Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Occupational Therapy To Enhance Stroke Recovery

NCT ID: NCT00792428

Last Updated: 2018-06-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a non-painful, non-invasive, brain-stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with traditional physical-occupational therapy (OT) will improve motor function in patients with chronic stroke. The aim is to determine the effect of applying real (anodal and/or cathodal) - in a dual configuration - vs sham (pretend) tDCS to the motor brain regions on both hemispheres - in a dual configuration - to improve motor function in chronic stroke patients. Our research in normal subjects has shown that motor skills can be enhanced if tDCS is applied to the brain's motor region during motor learning. The effects after a single session of tDCS can last for up to 30 minutes, effects of multiple sessions (one session per day) can last for weeks. Furthermore, single sessions of tDCS applied to the motor regions in stroke patients have shown that improvements in motor functions can be seen and that effects may last for at least 30 minutes. Patients enrolled in this trial will be randomized to receive either real tDCS or sham tDCS in combination with PT-OT once a day for 5 days. Assessments will be done about 3 days and 7 days after the end of the experimental treatment by investigators who are blinded to the intervention. Patients are also blinded as to whether they are receiving real or sham tDCS. We hypothesize that real tDCS applied to the motor regions in combination with PT-OT results in a subsequent improvement in motor function of the recovering hand over sham tDCS in combination with PT-OT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Cerebrovascular Accident CVA Acute Stroke Acute Cerebrovascular Accident Apoplexy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Real-tDCS + PT-OT

Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with real transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor region for up to 30 min.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Real Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

A direct current runs between two electrode positions and affects the excitability of the underlying brain tissue

Sham-tDCS + PT-OT

Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with sham (pretend) tDCS for up to 30 min. over the motor region.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

A sham current runs between two electrode positions and might affect the underlying brain tissue.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Real Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

A direct current runs between two electrode positions and affects the excitability of the underlying brain tissue

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

A sham current runs between two electrode positions and might affect the underlying brain tissue.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Non-invasive brain stimulation Brain stimulation Enhancing stroke recovery Non-invasive brain stimulation Brain stimulation Enhancing stroke recovery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First time clinical ischemic stroke or cerebrovascular accident
* At least 5 months out from first ischemic stroke prior to study enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

* More than 1 stroke (older strokes)
* Significant pre-stroke disability
* A terminal medical illness or disorder with survival of less than 1 year
* Co-existent major neurological or psychiatric diseases (e.g., epilepsy)
* Use of psychoactive drugs/medications - such as antidepressants,antipsychotic, stimulating agents
* Active participation in other stroke recovery trials testing interventions
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gottfried Schlaug

Associate Professor of Neurology; Staff Neurologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gottfried Schlaug, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center / Harvard Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center / Harvard Medical School

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vines BW, Nair D, Schlaug G. Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Oct;28(8):1667-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06459.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18973584 (View on PubMed)

Vines BW, Cerruti C, Schlaug G. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2008 Oct 28;9:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-103.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18957075 (View on PubMed)

Nair DG, Hutchinson S, Fregni F, Alexander M, Pascual-Leone A, Schlaug G. Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients. Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):253-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17070707 (View on PubMed)

Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G. Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006 Apr 24;17(6):671-4. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200604240-00023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16603933 (View on PubMed)

Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology. 2010 Dec 14;75(24):2176-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21068427 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01NS045049

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2005P000346

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Combined tDCS+PNS After Acute Stroke
NCT01207336 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3