dry cupping for 10 minutes, 2 times a week, for 8 weeks. However, cups will be prepared with small holes \<2 mm in diameter to release negative pressure in seconds.
Exercises and dry cupping
Participants in the intervention group will receive an assessment, classification as to MDT syndrome and indication of the preferred direction of movement, whether flexion, extension or lateral displacement of the spine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exercises and dry cupping
Participants in the intervention group will receive an assessment, classification as to MDT syndrome and indication of the preferred direction of movement, whether flexion, extension or lateral displacement of the spine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Report pain intensity between 3 and 8 according to the numerical pain scale;
Exclusion Criteria
* Present neurological, vestibular, visual or auditory deficits that make assessments impossible;
* Being in the gestational period;
* Having severe spinal disease (including fractures, tumour, inflammatory diseases, or tumours);
* Have undergone previous spinal surgery;
* Present with radiating or sacroiliac back pain; another rheumatic disease such as fibromyalgia,or ankylosing spondylitis.
18 Years
59 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marcelo Cardoso de Souza, PT, PhD.
Adjunct Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcelo C de Souza, PT, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marcelo Cardoso de Souza
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Almeida Silva HJ, Barbosa GM, Scattone Silva R, Saragiotto BT, Oliveira JMP, Pinheiro YT, Lins CAA, de Souza MC. Dry cupping therapy is not superior to sham cupping to improve clinical outcomes in people with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2021 Apr;67(2):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Almeida Silva HJ, Avila MA, Castro KMS, Pinheiro YT, Lins CAA, Medeiros Barbosa G, de Souza MC. Exploring patient experiences of participating in a real and sham dry cupping intervention for nonspecific low back pain: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0268656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268656. eCollection 2022.
da Silva KMP, Almeida Silva HJ, Pontes-Silva A, DeSantana JM, Avila MA, Barbosa GM, de Souza MC. What are the effects of dry cupping therapy combined with the McKenzie method on clinical outcomes in chronic low back pain? A protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04940-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UFRNMDTDryCupping
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.