Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-12-31
2027-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We will test USN patients showing anosognosia for neglect symptoms. Different brain areas will be stimulated, to target explicit and implicit components of anosognosia, including parietal and frontal brain regions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex on Language Production in Aphasic Patients
NCT02840370
tDCS in Post-stroke Neglect Rehabilitation
NCT04458974
Potentiation of the Effects of Prismatic Adaptation by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) : Evaluation of Functional Interest in Negligence Rehabilitation
NCT02213640
Evaluating Anodal tDCS Preceding Aphasia Therapy
NCT02249819
Multicenter Study on the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-stroke Motor Recovery
NCT04166968
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The introduction of tDCS in the clinical context took place about 15 years ago. Seminal studies demonstrated that weak, direct electric currents could be delivered effectively transcranially: specifically, anodal direct current stimulation was shown to increase cortical excitability, whereas cathodal stimulation decreased it. tDCS has been tested in thousands of subjects world-wide with no evidence of important side effects. For instance, it has been used in healthy individuals to change the efficacy of various motor and cognitive processes, with only mild and transient effects such as tingling and itching sensation under the stimulation electrode, moderate fatigue and headache. Moreover, since it is well-tolerated also in patients, a growing body of evidence is focused on the use of tDCS in clinical context for rehabilitative purposes: after brain damage, the induction of enhancement of the damaged hemisphere through anodal tDCS is effective in reducing the cognitive deficits caused by the lesion (e.g., stimulating perilesional areas).
We will select USN patients, showing anosognosia for neglect symptoms, from a previous study. If only a few patients will accept to participate in this protocol, new right-brain-damaged patients will be recruited at HUG.
A protocol using anodal tDCS (i.e., excitatory stimulation) will be administered. We will target brain areas that could be involved in anosognosia for USN and, if these sites are damaged by the lesion, perilesional unimpaired regions will be stimulated, as the rationale is that excitatory stimulation of these sites can restore the defective error monitoring, and temporarily ameliorate anosognosia.
Before and immediately after each stimulation, the three measures of anosognosia (i.e., explicit self-rating, SCR and EEG error-related potentials) will be recorded: this procedure has been chosen in order to compare the tDCS effects on the different features of anosognosia. To control for the size of the parietal and frontal damage, which could influence the beneficial effect of tDCS, we will estimate the number of voxels damaged in these regions through the lesion maps of patients.
Each one of the three experimental sessions is expected to last no more than 2h30min. This includes: 15/20min to welcome the participant, explaining the experiment and make him sign the informed consent and the screening criteria for tDCS ; 30min of neuropsychological screening (only for patients who did not undergo Study 1 or only for the first session); 20min of preparation of the set-up (connecting the cables for SCR, placing the EEG cap and connecting all the electrodes, installing the tDCS electrodes); 60min for the experiment's recording (anosognosia + tDCS + anosognosia); 10/15min for cleaning up the set up and doing a short debriefing with the participant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 tDCS Parietal
Anodal tDCS applied to the right inferior parietal cortex
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
We will apply tDCS to the patients' brains for 20 minutes at the intensity of 1.5mA. Each patient will undergo the three sessions (separated by at least 24h to minimize carry-over effects), in a pseudo-randomized order across patients.
2 tDCS Frontal
Anodal tDCS applied to the medial frontal cortex
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
We will apply tDCS to the patients' brains for 20 minutes at the intensity of 1.5mA. Each patient will undergo the three sessions (separated by at least 24h to minimize carry-over effects), in a pseudo-randomized order across patients.
3 Sham
Sham tDCS (control, no stimulation delivered). Following a standard sham protocol, in this condition the tDCS will be active the first 30seconds and the last 30seconds of the session, but silent during the other 19minutes
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
We will apply tDCS to the patients' brains for 20 minutes at the intensity of 1.5mA. Each patient will undergo the three sessions (separated by at least 24h to minimize carry-over effects), in a pseudo-randomized order across patients.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
We will apply tDCS to the patients' brains for 20 minutes at the intensity of 1.5mA. Each patient will undergo the three sessions (separated by at least 24h to minimize carry-over effects), in a pseudo-randomized order across patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of USN, as assessed by a standard neuropsychological evaluation
* Structural images of the brain lesion available (magnetic resonance or tomographic scans)
* Criteria for electrical brain stimulation
* Good (or corrected) visual acuity
* High proficiency in French
* Right-handed
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of difficulty in task's comprehension
* Impossibility to sustain a research session of at least 45minutes (e.g., attentional lability)
* Precedent additional neurological disorder and/or current or precedent psychiatric disease
Presence (or suspected presence) of metal in the brain or skull or body (except titanium) (e.g. splinters, fragments, clips, etc.) Presence of cochlear implants, implanted neuro-stimulator (e.g., DBS, epidural/subdural, VNS), cardiac pacemaker, medication infusion device, spinal or ventricular derivations Presence of epilepsy (participant and/or the close family) and/or precedent epileptic seizures (participant) Presence of a fainting spell or syncope, due to neurological diseases (not consider syncope during blood sampling or after being in a warm environment or after emotionally stressful events) Presence of a severe (i.e., followed by loss of consciousness) head trauma Presence of hearing problems or ringing in your ears (e.g. tinnitus) Current treatment under psychoactive (e.g. antidepressants, tranquilizers) or antiepileptic medications Chronic headache For women: you are pregnant or there is any chance that you might be.
20 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
University of Geneva, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Roberta Ronchi
Dr
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-01749
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.