Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Motor Recovery
NCT ID: NCT03826030
Last Updated: 2025-08-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
129 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-01
2024-09-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brain Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Recovery After Stroke
NCT00085657
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Improve Functional Motor Recovery, Affected Arm
NCT01201629
Stroke Treatment Associate to Rehabilitation Therapy and Transcranial DC Stimulation
NCT02156635
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Occupational Therapy To Enhance Stroke Recovery
NCT00792428
Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to Enhance the Benefit of Movement Training in Stoke Patients
NCT00783913
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham tDCS + mCIMT
Sham tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers no dose or zero milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)
Sham
Sham group only receives 30 seconds of stimulation at 2mA in the beginning to create a sensory perception to the scalp in order to blind the subject.
mCIMT
All three tDCS groups receive constraint-induced movement therapy as the adjunctive behavioral therapy for 2 hours per session
2 mA tDCS + mCIMT
2 mA tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers low dose or 2 milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)
Low dose tDCS
The low dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 2 mA for 30 minutes per session
mCIMT
All three tDCS groups receive constraint-induced movement therapy as the adjunctive behavioral therapy for 2 hours per session
4 mA + mCIMT
4 mA tDCS (Transcranial direct current stimulation) administers high dose or 4 milliampere stimulation through the tDCS device, during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)
High dose tDCS
The high dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 4 mA for 30 minutes per session
mCIMT
All three tDCS groups receive constraint-induced movement therapy as the adjunctive behavioral therapy for 2 hours per session
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham
Sham group only receives 30 seconds of stimulation at 2mA in the beginning to create a sensory perception to the scalp in order to blind the subject.
Low dose tDCS
The low dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 2 mA for 30 minutes per session
High dose tDCS
The high dose tDCS group receives direct current stimulation at 4 mA for 30 minutes per session
mCIMT
All three tDCS groups receive constraint-induced movement therapy as the adjunctive behavioral therapy for 2 hours per session
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medication use at the time of study that may interfere with tDCS, including but not limited to carbamazepine, flunarizine, sulpiride, rivastigmine, dextromethorphan;
3. Other co-existent neuromuscular disorders (pre- or post-stroke) affecting upper extremity motor function;
4. Other neurological disorders (pre- or post-stroke) affecting subject's ability to participate in the study;
5. Moderate to severe cognitive impairment defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score \< 18/30;
6. History of medically uncontrolled depression or other neuro-psychiatric disorders despite medications either before or after stroke that may affect subject's ability to participate in the study;
7. Uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment(s) at the time of randomization, defined as SBP≥185 mmHg or DBP≥110 mmHg (patient can be treated, reassessed and randomized later);
8. Presence of any MRI/tDCS/TMS risk factors including but not limited to: 8a) an electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated metallic or nonmetallic implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system; 8b) a non-fixed metallic part in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to eye; 8c) pregnancy (effects of MRI, TMS, and tDCS on the fetus are unknown); 8d) history of seizure disorder or post-stroke seizure; 8e) preexisting scalp lesion under the intended electrode placement or a bone defect or hemicraniectomy;
9. Planning to move from the local area within the next 6 months;
10. Life expectancy less than 6 months;
11. Has received Botulinum toxin injection to the affected upper extremity in the past 3 months prior to randomization or expectation that Botulinum will be given to the Upper Extremity prior to the completion of the last follow-up visit;
12. Concurrent enrollment in another investigational stroke recovery study;
13. Doesn't speak sufficient English to comply with study procedures;
14. Expectation that subject cannot comply with study procedures and visits.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wayne Feng, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Gottfried Schlaug, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baystate Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Keck Hospital of USC
Los Angeles, California, United States
MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Emory Rehabilitation Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Burke Rehabilitation Center
White Plains, New York, United States
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina University Hospital
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schlaug G, Cassarly C, Feld JA, Wolf SL, Rowe VT, Fritz S, Chhatbar PY, Shinde A, Su Z, Broderick JP, Zorowitz R, Awosika O, Edwards D, Lin C, Franciso GE, Wittenberg GF, Pundik S, Gregory C, Borich MR, Ramakrishnan V, Feng W. Safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in addition to constraint-induced movement therapy for post-stroke motor recovery (TRANSPORT2): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled triple-blind trial. Lancet Neurol. 2025 May;24(5):400-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00044-4. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00103316
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.