Comparison of Ischemic Compression Therapy and Kinesiotaping in Chronic Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT04968769

Last Updated: 2021-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-01

Study Completion Date

2021-07-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ischemic compression (IC) and kinesio taping (KT) treatments on blood flow, tissue stiffness and thickness, pain, and joint range of motion on the upper trapezius muscle of individuals with chronic neck pain.

Methods: In this study 22 individuals between the ages of 20-35 were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group1, which received IC; Group2, received KT; Group3 (control) received exercise, for 2 days and 4 weeks. Pain was measured with VAS, pain threshold with J-Tech Algometer, range of motion with BASELINE Digital Inclinometer, ultrasonographic measurements for blood flow, tissue stiffness and tissue thickness using Acuson S3000. All measurements were performed twice; before and after treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ischemic compression and exercise

Individuals were positioned in a comfortable position in a chair with back support. By palpating the UT muscle, first the taut band and then the active TP on the muscle were determined. Before starting the treatment, , a statement was made to the individual that "you will soon feel a high level of pain with pressure, and at the same time, you may feel pain, tingling, pricking in additional areas (head-neck-shoulder-arm), after a while the pain will decrease and disappear. In this process, try to stay as steady as possible and breathe regularly and calmly.'' The highest level of pressure that the patient could tolerate was applied to the determined TP with the thumb. Pressure time will be in the range of at least 10-20 seconds and at most 60 seconds; It was terminated after the therapist felt complete relaxation in the tissue under his thumb or after the patient received the return of "pain completely disappeared"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ischemic compression

Intervention Type OTHER

manual therapy

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

posture exercises

kinesio taping and exercise

While performing KT, the individual was seated in a comfortable and upright position in a chair with back support. The subject was asked to bring his hand to his back in internal rotation of the shoulder of the taped side and to bring his head to the contralateral lateral flexion and contralateral rotation so that the UT muscle was in a tense position. KT was applied using 'muscle inhibition technique' to ensure correct contraction of the muscle with muscle length/tension optimization, to target the reduction of excessive muscle tension, and to increase circulation with the effects of the tape on the skin. In this technique, to inhibit the muscle, the tape direction is from the muscle insertion to the origin. KT was performed 5 cm below the acromion to the protuberantia occipitalis with 10% tension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

kinesio taping

Intervention Type OTHER

elastic therapeutic taping

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

posture exercises

exercise

In order for all the exercises to be done correctly and not to cause any pain, the individuals were asked to perform the movements in front of the mirror. Posture exercises given the individuals for scapular retraction. During the posture exercises individual was positioned in a chair without back support. By counting 5 it was requested to do 10 repetitions of each exercise. For the UT muscle stretching, individuals were asked to hold their right ear with their left hand over their head while sitting on a back-supported chair with their hips and back fully resting on the chair, and to bring their left ear closer to their left shoulder with the help of their hand and count to 20 from the outside.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

posture exercises

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ischemic compression

manual therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

kinesio taping

elastic therapeutic taping

Intervention Type OTHER

exercise

posture exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A score ar least 3 and above 3 on the Visual analogue scale
* Presence of palpable taut band and at least one trigger point on the taut band
* Presence of referred pain with palpation of the trigger point

Exclusion Criteria

* Analgesic use within the previous 24hours
* History of cervical surgery
* Receiving myofascial pain treatment within the previous month of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baskent University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nihan Ozunlu Pekyavas

Associated Proffesor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baskent University

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KA 21/19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.