Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Task-Specific Practice for Post-stroke Neglect
NCT ID: NCT02892097
Last Updated: 2021-09-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2017-11-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Motor Recovery
NCT03826030
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Post-Stroke Apathy
NCT02915484
tDCS in Post-stroke Neglect Rehabilitation
NCT04458974
The Effect of tDCS Combined With Functional Task Training on Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients
NCT04646577
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Motor Rehabilitation Treatment
NCT03268070
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) when paired with repetitive task-specific practice (RTP) has the potential to modulate cortical activity (fronto-parietal networks) and facilitate motor and attentional recovery for individuals with neglect since tDCS can modulate the excitability of targeted cortical regions. tDCS is a form on non-invasive brain stimulation and RTP is the gold standard post-stroke motor recovery intervention.
It is particularly important investigators examine the effect of RTP + tDCS on cortical modulation in order to understand the underlying mechanism of the intervention and determine whether RTP+ tDCS (parietal or primary motor cortex \[M1\]) promotes greater neural modulation than RTP alone. Traditionally, electrodes are placed on M1 to facilitate motor recovery and on the parietal lobe to facilitate attentional recovery, however this intervention is designed to target each of these impairments (motor, attention) and enhance cortical modulation of fronto-parietal networks. Therefore, investigators must also determine the optimal electrode montage and placement for pairing tDCS with RTP for individuals with neglect.
The purpose of the proposed pilot project is to examine the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with repetitive task-specific practice (RTP) on modulation of fronto-parietal network connectivity (measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation \[TMS\]), motor impairment (measured with kinematic assessment), and attentional impairment (measured with Behavioral Inattention Test) among individuals with unilateral neglect and hemiparesis post stroke. This three day cross-over design study will examine the optimal electrode placement and montage using 3 conditions: (1) tDCS to parietal lobe + RTP (2) tDCS to primary motor cortex + RTP (3) sham tDCS + RTP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Parietal tDCS plus RTP
Single session of bilateral parietal tDCS (2.0 mA for 30 minutes) paired with repetitive task-specific practice (RTP).
tDCS
tDCS is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation. Electrodes are placed on the scalp (parietal or primary motor cortex) and deliver a low level of direct current (2mA). tDCS will be delivered for 30 minutes in conjunction with repetitive task-specific practice for the arm/hand.
Repetitive task-specific practice (RTP)
Participants will practice using their paretic arm/hand to complete functional movements during each (3) 30 minute training session.
Primary motor cortex tDCS plus RTP
Single session of bilateral primary motor cortex tDCS (2.0 mA for 30 minutes) paired with repetitive task-specific practice (RTP)
tDCS
tDCS is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation. Electrodes are placed on the scalp (parietal or primary motor cortex) and deliver a low level of direct current (2mA). tDCS will be delivered for 30 minutes in conjunction with repetitive task-specific practice for the arm/hand.
Repetitive task-specific practice (RTP)
Participants will practice using their paretic arm/hand to complete functional movements during each (3) 30 minute training session.
Sham tDCS plus RTP
Single session of sham tDCS (for 30 minutes) paired with repetitive task-specific practice (RTP)
sham tDCS
Sham tDCS will be delivered for 30 minutes in conjunction with repetitive task-specific practice for the arm/hand.
Repetitive task-specific practice (RTP)
Participants will practice using their paretic arm/hand to complete functional movements during each (3) 30 minute training session.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tDCS
tDCS is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation. Electrodes are placed on the scalp (parietal or primary motor cortex) and deliver a low level of direct current (2mA). tDCS will be delivered for 30 minutes in conjunction with repetitive task-specific practice for the arm/hand.
sham tDCS
Sham tDCS will be delivered for 30 minutes in conjunction with repetitive task-specific practice for the arm/hand.
Repetitive task-specific practice (RTP)
Participants will practice using their paretic arm/hand to complete functional movements during each (3) 30 minute training session.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Neglect (Virtual Reality Lateralized Attention Test score \<18)
* Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score between 20-56/60
* Inducible motor evoked potential (MEP) of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) on the affected side using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
* ≥18 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥3) in paretic upper extremity
* Severe aphasia limiting participant's ability to follow 2 step directions
* History of seizures
* History of brain tumor
* History of skull defect
* Hardware in skull or spine (e.g. coils, clips)
* Implantable medical device (e.g. pacemaker)
* Metal in body that is not compatible with MRI
* Pregnant (women of child bearing age will be asked if they are pregnant or could possibly be pregnant)
* Unable to travel to Upper Extremity Motor Function Laboratory at the Center for Rehabilitation Research in Neurological Conditions
* Currently enrolled in another study using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emily Grattan, PhD, OTR/L
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO00056688
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.